Official Mueller Report Thread

[Ridgerunner]

 

[AntonToo]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

 

[AntonToo]

Idiot, Trump ordered McGhan to fire Mueller - no very co-operative, is it now?

He was blowing off steam .. go away

Why didn’t he “blow off some steam” by walking out and shooting someone in broad day light?

I don’t give a shit what you call that behavior, I call it plain-Jane Obstruction.

You realize he could have fired mueller if he wanted lol he had every right.. lol poor guy

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

Lol none of that is obstruction! There could have been another council to replace mueller picked by Barr.. investigation would have continued.. does your brain shut down after a few mins? Lol

Then what the fuck is that if not obstruction??? What is Trump possibly doing there if not trying to subvert an investigation into himself and his people?


Drop the name Trump and Russia in this story and replace it with Obama and Iranian Mullahs and tell me a with a striaght face you wouldn't think that such behaviour would be clear cut criminal abuse of power.

 

[Jitss617]

He was blowing off steam .. go away

Why didn’t he “blow off some steam” by walking out and shooting someone in broad day light?

I don’t give a shit what you call that behavior, I call it plain-Jane Obstruction.

You realize he could have fired mueller if he wanted lol he had every right.. lol poor guy

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

Lol none of that is obstruction! There could have been another council to replace mueller picked by Barr.. investigation would have continued.. does your brain shut down after a few mins? Lol

Then what the fuck is that if not obstruction??? What is Trump possibly doing there if not trying to subvert an investigation into himself and his people?


Drop the name Trump and Russia in this story and replace it with Obama and Iranian Mullahs and tell me a with a striaght face you wouldn't think that such behaviour would be criminal abuse of power.

Trump had every right .. and Obama had his attorney general.. trump didn’t.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

And then he, the president of the United States, who has full authority to fire Mueller, did not fire Mueller.

No obstruction,, this is political banter from democrats FBI agents but hurt trump won.

It does NOT matter, you are not dealing with completely sane peoples and that include the Democrats in The House of Representatives who are now in the control of deranged Conspiracy Theorists like Adam Schiff and Maxine Waters etc.

They are going to ATTEMPT to Impeach Trump on this Obstruction of Justice thing that did NOT occur and like with EVERYTHING The Unhinged Left do it is going to FAIL in a spectacular way, they are NOT going to get to REMOVE Trump from Office which HAS been their PLAN since the day AFTER he won the 2016 Election. The Senate in CONTROL of enough Republicans who are not Cuckservatives are NEVER going to vote to Impeach Trump and with all of this the Democrats are going to be punished in 2020 like the Republicans were punished when they attempted to remove Bill Clinton from Office and so never interrupt your Enemy when they are THIS DEMENTED and are on the way to Self-Destructing.

 

[Hale]

So, have any USMB Trombies come to this thread and posted with integrity? Have any of them admitted that Mueller found evidence of both collusion and obstruction?

Funny, Mueller didn't find any evidence... Does it hurt to be this deluded?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is facts laid out in Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report.

Barr was indeed going by facts in Mueller's Report.

He was when he said report does not exonorate Trump. He then took it upon himself to exonorate Trump and that part no one gives a shit about.

Lets see the report.

Are you listening to this analysis? The reason Mueller punted the decision of whether or not it’s obstruction of justice to Congress is because he felt that a president can not be indicted.

But in the report it says that Trump put all kinds of pressure on Jeff sessions to unrecuse himself. He told sessions that sessions would become a hero if he would unrecuse himself. Refused.

Trump tried to get people to write letters that they didn’t believe were truthful.

All Clinton did was lie about getting a BJ. And getting a BJ was not illegal. Monica was well past the age of consent. And she admitted that she made the first moves.

They said that if Trump tried to obstruct one or two times then OK it could be mistakes. But after a dozen time of doing everything he could to obstruct, then that’s the very definition of obstruction.

Move on with the Trump Russia hoax that failed, lefties.

He was NOT EXONERATED

Means next to nothing.

