one nation, under god

Sure have. TJ did not understand Jesus Christ to be more or less than the perfectly moral who ever lived. TJ did not believe in miracles, the Virgin Birth, the resurrection, or wicked priestcraft.

----- Jefferson to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, June 26, 1822
Dear Sir,- I have received and read with thankfulness and pleasure your denunciation of the abuses of tobacco and wine. Yet, however sound in its principles, I expect it will be but a sermon to the wind. You will find it as difficult to inculcate these sanative precepts on the sensualities of the present day, as to convince an Athanasian that there is but one God. I wish success to both attempts, and am happy to learn from you that the latter, at least, is making progress, and the more rapidly in proportion as our Platonizing Christians make more stir and noise about it. The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.

1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.
2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.
3. That to love God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of religion

No doubts that TJ believed in God. He did not believe it was the Christian God. You will find no statement of witness or conviction.

He believed there was but one God.

Does Christians have a different God?

If so then he believes in two Gods, his and the Christian God.

So did he lie when he said he believes there is only one God?
 
ACTON (CBS) – The Pledge of Allegiance is becoming a sore subject in the Acton-Boxborough school district, all because of the words “under God.”

“Atheists and Humanists do not accept the notion of God,” says attorney David Niose.

An Acton family, who is atheist and chooses to remain anonymous, is suing the school district claiming they are discriminating against their children during the pledge. They want the words “under God” taken out

Acton Family Wants “Under God” Removed From Pledge Of Allegiance « CBS Boston

thoughts?

So many Individual Delusional people in this Nation, Under so many Delusional God's
Make this so fun watching all the true Delusional Believers.. I think this is called being USED!
 
The difference between founder's belief in a supreme being / creator and yours is that they did not have the benefit of the scientific proof regarding evolutionary biolgy. You have it....but pretend it does not exist.
 
He also said he was a Christian, a sect of one. :lol: He has to be read in the context of his writings and of the Age of Enlightenment.

Epicureanism and Christianity are not compatible since Epicureans believe that the soul dies with the body.

You are looking for consistency in TJ's writings?

You tell me if it's possible to be Christian if a person doesn't accept that the soul lives on after the body dies? Correct me if I'm wrong, but in modern Christian theology, after physical death the soul either goes to heaven as an eternal reward (based on the confession of a sin nature and accepting Jesus as one's personal savior) or to hell for eternal damnation.

TJ may have been an idealist in his political views, but he was a intellectual realist and a pragmatist when it came to examining the way the natural world worked. Epicureanism appealed to that nature, and I don't believe his thinking was in keeping with the Christian religion. Additionally, I don't think Christians COULD consider TJ to be a Christian considering the beliefs he held. That doesn't mean he didn't believe in a God (or gods), but that alone wouldn't make him a Christian.
 
Socialists/Progressives are such assholes. All that snotty hateful Anti-Christian stuff has gotten so old and tiresome. This lawsuit is such Bullshit. I really do hope these people are made to reimburse the community when they lose. It's ridiculous & frivolous.
They're being excluded due to gov't endorsement of religion dummy.
Current case law maintains that ‘under god’ is Constitutional, that Congress’ intent was secular, and not intended to promote religion.

Pledge of Allegiance in Schools Ruled Constitutional on Appeal - Bloomberg

Of course children can not be compelled to say the pledge, nor may they be punished for wishing to opt out. See:
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette

This can prove problematic for a child, needless to say, as already pointed out. But the suit is likely to fail, unfortunately.

I read a story in the paper where a young girl had to go stand out in the hallway so the drones could recite the "amended" (god added in 1954) pledge. Aint that marvelous? :doubt: It was adopted to counter the red scare. Reminds me of Orwellian group think. Take it out.

If she didn't want to hear something so offensive should should have stood in the hallway in another school.

your way or the highway, right?
 
----- Jefferson to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, June 26, 1822
Dear Sir,- I have received and read with thankfulness and pleasure your denunciation of the abuses of tobacco and wine. Yet, however sound in its principles, I expect it will be but a sermon to the wind. You will find it as difficult to inculcate these sanative precepts on the sensualities of the present day, as to convince an Athanasian that there is but one God. I wish success to both attempts, and am happy to learn from you that the latter, at least, is making progress, and the more rapidly in proportion as our Platonizing Christians make more stir and noise about it. The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.

