Official Mueller Report Thread

[AntonToo]

I love the way the Conservative members here read the report and can understand it, while the Left does nothing but post links to spin articles. It's almost like they need someone tell them what they think...

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

 

[AntonToo]

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice


Under applicable Supreme Court precedent, the Constitution does not categorically and permanently immunize a President for obstructing justice through the use of his Article II powers . The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those of courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source. We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President's ability to fulfill his constitutional mission. The term "corruptly " sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. A preclusion of "corrupt" official action does not diminish the President's ability to exercise Article II powers. For example, the proper supervision of criminal law does not demand freedom for the President to act with a corrupt intention of shielding himself from criminal punishment, avoiding financial liability, or preventing personal embarrassment. To the contrary, a statute that prohibits official action undertaken for such corrupt purposes furthers, rather than hinders, the impartial and even handed administration of the law. It also aligns with the President's constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws. Finally, we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President's conduct is justified, inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties. The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.

"MIGHT have obstructed justice"

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

 

[hunarcy]

I love the way the Conservative members here read the report and can understand it, while the Left does nothing but post links to spin articles. It's almost like they need someone tell them what they think...

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Funny how you keep posting the same speculation but can't provide any proof of anything.

 

[AntonToo]

I love the way the Conservative members here read the report and can understand it, while the Left does nothing but post links to spin articles. It's almost like they need someone tell them what they think...

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Funny how you keep posting the same speculation but can't provide any proof of anything.

"speculation"? Moron, it's the report you claimed to have read!

 

[hunarcy]

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice


Under applicable Supreme Court precedent, the Constitution does not categorically and permanently immunize a President for obstructing justice through the use of his Article II powers . The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those of courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source. We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President's ability to fulfill his constitutional mission. The term "corruptly " sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. A preclusion of "corrupt" official action does not diminish the President's ability to exercise Article II powers. For example, the proper supervision of criminal law does not demand freedom for the President to act with a corrupt intention of shielding himself from criminal punishment, avoiding financial liability, or preventing personal embarrassment. To the contrary, a statute that prohibits official action undertaken for such corrupt purposes furthers, rather than hinders, the impartial and even handed administration of the law. It also aligns with the President's constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws. Finally, we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President's conduct is justified, inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties. The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.

"MIGHT have obstructed justice"

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

Funny to see a person whose obsession has robbed him of ALL credibility calling names because he has no argument.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice


Under applicable Supreme Court precedent, the Constitution does not categorically and permanently immunize a President for obstructing justice through the use of his Article II powers . The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those of courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source. We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President's ability to fulfill his constitutional mission. The term "corruptly " sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. A preclusion of "corrupt" official action does not diminish the President's ability to exercise Article II powers. For example, the proper supervision of criminal law does not demand freedom for the President to act with a corrupt intention of shielding himself from criminal punishment, avoiding financial liability, or preventing personal embarrassment. To the contrary, a statute that prohibits official action undertaken for such corrupt purposes furthers, rather than hinders, the impartial and even handed administration of the law. It also aligns with the President's constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws. Finally, we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President's conduct is justified, inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties. The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.

"MIGHT have obstructed justice"

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

Funny to see a person whose obsession has robbed him of ALL credibility calling names because he has no argument.

Nice dodge asshole, come back when you can address what you quoted.

 

[hunarcy]

I love the way the Conservative members here read the report and can understand it, while the Left does nothing but post links to spin articles. It's almost like they need someone tell them what they think...

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice

Funny how you keep posting the same speculation but can't provide any proof of anything.

"speculation"? Moron, it's the report you claimed to have read!

Then why does your article say "might"? Might means it's speculated, not that it's a fact.

Maybe if you hold your breath and stomp your feet, you might be more persuasive.

 

[hunarcy]

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice


Under applicable Supreme Court precedent, the Constitution does not categorically and permanently immunize a President for obstructing justice through the use of his Article II powers . The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those of courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source. We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President's ability to fulfill his constitutional mission. The term "corruptly " sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others. A preclusion of "corrupt" official action does not diminish the President's ability to exercise Article II powers. For example, the proper supervision of criminal law does not demand freedom for the President to act with a corrupt intention of shielding himself from criminal punishment, avoiding financial liability, or preventing personal embarrassment. To the contrary, a statute that prohibits official action undertaken for such corrupt purposes furthers, rather than hinders, the impartial and even handed administration of the law. It also aligns with the President's constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws. Finally, we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President's conduct is justified, inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties. The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President 's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.