Democrats outraged as Trump team shapes Mueller report rollout

'The two top Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, called on Mueller to publicly testify "as soon as possible."
"Attorney General Barr's regrettably partisan handling of the Mueller report, including his slanted March 24th summary letter, his irresponsible testimony before Congress last week, and his indefensible plan to spin the report in a press conference later this morning — hours before he allows the public or Congress to see it — have resulted in a crisis of confidence in his independence and impartiality," the two leaders said in a joint statement Thursday morning.'

Trump team shapes Mueller report rollout, leading to Democrat outrage - CNNPolitics

Barr has proven time and again that he cannot be trusted on this matter and his words mean nothing.

If Trumpbots think this is over...guess again.


BTW - I doubt that Trump did anything illegal with Russia. Stupid - put probably not illegal.

But the childish way Trump and Barr are handling this whole thing are guaranteeing that it will not go away until they release the entire report to Congress.
The fact that they won't do it just adds to the assumption of guilt on Trump's part.

You are indeed clueless.

LOL...and you need to read a dictionary. I suggest the Oxford version.

'clueless

ADJECTIVE

• Having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.'

clueless | Definition of clueless in English by Oxford Dictionaries

If I were actually 'clueless'...I would not be able to read or type...let alone work a computer.

So clearly - I am far from clueless.

DUH.


Making you Trumpbots look uneducated/ignorant is STAGGERINGLY easy.


Have a nice day.

Mueller report shows he chose not to charge Trump because obstruction was in plain view

Right....he committed Obstruction in Plain Sight! Mueller wanted Congress to decide whether trump obstructed justice....Barr is PROTECTING THE POS!

The Democrats need to find out why Mueller stated over and over that Congress could make that decision.

Barr on the other hand dismissed those assertions and just came out and said.....Naw....no obstruction..

This report is a road map to Impeachment...especially after the Dems win the Senate in 2020.

Mueller report lists 10 episodes of potential Trump obstruction

'Attorney General Bill Barr said at a press conference Thursday that special counsel Robert Mueller found 10 episodes of President Trump potentially obstructing justice.'

Mueller report lists 10 episodes of potential Trump obstruction

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

Page 118:

a. Obstructive act. The President's repeated efforts to get McGahn to create a record denying that the President had directed him to remove the Special Counsel would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness if he testified consistently with his memory, rather than with what the record said.


Page 120:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn's account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President's conduct toward the investigation.

So, have any USMB Trombies come to this thread and posted with integrity? Have any of them admitted that Mueller found evidence of both collusion and obstruction?

Let's have a little exercise: You faggots read this, then post where you think the AG was wrong, and I will rebut and mock you:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

 

[edward37]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is facts laid out in Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report.

Barr was indeed going by facts in Mueller's Report.

He was when he said report does not exonorate Trump. He then took it upon himself to exonorate Trump and that part no one gives a shit about.

Lets see the report.

Are you listening to this analysis? The reason Mueller punted the decision of whether or not it’s obstruction of justice to Congress is because he felt that a president can not be indicted.

But in the report it says that Trump put all kinds of pressure on Jeff sessions to unrecuse himself. He told sessions that sessions would become a hero if he would unrecuse himself. Refused.

Trump tried to get people to write letters that they didn’t believe were truthful.

All Clinton did was lie about getting a BJ. And getting a BJ was not illegal. Monica was well past the age of consent. And she admitted that she made the first moves.

They said that if Trump tried to obstruct one or two times then OK it could be mistakes. But after a dozen time of doing everything he could to obstruct, then that’s the very definition of obstruction.

Move on with the Trump Russia hoax that failed, lefties.

He was NOT EXONERATED

Means next to nothing.

Democrats outraged as Trump team shapes Mueller report rollout

'The two top Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, called on Mueller to publicly testify "as soon as possible."
"Attorney General Barr's regrettably partisan handling of the Mueller report, including his slanted March 24th summary letter, his irresponsible testimony before Congress last week, and his indefensible plan to spin the report in a press conference later this morning — hours before he allows the public or Congress to see it — have resulted in a crisis of confidence in his independence and impartiality," the two leaders said in a joint statement Thursday morning.'

Trump team shapes Mueller report rollout, leading to Democrat outrage - CNNPolitics

Barr has proven time and again that he cannot be trusted on this matter and his words mean nothing.

If Trumpbots think this is over...guess again.


