- Thread starter
- #321
Carter downsized because of the end of the VietNam war
Clinton downsized because of the end of the Cold War
What would a Republican President have done?
Why would Carter feel the need to downsize in the midst of The Cold War? Ronald Reagan ended The Cold War. Why would Clinton need to end something Reagan already did? The answer to your question is both Carter and Clinton's successors, Republicans, beefed us up to build a Defense that would end the Cold War and build an intel infrastructure that helped US get Bin Laden. The current President was smart enough to leave this good Intel infrastructure in place to give the nod to kill Bin Laden.
Do you understand how many troops we had in VietNam? Why would you want to maintain that troop strength without a war. Cold War forces in Europe remained constant.
Reagan did not end the Cold War. It happened under Bush. Force restructuring in a post cold war military did not begin until Clinton
Did you know that most of our troops after Vietnam were in Germany????
Clinton pulled most of them out and sent them home. Bush had to rebuild the military because of all of the Clinton cuts. Carter didn't reduce personnel as much as cut most of our funding. We had to put everything together with coat-hangers and bailing wire. Reagan reversed that and rebuilt the military we used to kick Saddam out of Kuwait.