1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.
2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.
3. That to love God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of religion

he believed in the "doctrines" of jesus... he did not believe in the deification of jesus and had all of the "miracles", etc, removed from the version of the bible he had made for himself.

he said G-d was perfect, not Jesus, which i believe fits with the fact that he was a deist. that's consistent with the above statements, as well, imo.

He believed in God.

more importantly, he believed in someone else's right not to.

funny how you clowns never make that connection
 
for anyone that's curious, here's a good summary...



June 14, 1885 Bernard Cigrand, a teacher, begins observance of "Flag Day"

1888 James Upham's Premium Department The Youth's Companion launches School Flag Movement, a four-year campaign to introduce U.S. flags in school classrooms in order to sell flags and promote patriotism and "Americanism"

June 14, 1889 Colonel Balch introduces an American Flag Salute at his NY kindergarten: “We give our heads and our hearts to God and or country; one country, one language, one Flag”

Summer 1892 Francis Bellamy writes the Pledge of Allegiance as Part 3--Salute to the Flag by the Pupils--of the official "Programme" for the National Public School Celebration of Columbus Day

September 8, 1892 Pledge of Allegiance first appears in print in The Youth's Companion

October 12, 1892 Pledge of Allegiance first recited in unison in public during the first day of the New York City Columbus Day holiday attended mostly by immigrant families

October 21, 1892 Public school children across the country celebrate four-hundredth anniversaryof Columbus Day by saluting the flag and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance for first time

April 25, 1893 At instigation of William McDowell, a leader of patriotic organizations, he, James Upham, and Francis Bellamy lead the first adult recitation of the Pledge at the National Liberty Pole and Flag Raising Ceremony at Navesink, NJ

1894 At its 12th Convention, the Women's Relief Corp, an Auxiliary to the Grand Army of the Republic, recommends that a flag salute be used in public schools

1895 Women's Relief Corp uses salute and Pledge in its patriotic ritual

1898 New York state legislature first in nation to pass statute requiring a flag salute; passed on the day war was declared with Spain

1905 As many as 19 States have passed school flag laws

June 14, 1923 At first National Flag Conference the American Legion is instrumental in changing wording of Pledge from "my flag" to "the flag of the United States"

1924 National Flag Conference adds words "of America"

1939 Sons of American Revolution urge Congress to make the Pledge part of the nation's flag ceremony etiquette

1940 In Minersville School District v. Gobitis, the U.S. Supreme Court upholdsPennsylvania law with opinion that local autonomy in educational policy and nationalunity take precedence over religious beliefs of children, thus requiring two students who were Jehovah's Witnesses, to recite Pledge in school

1942 Flag Code adopted by joint resolution of Congress; salute modified from raised stiff right arm to right hand over the heart

1943 In West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, the U.S. Supreme Court essentially reverses Gobitis and declares unconstitutional state laws compelling public school children to recite Pledge

1954 After a three-year campaign by the Knights of Columbus, President Eisenhowersigns Congressional resolution on June 14, adding wording "under God" to Pledge

1978 In Lipp v Morris,the 3rd Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals, declares unconstitutional a New Jersey law requiring students to stand during the recitationof the Pledge

June 26, 2002 Ninth U.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rules in Newdow v the U.S Congress that words "under God" violate first amendment principle of separation of church and state and endorse religion

June 27, 2002 Justice Goodwin “stays” his ruling about the words “under God” in the Pledge, placing the ruling on hold, pending appeals

June 1, 2002 Houses of Congress and state legislatures pass resolutions condemning the ruling
 
Last edited:
He also said he was a Christian, a sect of one. :lol: He has to be read in the context of his writings and of the Age of Enlightenment.

Epicureanism and Christianity are not compatible since Epicureans believe that the soul dies with the body.

You are looking for consistency in TJ's writings?

If there is one person whose consistency in philosophy and thought never wavered - be it religious, social or political - it was Thomas Jefferson.