BTW - I doubt that Trump did anything illegal with Russia. Stupid - put probably not illegal.

But the childish way Trump and Barr are handling this whole thing are guaranteeing that it will not go away until they release the entire report to Congress.
The fact that they won't do it just adds to the assumption of guilt on Trump's part.

You are indeed clueless.

LOL...and you need to read a dictionary. I suggest the Oxford version.

'clueless

ADJECTIVE

• Having no knowledge, understanding, or ability.'

clueless | Definition of clueless in English by Oxford Dictionaries

If I were actually 'clueless'...I would not be able to read or type...let alone work a computer.

So clearly - I am far from clueless.

DUH.


Making you Trumpbots look uneducated/ignorant is STAGGERINGLY easy.


Have a nice day.

Mueller report shows he chose not to charge Trump because obstruction was in plain view

Right....he committed Obstruction in Plain Sight! Mueller wanted Congress to decide whether trump obstructed justice....Barr is PROTECTING THE POS!

The Democrats need to find out why Mueller stated over and over that Congress could make that decision.

Barr on the other hand dismissed those assertions and just came out and said.....Naw....no obstruction..

This report is a road map to Impeachment...especially after the Dems win the Senate in 2020.

Mueller report lists 10 episodes of potential Trump obstruction

'Attorney General Bill Barr said at a press conference Thursday that special counsel Robert Mueller found 10 episodes of President Trump potentially obstructing justice.'

Mueller report lists 10 episodes of potential Trump obstruction

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

Page 118:

a. Obstructive act. The President's repeated efforts to get McGahn to create a record denying that the President had directed him to remove the Special Counsel would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness if he testified consistently with his memory, rather than with what the record said.


Page 120:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn's account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President's conduct toward the investigation.

So, have any USMB Trombies come to this thread and posted with integrity? Have any of them admitted that Mueller found evidence of both collusion and obstruction?

Let's have a little exercise: You faggots read this, then post where you think the AG was wrong, and I will rebut and mock you:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Are you fucked too ,the end of your postings?

 

[bodecea]

We may have riots by the end of the day.

Wouldn't you just like that.

 

[edward37]

Mueller report says it does not exonerate trump Trump said special council was the end of his presidency Why would the lying scumbag say that?

 

[Markle]

Here is the TRANSCRIPT of Attorney General's press conference, that was done earlier today, all black and red boldings in the transcript are mine

"Good Morning. Thank you all for being here today.

On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations.

As I said during my Senate confirmation hearing and since, I am committed to ensuring the greatest possible degree of transparency concerning the Special Counsel’s investigation, consistent with the law.

At 11:00 this morning, I will transmit copies of a public version of the Special Counsel’s report to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. The Department of Justice will also make the report available to the American public by posting it on the Department’s website after it has been delivered to Congress.

I would like to offer a few comments today on the report.

But before I do that, I want to thank Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for joining me here today and for his assistance and counsel throughout this process. Rod has served the Department of Justice for many years with dedication and distinction, and it has been a great privilege and pleasure to work with him since my confirmation. He had well-deserved plans to step back from public service that I interrupted by asking him to help in my transition. Rod has been an invaluable partner, and I am grateful that he was willing to help me and has been able to see the Special Counsel’s investigation to its conclusion. Thank you, Rod.

I would also like to thank Special Counsel Mueller for his service and the thoroughness of his investigation, particularly his work exposing the nature of Russia’s attempts to interfere in our electoral process.

As you know, one of the primary purposes of the Special Counsel’s investigation was to determine whether members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, or any individuals associated with that campaign, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.

Volume I of the Special Counsel’s report describes the results of that investigation. As you will see, the Special Counsel’s report states that his “investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election. As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

The Special Counsel’s report outlines two main efforts by the Russian government to influence the 2016 election:

First, the report details efforts by the Internet Research Agency, a Russian company with close ties to the Russian government, to sow social discord among American voters through disinformation and social media operations.

Following a thorough investigation of this disinformation campaign, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian nationals and entities for their respective roles in this scheme. Those charges remain pending, and the individual defendants remain at large.