"MIGHT have obstructed justice"

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

Funny to see a person whose obsession has robbed him of ALL credibility calling names because he has no argument.

Nice dodge asshole, come back when you can address what you quoted.

No dodge, stupid. I addressed what I quoted. You are the only one avoiding the truth.

 

[Hale]

New contender for Most Triggered TDS Sufferer:

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

Stop talking about shit you are obviously too stupid to talk about.

Did you read what you quoted before copying and posting stupid nonsence?

Will you admit to being a moron when none of that will happen by 2020?

Trump was the President for 2.5 years, with full clearance to see ANY top secret info and a power to make ANY of it public. And yet to this date there is not a single shred of ANYTHING on Obama and his admin,

And yet here you are still sqeezing your blue balls, posting your little fantasy memes.

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

"speculation"? Moron, it's the report you claimed to have read!

Nice dodge asshole, come back when you can address what you quoted.

 

[hunarcy]

New contender for Most Triggered TDS Sufferer:

Hey morons stop saying “no Obstruction” those words are not in the report.

But there is a MOUNTAIN of obstruction evidence and a hand off to Congress to hold Trump responsible from here

Stop talking about shit you are obviously too stupid to talk about.

Did you read what you quoted before copying and posting stupid nonsence?

Will you admit to being a moron when none of that will happen by 2020?

Trump was the President for 2.5 years, with full clearance to see ANY top secret info and a power to make ANY of it public. And yet to this date there is not a single shred of ANYTHING on Obama and his admin,

And yet here you are still sqeezing your blue balls, posting your little fantasy memes.

You haven't read shit, please shut the fuck up untill you do:

Thats right dumbass, Mueller wrote up the evidence and left that determination up to Congress.

"speculation"? Moron, it's the report you claimed to have read!

Nice dodge asshole, come back when you can address what you quoted.

You have to understand...he was so SURE!!!! He can't even recognize speculation because he can't see the world "might" in the title of the article he repeatedly referenced.

 

[AntonToo]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

No sane person would believe any of that was truly obstruction.

You are obviously not sane.

Trump pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Offered promotion for false testimony about directing Flynn to deal with Russians.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Ordered McGhan to lie about the order to fire Mueller.
Implicitly directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

Stop for a second and consider what you would think if this story wasn't about Trump and Russians, but Obama and Iranian Mullahs. No way in hell you would think that this should just be swept under the rug.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Rumor has it that Geo Soros is building TDS Sanitariums in several of the coastal states... Looks to make a killing...

 

[hunarcy]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

No sane person would believe any of that was truly obstruction.

You are obviously not sane.

Pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Offered promotion for false testimony.
Directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

Stop for a second and consider what you would think if this story wasn't about Trump and Russians, but Obama and Iranian Mullahs. No way in hell you would think that this should just be swept under the rug.

Didn't fire Comey to impede the investigation.
Pressuring Sessions to un-recuse was not obstruction.
Firing Sessions did not impede the ivestigation.
Took back the order to fire Mueller because of perceived conflicts of interest.
No proof he offered "promotion for false testimony"
No proof he directed anyone to lie to Congress.

As for the rest of your post, just more speculation with no proof offered. No point taking it seriously.

You're irrational and obviously not very smart.

 

[The Purge]

Will you admit to being a moron when none of that will happen by 2020?

Trump was the President for 2.5 years, with full clearance to see ANY top secret info and a power to make ANY of it public. And yet to this date there is not a single shred of ANYTHING on Obama and his admin,

And yet here you are still sqeezing your blue balls, posting your little fantasy memes.

The IG Horowitz is investigating the Surrender Monkey as we speak, and Barr just said today he is forming a team to look into the dossier......the Manchurian muslim is concerned

 

[Hale]

You are obviously not sane.

Pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Offered promotion for false testimony about directing Flynn to deal with Russians.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Ordered McGhan to lie about the order to fire Mueller.
Implicitly directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

1. Could have stopped the investigation cold at any point, and no one would have any recourse. Didn't.

Game Over. You are delusional.

 

[AntonToo]

You realize he wanted to tell Comey to drop investigation into Flynn...and he did.

You realize he wanted to fire Comey...and he did

You realize he wanted Sessions to unrecuse himself and eventually fired him for not doing it.

You realize he wanted to fire Mueller...gave the order and only backed down when McGhan started packing his shit.


There are TEN such instances - what the fuck else does a guy have to do for it to become a clear pattern of obstruction with corrupt intent?

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

No sane person would believe any of that was truly obstruction.

You are obviously not sane.

Pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Offered promotion for false testimony.
Directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

Stop for a second and consider what you would think if this story wasn't about Trump and Russians, but Obama and Iranian Mullahs. No way in hell you would think that this should just be swept under the rug.

Didn't fire Comey to impede the investigation.

baseless horsecrap


Here is what Trump said next day to Russians in his oval office:

Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation

"I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

Clearly he thought that by removing Comey the pressure from investigation would be off his shoulders.

In his public interview Trump admited that official firing letter was bullshit and he fired Comey "because of Russia thing"

Trump contradicts himself by claiming he didn't fire Comey over the Russia probe

Only to later lie about having said that too.


Stop for a second and ask yourself - why are you here carrying the dirty water for this piece of shit liar?

 

[Leo123]

Made up, baseless horsecrap.


Here is what Trump said next day to Russians in his oval office:

Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation

"I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

Clearly he thought that by removing Comey the pressure from investigation would be off his shoulders.

In his public interview Trump admited that official firing letter was bullshit and he fired Comey "because of Russia thing"

Trump contradicts himself by claiming he didn't fire Comey over the Russia probe

Only to later lie about having said that too.


Why are you here carrying water for this piece of shit liar?

Yes, because Comey let Hillary off by illegally representing the AG he was a threat to not only Trump but the the integrity of the FBI. Why wouldn't Trump want him gone?

 

[AntonToo]

You are obviously not sane.

Pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Offered promotion for false testimony about directing Flynn to deal with Russians.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Ordered McGhan to lie about the order to fire Mueller.
Implicitly directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

1. Could have stopped the investigation cold at any point, and no one would have any recourse. Didn't.

Game Over. You are delusional.

No dummy he could not.

Removing the special council or even Rosenstein would be a ONE WAY EXPRESS TICKET TO IMPEACHMENT.

 

[hunarcy]

400 pages.....no Trump/Russia collusion. No obstruction yet, you still cling to fantasy.

Who told you no Obstuction? Wasn't Mueller.

And I just listed to you a bunch of examples of what any sane person would consider clear attempts of obstruction.

No sane person would believe any of that was truly obstruction.

You are obviously not sane.

Pressured Comey to drop Flynn investigation
Fired Comey.
Pressured Sessions to un-recuse.
Fired Session.
Ordered McGhan to fire Mueller.
Offered promotion for false testimony.
Directed Cohen to lie to Congress.
Urged people to not co-operate with investigators.

If that is not obstruction, then there is no such thing as obstruction and a president can criminally abuse his office with impunity.

Stop for a second and consider what you would think if this story wasn't about Trump and Russians, but Obama and Iranian Mullahs. No way in hell you would think that this should just be swept under the rug.

Didn't fire Comey to impede the investigation.

Made up, baseless horsecrap.


Here is what Trump said next day to Russians in his oval office:

Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation

"I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

Clearly he thought that by removing Comey the pressure from investigation would be off his shoulders.

In his public interview Trump admited that official firing letter was bullshit and he fired Comey "because of Russia thing"

Trump contradicts himself by claiming he didn't fire Comey over the Russia probe

Only to later lie about having said that too.


Why are you here carrying water for this piece of shit liar?

I'm not carrying water for anyone. I'm just not here whining and crying because I didn't get my way and get to read a "Orange man bad" report. You were SO invested in "getting Trump" that you sacrificed all your credibility and apparently your sanity.

Now, read this:

"The President has always emphasized the importance of making deals with Russia as it relates to Syria, Ukraine, defeating ISIS and other key issues for the benefit and safety of the American people. By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia's actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia," Spicer said. "The investigation would have always continued, and obviously, the termination of Comey would not have ended it. Once again, the real story is that our national security has been undermined by the leaking of private and highly classified conversations."

Doesn't seem like they expected the investigation to end, so how is that obstruction, silly one?

 

[hunarcy]

Made up, baseless horsecrap.


Here is what Trump said next day to Russians in his oval office:

Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation

"I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

Clearly he thought that by removing Comey the pressure from investigation would be off his shoulders.

In his public interview Trump admited that official firing letter was bullshit and he fired Comey "because of Russia thing"

Trump contradicts himself by claiming he didn't fire Comey over the Russia probe

Only to later lie about having said that too.


Why are you here carrying water for this piece of shit liar?

Yes, because Comey let Hillary off by illegally representing the AG he was a threat to not only Trump but the the integrity of the FBI. Why wouldn't Trump want him gone?

Careful...that kind of makes it sound that the one obstructing justice was Comey.