Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's liberal speak like " War on Women". They want the votes. They have labored hard convincing women that they should be able to have sex without having to worry about the consequences. They don't want to lose those votes
they don't like to have pointed out how they are two faced hyocrites... they wail we need gun control for the children then sit here and whine about ANY control on abortions which kill more children each day than guns do..
that is why to some I AM the one filled with hate...cracks me up
That's total bs - almost no one supports late term abortion unless the mother's in danger or there are severe fetal defects.
No, what you find is NO MENTION of abortion in the consitution, and thus legislative oversight via the State governments is mandated as the way to regulate it, or not regulate it.
Abortion on demand is not consitutional, it is not unconsitutional. THe document is neutral on the topic, and thus the obvious place it should be handled is the state legislatures.
No, because then you're sanctioning the invasion of a woman's privacy. Without personhood protections for the fetus, there is no compelling State interest in denying a woman her right to privacy.
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
Avatar will never ascend to my level. I believe in individual freedom. You right wing statists believe a woman's uterus should be the property of the STATE. You are authoritarians, not caring human beings...
Avatar won't descend to your level. LET ME DO IT FOR THEM!!!!
Go fornicate yourself with a rust crusted tire iron you moronic progressive fucktard.
Avatar will never ascend to my level. I believe in individual freedom. You right wing statists believe a woman's uterus should be the property of the STATE. You are authoritarians, not caring human beings...
Seriously--this "uterus" meme has gotta stop. It's laughable and inaccurate. Even libs are aware that it's about the fetus.
Seriously--this "uterus" meme has gotta stop. It's laughable and inaccurate. Even libs are aware that it's about the fetus.
No, what you find is NO MENTION of abortion in the consitution, and thus legislative oversight via the State governments is mandated as the way to regulate it, or not regulate it.
Abortion on demand is not consitutional, it is not unconsitutional. THe document is neutral on the topic, and thus the obvious place it should be handled is the state legislatures.
No one is killing a child. THAT is always the lie you right wing turds use to justify state ownership of a woman's uterus.
The abortion LAW is based on viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
The law is extremely fair. If you don't want to have an abortion, no one is forcing you to have one. If your wife, daughter or family member is contemplating having an abortion, you have the right to speak your mind or try to intervene. If my wife, daughter or family member is contemplating having an abortion, it is none of your fucking business.
No BFG, the fact is, killing a child is killing a child and many abortions occur after viability, so are you saying those people are murderers?
I'm saying once conception happens you have a person, it may not look like a person, but it is, because if you dont kill it, it becomes you, if your mother had an abortion, then you wouldnt be posting your bullshit on here, because you'd be dead.
Now quit the lie of we want to own a womens uterus, why would we want that?
"Now quit the lie of we want to own a womens uterus, why would we want that?"
I don't know, yet here you are telling women what they can do with their uterus.
No, because then you're sanctioning the invasion of a woman's privacy. Without personhood protections for the fetus, there is no compelling State interest in denying a woman her right to privacy.
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
No, because then you're sanctioning the invasion of a woman's privacy. Without personhood protections for the fetus, there is no compelling State interest in denying a woman her right to privacy.
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
No, what you find is NO MENTION of abortion in the consitution, and thus legislative oversight via the State governments is mandated as the way to regulate it, or not regulate it.
Abortion on demand is not consitutional, it is not unconsitutional. THe document is neutral on the topic, and thus the obvious place it should be handled is the state legislatures.
No, because then you're sanctioning the invasion of a woman's privacy. Without personhood protections for the fetus, there is no compelling State interest in denying a woman her right to privacy.
Privacy does not equal abortion, no matter how hard you try to connect the dots.
On second thought, where is the right to privacy in the consitution?
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
There is no Constitutional right to murder your own baby. There is a law, but it does not mean it is a Right to murder your own baby.
A murder is a murder even if it is not criminalized.
And should be called so.
And every move to restrict that murder - is VERY GOOD.
No one is killing a child. THAT is always the lie you right wing turds use to justify state ownership of a woman's uterus.