And especially so about his religious convictions -

Say nothing of my religion. It is known to my god and myself alone.
-- Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to John Adams
Too bad more in this country don't follow that credo.

Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society. - Thomas Jefferson, to the Virginia Baptists (1808)

Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

Doesn't sound like TJ was conflicted in the least about how he felt about religion, in general, and Christianity, specifically. In fact, none of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were Christians. They did, however, as do billions of people on the planet, believe in God.

Considering this argument won't die regardless of how much written evidence to the contrary is presented, one is left with two possibilities. Either Christians are very insecure about their beliefs or they just simply cannot read.
 
There is no what if's.........

Now, if a child refuses to stand for the pledge then I would say that the teacher has a responsibility to work with the child and the childs parents to teach that child the respect for others in the room.

They shouldn't be forced to say or even learn the pledge, but when it is being said they should at least learn the respect to stand quietly.

I'm sure some of you have a problem with that to. Too bad for you.

So the non-believer should be taught to show respect for the believers, but the believers not taught to show respect for the non-believer.


Somehow that post of yours didn't surprise me.

And how is it showing any disrespect to the non-believer? They can stand there and laugh to themselves for all I would care.

Let me explain with an example. As the current Commander of my local American Legion Post i attend a lot of functions, many times i attend a funeral service in a catholic church. I do not participate in many of their rituals, because it is not my belief. If they get on their knees I sit quietly, when they get in line for their communion or whatever they call it I remain in my place. But I show their religion respect.

Common courtesy. It really does go a long way.

Now should they change their service because someone who believes differently is there?

On Saturday evening i will be hosting an Awards banquet for some of the local HS kids. (In my capacity as Commander) It is not a religious event, and there will be no clergy there. However, we will post the flags and before diner I will ask the Post Chaplain to say grace. I bet that no matter what the religion of those kids might be, they and their parents will stand up for the prayer.

Respect, it really is as simple as that.............

Hey, SFC Oillie Spot, aka: AGENT ORANGE! / Orange Oil!
What is is now a "Commander"... Shit, I gave you a Star Fleet Comodore rank weeks ago, And you bitched at me!..Gee! Are you never happy? And looking at the picture, are you on any list we should know about?:eusa_pray:
 
Epicureanism and Christianity are not compatible since Epicureans believe that the soul dies with the body.

You are looking for consistency in TJ's writings?

If there is one person whose consistency in philosophy and thought never wavered - be it religious, social or political - it was Thomas Jefferson.

And especially so about his religious convictions -

Too bad more in this country don't follow that credo.



Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")
Doesn't sound like TJ was conflicted in the least about how he felt about religion, in general, and Christianity, specifically. In fact, none of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were Christians. They did, however, as do billions of people on the planet, believe in God.

Considering this argument won't die regardless of how much written evidence to the contrary is presented, one is left with two possibilities. Either Christians are very insecure about their beliefs or they just simply cannot read.

Dogmatic Christian lovers of the US Constitution have found themselves in a quandry. How do they pay homage to both. The answer (ala the late Dr D James Kennedy) was to remake the founders in their own image, as devout Christians.
 
What does Jefferson have to do with the subject at hand? He believed there was a God. So???????

Once again, remove the words if the majority wants them removed.

Leave them be if they are to be removed for a small minority. Which seems to be the case.

Unfortunately the majority today won't care unless their handlers tell them to.... Left or right......
 
I believe in God - therefore, everything on Earth is "under God". That works for me... A person has as much right to be an Atheist as I have to be a believer. However, anyone who doesn't believe in God, and finds the term "in God we trust" offensive to them - especially if it's printed on money, can feel free to send me all of their offending money. Getting back to "under God", these days a large number of people don't even remove their hats, or place their hands over their heart when the Pledge is said at public events. It's sickening for me to see this as a person who served in the military for 20 years but I did that to give dullards like that the freedom to do so if they please... However, don't trend on my freedoms just because you think you are being slighted.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
The difference between founder's belief in a supreme being / creator and yours is that they did not have the benefit of the scientific proof regarding evolutionary biolgy. You have it....but pretend it does not exist.

