Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.no, no, show us the flashlight light hitting the sun.still no proof that flashlight does that. hmmmmmm why not?He's even changed his view on work.
Now he doesn't believe photons from a flashlight can hit the hotter surface of the Sun.
What a clown.
Forcefields? Magnetic photon repulsion?
Tell us your secret!!
What stops them? Post your theory.
just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.no, no, show us the flashlight light hitting the sun.still no proof that flashlight does that. hmmmmmm why not?
Forcefields? Magnetic photon repulsion?
Tell us your secret!!
What stops them? Post your theory.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.no, no, show us the flashlight light hitting the sun.Forcefields? Magnetic photon repulsion?
Tell us your secret!!
What stops them? Post your theory.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.no, no, show us the flashlight light hitting the sun.
What stops them? Post your theory.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.What stops them? Post your theory.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
unobserved, all you ever got bubba.you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do? come on big guy stand up and show that light hitting the sun.
why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
unobserved, all you ever got bubba.you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.why do you feel you are resolved of showing us that they do?
Photons travel in a straight line until they're absorbed by matter.
Photons from my flashlight can travel billions of light years across the universe.
Why the fuck wouldn't they hit the Sun if I aimed them properly?
Come on big guy, use that brain of yours.
So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
show the experiment.unobserved, all you ever got bubba.you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.just show us that it would hit the sun, why can't you? you claim they would I'm waiting.
So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
No photon was ever observed. Right.
show the experiment.unobserved, all you ever got bubba.you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.So no theory?
Maybe you should ask Billy_Boy?
He had some idiocy about "Covailent [sic] bonds" generating a force field or some such shit.
Or SSDD can explain that the flashlight "simply cannot emit toward hotter matter" or some such idiocy.
Be sure to post their theories, can't wait!!!
You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
No photon was ever observed. Right.
I just want you to post the experiment you claimed was done. go for it.show the experiment.unobserved, all you ever got bubba.you still don't think you owe to back your claim. funny shit. thanks for yet another laugh on a different day.
You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
No photon was ever observed. Right.
I get it, you have zero understanding of how photons behave. That's okay, you've survived this long
without a clue. Don't worry about it.
I just want you to post the experiment you claimed was done. go for it.show the experiment.unobserved, all you ever got bubba.You're right, I don't have to back my claim that photons can travel from my flashlight and hit the Sun.
I'm glad basic physics gives you a laugh.
No photon was ever observed. Right.
I get it, you have zero understanding of how photons behave. That's okay, you've survived this long
without a clue. Don't worry about it.
I don't, but I do have images of you pointing your flashlight at the sun trying to warm it up.I just want you to post the experiment you claimed was done. go for it.show the experiment.unobserved, all you ever got bubba.
No photon was ever observed. Right.
I get it, you have zero understanding of how photons behave. That's okay, you've survived this long
without a clue. Don't worry about it.
Don't you worry your pretty little head.
I don't, but I do have images of you pointing your flashlight at the sun trying to warm it up.I just want you to post the experiment you claimed was done. go for it.show the experiment.No photon was ever observed. Right.
I get it, you have zero understanding of how photons behave. That's okay, you've survived this long
without a clue. Don't worry about it.
Don't you worry your pretty little head.
heavens no, I laugh at anyone standing and holding a flashlight to warm the sun.I don't, but I do have images of you pointing your flashlight at the sun trying to warm it up.I just want you to post the experiment you claimed was done. go for it.show the experiment.
I get it, you have zero understanding of how photons behave. That's okay, you've survived this long
without a clue. Don't worry about it.
Don't you worry your pretty little head.
I know, the list of things that confuse you grows longer every day, but don't you worry.
I know you don't.
Don't you worry about science.
There is no such thing as "net flow"... A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.
Here's that form of the Second Law that you copied from. You left a bit of it out.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
---
Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This precludes a perfect refrigerator. The statements about refrigerators apply to air conditioners and heat pumps, which embody the same principles.
This is the "second form" or Clausius statement of the second law.
It is important to note that when it is stated that energy will not spontaneously flow from a cold object to a hot object, that statement is referring to net transfer of energy. Energy can transfer from the cold object to the hot object either by transfer of energetic particles or electromagnetic radiation, but the net transfer will be from the hot object to the cold object in any spontaneous process. Work is required to transfer net energy to the hot object."