The abortion LAW is based on viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
The law is extremely fair. If you don't want to have an abortion, no one is forcing you to have one. If your wife, daughter or family member is contemplating having an abortion, you have the right to speak your mind or try to intervene. If my wife, daughter or family member is contemplating having an abortion, it is none of your fucking business.
Yeah they are. You can lie about it to yourself all you want. But the second conception occurs there is a new independent human being growing. Abortion ends the life of that human being. It doesn't matter what you try to claim, the child is alive and abortion kills it.
You've already demonstrated you haven't read Roe.
And yes, some of these organizations like planned parenthood take tax payer money and use it to pressure women into abortion at a time in their life when they are emotionally vulnerable.
And as long as abortion kills children, it will always be my business. You may forsake your responsibility to others, even your kin, but I cannot.
Stick your high and mighty crap right back from it came from...your ass.
You right wing statists don't give a shit about the crawling or walking, and we're supposed to believe you care about an egg?
And you are a lying sack of shit. And keep your nose out of people's crotches.
No, because then you're sanctioning the invasion of a woman's privacy. Without personhood protections for the fetus, there is no compelling State interest in denying a woman her right to privacy.
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
There is no Constitutional right to murder your own baby. There is a law, but it does not mean it is a Right to murder your own baby.
A murder is a murder even if it is not criminalized.
And should be called so.
And every move to restrict that murder - is VERY GOOD.
Actually there is. Roe v. Wade establishes the right of abortion in certain cases.
If you think abortion is wrong, then don't have one.
No kidding, bor doesnt understand how stupid his arguement is....so he must be for prostitution, and if youre not pro heroin use, you must want to control peoples veins......what a dumbass try at logic.......i mean a 6th grader knows betterNo BFG, the fact is, killing a child is killing a child and many abortions occur after viability, so are you saying those people are murderers?
I'm saying once conception happens you have a person, it may not look like a person, but it is, because if you dont kill it, it becomes you, if your mother had an abortion, then you wouldnt be posting your bullshit on here, because you'd be dead.
Now quit the lie of we want to own a womens uterus, why would we want that?
"Now quit the lie of we want to own a womens uterus, why would we want that?"
I don't know, yet here you are telling women what they can do with their uterus.
They already made a choice for their uterus.
Stick your high and mighty crap right back from it came from...your ass.
You right wing statists don't give a shit about the crawling or walking, and we're supposed to believe you care about an egg?
And you are a lying sack of shit. And keep your nose out of people's crotches.
Avatar won't descend to your level. LET ME DO IT FOR THEM!!!!
Go fornicate yourself with a rust crusted tire iron you moronic progressive fucktard.
Avatar will never ascend to my level. I believe in individual freedom. You right wing statists believe a woman's uterus should be the property of the STATE. You are authoritarians, not caring human beings...
Abortion is nothing more than a medical procedure to remove a portion of a woman's body, a portion that as you have agreed, holds no constitutional rights of personhood.
Just as I am secure in the privacy of my own home without the State having cause to invade that privacy,
a woman is secure in the privacy of her own body without the State having cause to invade that privacy.
Abortion is nothing more than a medical procedure to remove a portion of a woman's body, a portion that as you have agreed, holds no constitutional rights of personhood.
Just as I am secure in the privacy of my own home without the State having cause to invade that privacy,
a woman is secure in the privacy of her own body without the State having cause to invade that privacy.
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
There is no Constitutional right to murder your own baby. There is a law, but it does not mean it is a Right to murder your own baby.
A murder is a murder even if it is not criminalized.
And should be called so.
And every move to restrict that murder - is VERY GOOD.
Actually there is. Roe v. Wade establishes the right of abortion in certain cases.
If you think abortion is wrong, then don't have one.
Privacy has nothing to do with the woman wanting to murder her baby
It does constitutionally when there are no explicit or implicit rights of personhood given to the unborn in the Constiution.
If you want to convict women of murder for having abortions, you first have to establish that the fetus was a person. That would require a constitutional amendment.
You dont have to convict a woman of murder, you just make the procedure illegal. Class A misdemeanor or low level felony and be done with it.