But the Special Counsel found no evidence that any Americans – including anyone associated with the Trump campaign – conspired or coordinated with the Russian government or the IRA in carrying out this illegal scheme.

Indeed, as the report states, “[t]he investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.” Put another way, the Special Counsel found no “collusion” by any Americans in the IRA’s illegal activity.

Second, the report details efforts by Russian military officials associated with the GRU to hack into computers and steal documents and emails from individuals affiliated with the Democratic Party and the presidential campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton for the purpose of eventually publicizing those emails. Obtaining such unauthorized access into computers is a federal crime.

Following a thorough investigation of these hacking operations, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian military officers for their respective roles in these illegal hacking activities. Those charges are still pending and the defendants remain at large.

But again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations. In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet. The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication. Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.

The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts. Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy. Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign. After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line. After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

After finding no underlying collusion with Russia, the Special Counsel’s report goes on to consider whether certain actions of the President could amount to obstruction of the Special Counsel’s investigation. As I addressed in my March 24th letter, the Special Counsel did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment regarding this allegation. Instead, the report recounts ten episodes involving the President and discusses potential legal theories for connecting these actions to elements of an obstruction offense.

After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Although the Deputy Attorney General and I disagreed with some of the Special Counsel’s legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law, we did not rely solely on that in making our decision. Instead, we accepted the Special Counsel’s legal framework for purposes of our analysis and evaluated the evidence as presented by the Special Counsel in reaching our conclusion.

In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation. As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.

Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.

Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Now, before I take questions, I want to address a few aspects of the process for producing the public report that I am releasing today. As I said several times, the report contains limited redactions relating to four categories of information. To ensure as much transparency as possible, these redactions have been clearly labelled and color-coded so that readers can tell which redactions correspond to which categories.

As you will see, most of the redactions were compelled by the need to prevent harm to ongoing matters and to comply with court orders prohibiting the public disclosure of information bearing upon ongoing investigations and criminal cases, such as the IRA case and the Roger Stone case.

These redactions were applied by Department of Justice attorneys working closely together with attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, as well as with the intelligence community, and prosecutors who are handling ongoing cases. The redactions are their work product.

Consistent with long-standing Executive Branch practice, the decision whether to assert Executive privilege over any portion of the report rested with the President of the United States. Because the White House voluntarily cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, significant portions of the report contain material over which the President could have asserted privilege. And he would have been well within his rights to do so.

Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice. Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report. Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege.

In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released. That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication. The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions.

In addition to making the redacted report public, we are also committed to working with Congress to accommodate their legitimate oversight interests with respect to the Special Counsel’s investigation. We have been consulting with Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler throughout this process, and we will continue to do so.

Given the limited nature of the redactions, I believe that the publicly released report will allow every American to understand the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation. Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate congressional requests, we will make available to a bipartisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information. Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves – with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared.

I believe that this accommodation, together with my upcoming testimony before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, will satisfy any need Congress has for information regarding the Special Counsel’s investigation.

Once again, I would like to thank you all for being here today. I now have a few minutes for questions."

=====================================================================================================

As you can see that AG Barr was fair and consistent with disclosure rules he was operating under. President Trump never used Executive privilege at all against the report. What the public see is what is allowed to be seen by law.

Anyone can pull that up in a heartbeat. What's the bottom line, what is your point?

 

[DJT for Life]

This is the OFFICIAL Mueller Report thread.


Please put all threads about the Mueller Report here.

Mueller Report threads not in this thread could end up being deleted.

there it is boys,, read a weep! No collusion no obstruction right from the horses mouth!

He said the Trump campaign didn’t knowingly collude with the Russians.

But one thing they all agree on, is that Vladimir Putin worked hard to get Trump elected president.

Everybody can agree on that, even Republicans.

Putin didn't work as hard as Hillary to get Trump elected.

 

[Zorro!]

Dirty Bob Mueller tries to reverse the burden of proof:

The most remarkable thing about Dirty Bob Mueller’s 448-page report is how blithely the prosecutor reversed the burden of proof on the issue of obstruction.