---
It was astonishingly dishonest of you to leave that part out. It flatly contradicts your idiot claims, and it flat out says we're right.
So, you know you're lying here, yet you continue to lie. At this stage, the only purpose you serve is to illustrate how cult devotion leads to moral decrepitude.
There is no such thing as "net flow"... A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.
Here's that form of the Second Law that you copied from. You left a bit of it out.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
---
Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This precludes a perfect refrigerator. The statements about refrigerators apply to air conditioners and heat pumps, which embody the same principles.
This is the "second form" or Clausius statement of the second law.
It is important to note that when it is stated that energy will not spontaneously flow from a cold object to a hot object, that statement is referring to net transfer of energy. Energy can transfer from the cold object to the hot object either by transfer of energetic particles or electromagnetic radiation, but the net transfer will be from the hot object to the cold object in any spontaneous process. Work is required to transfer net energy to the hot object."
---
It was astonishingly dishonest of you to leave that part out. It flatly contradicts your idiot claims, and it flat out says we're right.
So, you know you're lying here, yet you continue to lie. At this stage, the only purpose you serve is to illustrate how cult devotion leads to moral decrepitude.
dude, it's been explained to you over an over again, 2nd law thing you just can't seem to absorb. get it? absorbed? hahahaahaha what a boob you are.There is no such thing as "net flow"... A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.
Here's that form of the Second Law that you copied from. You left a bit of it out.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
---
Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This precludes a perfect refrigerator. The statements about refrigerators apply to air conditioners and heat pumps, which embody the same principles.
This is the "second form" or Clausius statement of the second law.
It is important to note that when it is stated that energy will not spontaneously flow from a cold object to a hot object, that statement is referring to net transfer of energy. Energy can transfer from the cold object to the hot object either by transfer of energetic particles or electromagnetic radiation, but the net transfer will be from the hot object to the cold object in any spontaneous process. Work is required to transfer net energy to the hot object."
---
It was astonishingly dishonest of you to leave that part out. It flatly contradicts your idiot claims, and it flat out says we're right.
So, you know you're lying here, yet you continue to lie. At this stage, the only purpose you serve is to illustrate how cult devotion leads to moral decrepitude.
There is no such thing as "net flow"...
A 10C object is prohibited from radiating toward a 20C object? Why?
Force fields? Smart photons? What?
A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.
While the 10C object radiates toward the 20C object, the 20C object radiates MORE toward the 10C object.
They BOTH radiate, but the cooler object warms while the warmer object cools.
Because "net flow".
dude, it's been explained to you over an over again, 2nd law thing you just can't seem to absorb. get it? absorbed? hahahaahaha what a boob you are.There is no such thing as "net flow"... A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.
Here's that form of the Second Law that you copied from. You left a bit of it out.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
---
Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This precludes a perfect refrigerator. The statements about refrigerators apply to air conditioners and heat pumps, which embody the same principles.
This is the "second form" or Clausius statement of the second law.
It is important to note that when it is stated that energy will not spontaneously flow from a cold object to a hot object, that statement is referring to net transfer of energy. Energy can transfer from the cold object to the hot object either by transfer of energetic particles or electromagnetic radiation, but the net transfer will be from the hot object to the cold object in any spontaneous process. Work is required to transfer net energy to the hot object."
---
It was astonishingly dishonest of you to leave that part out. It flatly contradicts your idiot claims, and it flat out says we're right.
So, you know you're lying here, yet you continue to lie. At this stage, the only purpose you serve is to illustrate how cult devotion leads to moral decrepitude.
There is no such thing as "net flow"...
A 10C object is prohibited from radiating toward a 20C object? Why?
Force fields? Smart photons? What?
A colder body cannot warm a hotter body.
While the 10C object radiates toward the 20C object, the 20C object radiates MORE toward the 10C object.
They BOTH radiate, but the cooler object warms while the warmer object cools.
Because "net flow".
anyway, you still haven't presented observed empirical evidence that it does what you said. you have been losing this battle for over three years now.
Hey you still trying to warm the sun with your flashlight?
