Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The time for investigation had passed? Is that why election records and data are by law required to be held for 22 months after the election? Try again you stupid troll.
No I am not. Your piss poor excuses are irrelevant to the case we are discussing.LOLOL
You're digging your grave even deeper, FruitLoops.
Now you're admitting the Republican-led Senate spent nearly 2 years NOT investigating the "crimes" you claim not investigating amounts to treason.
You are saying violating the oath of office is not
Ask the Brunson brothers. Do you think the Supreme Court will try and use that excuse?
One more time, this is not about the Republican Senate. Do you see them mentioned in the petition? Yes or no Einstein?
You know what if they do throw it out they throw out the Constitution with it. That means it is only a matter of time until dissenters are lined up and shot.I am saying nobody violated their oath of office. So far all the courts agree with my view and not yours.
What will be your next step after the SCOTUS throws this case out?
Where will you turn to then? Will it be time for an armed revolution?
You know what if they do throw it out they throw out the Constitution with it. That means it is only a matter of time until dissenters are lined up and shot.
How is it possibly meritless. An investigation was the correct thing to do. Anyone with a brain, even a very small one, knows why it was not.Not at all, the SCOTUS does not need an excuse, they will just dismiss with as meritless and move on.
I know an investigation by Congress was called for by members of Congress who represent a lot of people. True or false?
No I am not. Your piss poor excuses are irrelevant to the case we are discussing.
Are you trying to get me to say something so you can say I am promoting violence? No cigar, hack.Then you all should strike first, what are you waiting for?
How is it possibly meritless. An investigation was the correct thing to do. Anyone with a brain, even a very small one, knows why it was not.
Are you trying to get me to say something so you can say I am promoting violence? No cigar, hack.
Because I do not have to explain it, haven't you? You get dumber by the minute.LOLOL
You're not discussing the case. You don't understand what's happening.
You still can't explain why you think the Supreme Court won't throw this case out due to lack of merit and lack of standing.
You know what if they do throw it out they throw out the Constitution with it. That means it is only a matter of time until dissenters are lined up and shot.
So 1/4 of the voters who these members of Congress represent were not owed an investigation? In Communist China, no. In America yes. You have no argument.Once again, this is just your opinion. No investigation was needed nor required. So far not one single court in the land agrees with you.
Nope, I am highlighting the uselessness of all the whining you do on this forum. If I believed the things you post on here and claim to believe are true, I would not be wasting my time on some minor website.
Yet all you do is post on here about it and whine when the courts laugh at you again.
Because I do not have to explain it, haven't you? You get dumber by the minute.
Fascist was not investigating the election.How fascist of you.
YOU decide what someone did is traitorous.
After our justice system clears them of such a crime (assuming the SCOTUS denies cert), you still want them executed.
You're out of your fucking mind, FruitLoops.
YOU are the enemy of America that YOU project upon others.
Are you even an American?
Rational enough to get to the SC.LOLOL
Because you can't. Because there is no rational for your bullshit claims. Your inability to explain it reveals even you know you're wrong and you're going to lose this one too.
How is it possibly meritless.
Again, there is no immunity for traitors. Do you seriously think the SC will say there is?Mr. Brunson’s claims against defendant members of Congress and former Vice President Pence, alleging failure to investigate election fraud prior to accepting the electoral college votes, are also likely barred by absolute legislative immunity under the Speech or Debate clause ofthe Constitution. Article I, section 6 of the Constitution provides: “The Senators and Representatives ... for any speech or Debate in either House, ... shall not be questioned in any other Place.” This clause affords Members of Congress absolute immunity from all claims arising out of their conduct in the legislative sphere. See, e.g., Rockefeller v. Bingaman, 234 F. App’x 852, 855 (10th Cir.) (holding that Speech or Debate immunity barred suit challenging the “decision of individual Congressmen not to take legislative action in response to [plaintiffs] prompts”), cert, denied, 552 U.S. 1022 (2007); see also Rangel v. Boehner, 785 F.3d 19, 23 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (providing that the “Supreme Court has consistently read the Speech or Debate Clause ‘broadly’ to achieve its purposes”)