The president could have shut down the investigation at any time, but he didn’t. He could have asserted executive privilege to deny the special counsel access to key White House witnesses, such as McGahn. To the contrary, numerous witnesses were made available voluntarily (there was no need to even subpoena them to the grand jury), and well over a million documents were disclosed, including voluminous notes of meetings between the president and his White House counsel.

Most important, the special counsel found that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and that the president’s frustration was that the investigation was undermining his ability to govern the country. The existence of such a motive is a strong counter to evidence of a corrupt intent, critical because corrupt intent must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in an obstruction case.

Idiot, Trump ordered McGhan to fire Mueller - no very co-operative, is it now?

He was blowing off steam .. go away

Why didn’t he “blow off some steam” by walking out and shooting someone in broad day light?

I don’t give a shit what you call that behavior, I call it plain-Jane Obstruction.

You realize he could have fired mueller if he wanted lol he had every right.. lol poor guy

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

BOB BARR, the adult in the room.

 

[Jitss617]

 

[Zorro!]

Boom! Barr publicly shits himself yet again. Gets caught misrepresenting the report.

Dirty Bob Mueller tries to reverse the burden of proof:

The most remarkable thing about Dirty Bob Mueller’s 448-page report is how blithely the prosecutor reversed the burden of proof on the issue of obstruction.

The president could have shut down the investigation at any time, but he didn’t. He could have asserted executive privilege to deny the special counsel access to key White House witnesses, such as McGahn. To the contrary, numerous witnesses were made available voluntarily (there was no need to even subpoena them to the grand jury), and well over a million documents were disclosed, including voluminous notes of meetings between the president and his White House counsel.

Most important, the special counsel found that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and that the president’s frustration was that the investigation was undermining his ability to govern the country. The existence of such a motive is a strong counter to evidence of a corrupt intent, critical because corrupt intent must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in an obstruction case.

Idiot, Trump ordered McGhan to fire Mueller - no very co-operative, is it now?

He was blowing off steam .. go away

Why didn’t he “blow off some steam” by walking out and shooting someone in broad day light?

I don’t give a shit what you call that behavior, I call it plain-Jane Obstruction.

You realize he could have fired mueller if he wanted lol he had every right.. lol poor guy

Hash But Fair:

 

[Zorro!]

Mueller had his chance and he came up dry. This is just butthurt damage control.

BOOM! NOT GUILTY!…….. AG Bill Barr: “NO EVIDENCE of Trump Campaign Collusion with Russia”

Boom! Barr publicly shits himself yet again. Gets caught misrepresenting the report.

Dirty Bob Mueller tries to reverse the burden of proof:

The most remarkable thing about Dirty Bob Mueller’s 448-page report is how blithely the prosecutor reversed the burden of proof on the issue of obstruction.

The president could have shut down the investigation at any time, but he didn’t. He could have asserted executive privilege to deny the special counsel access to key White House witnesses, such as McGahn. To the contrary, numerous witnesses were made available voluntarily (there was no need to even subpoena them to the grand jury), and well over a million documents were disclosed, including voluminous notes of meetings between the president and his White House counsel.

Most important, the special counsel found that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and that the president’s frustration was that the investigation was undermining his ability to govern the country. The existence of such a motive is a strong counter to evidence of a corrupt intent, critical because corrupt intent must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in an obstruction case.

Idiot, Trump ordered McGhan to fire Mueller - noy very co-operative, is it now?

Mueller can’t convict Trump As per DOJ guidelines, nor can he provide deregulatory statements about criminality since he is not bringing charges. So what they felt they are down to is simply presenting the evidence.

Evidence of blowing off steam.. yea got cha.. you sleep well tonight haha

Well Known Liar Brian Williams Smears AG Barr as ‘Baghdad Bill.’

Why on earth would Brian Williams of all people reference someone who famously lied his head off about the Iraq War?

 

[Leo123]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

Nobody was obstructed. How clear do I have to make it? No obstruction no collusion. Live with it. Get some Preperation H.

 

[Zorro!]

Boom! The collusion conspiracy theory has been obliterated by the Mueller report



“These facts are fatal to the conspiracy theorists…”

 

[Markle]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.

There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

What did President Trump DO? Who was fired?

 

[Leo123]

Trump-Russia collusion is over. Now let's go get Hillary.