If the founder's were as enlighten as we hold them up to be in their inexperienced, incomplete, compromising works on paper. I can only assume they knew at that time that GOD was completely a bunch of BS!, but forced by the surrounding body of believers, it was better to leave some ambiguity in their written works. As they had the same problems that we all get to enjoy today. How to deal with the ignorant believers in some kind of a god.

Oh..Praise The Load…:oops:... LORD!
:shock:
 
Last edited:
Epicureanism and Christianity are not compatible since Epicureans believe that the soul dies with the body.

You are looking for consistency in TJ's writings?

If there is one person whose consistency in philosophy and thought never wavered - be it religious, social or political - it was Thomas Jefferson. And especially so about his religious convictions - Too bad more in this country don't follow that credo.
Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")
Doesn't sound like TJ was conflicted in the least about how he felt about religion, in general, and Christianity, specifically. In fact, none of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were Christians. They did, however, as do billions of people on the planet, believe in God. Considering this argument won't die regardless of how much written evidence to the contrary is presented, one is left with two possibilities. Either Christians are very insecure about their beliefs or they just simply cannot read.

Don't mistake consistency with confliction. TJ did not write consistently about god, but he was not conflicted in that he believed in a non-Christian god.
 
Epicureanism and Christianity are not compatible since Epicureans believe that the soul dies with the body.

You are looking for consistency in TJ's writings?

If there is one person whose consistency in philosophy and thought never wavered - be it religious, social or political - it was Thomas Jefferson.

And especially so about his religious convictions -

Too bad more in this country don't follow that credo.




Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

Doesn't sound like TJ was conflicted in the least about how he felt about religion, in general, and Christianity, specifically. In fact, none of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were Christians. They did, however, as do billions of people on the planet, believe in God.

Considering this argument won't die regardless of how much written evidence to the contrary is presented, one is left with two possibilities. Either Christians are very insecure about their beliefs or they just simply cannot read.

Absolutely true, too bad to that those who DON'T believe won't likewise shut up.
 
The difference between founder's belief in a supreme being / creator and yours is that they did not have the benefit of the scientific proof regarding evolutionary biolgy. You have it....but pretend it does not exist.

You know something I don't know? I've never seen any proof that God doesn't exist.
 
The difference between founder's belief in a supreme being / creator and yours is that they did not have the benefit of the scientific proof regarding evolutionary biolgy. You have it....but pretend it does not exist.

You know something I don't know? I've never seen any proof that God doesn't exist.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

But you follow the existing works of man to control your life! Great!

Oh..Praise The Load…:oops: LORD!
 
There is no what if's.........

Now, if a child refuses to stand for the pledge then I would say that the teacher has a responsibility to work with the child and the childs parents to teach that child the respect for others in the room.

They shouldn't be forced to say or even learn the pledge, but when it is being said they should at least learn the respect to stand quietly.

I'm sure some of you have a problem with that to. Too bad for you.

So the non-believer should be taught to show respect for the believers, but the believers not taught to show respect for the non-believer.


Somehow that post of yours didn't surprise me.

And how is it showing any disrespect to the non-believer? They can stand there and laugh to themselves for all I would care.

Let me explain with an example. As the current Commander of my local American Legion Post i attend a lot of functions, many times i attend a funeral service in a catholic church. I do not participate in many of their rituals, because it is not my belief. If they get on their knees I sit quietly, when they get in line for their communion or whatever they call it I remain in my place. But I show their religion respect.

Common courtesy. It really does go a long way.

Now should they change their service because someone who believes differently is there?

On Saturday evening i will be hosting an Awards banquet for some of the local HS kids. (In my capacity as Commander) It is not a religious event, and there will be no clergy there. However, we will post the flags and before diner I will ask the Post Chaplain to say grace. I bet that no matter what the religion of those kids might be, they and their parents will stand up for the prayer.

Respect, it really is as simple as that.............
This thread isn't really about standing or sitting for the pledge but I'm curious to know if you consider it respectful to sit while others kneel (in chruch) why isn't it respectful to sit while others stand (in school)?
 
:confused: On pledge for about 60 years....on money about 100 years. Not how we started....seems to me the whiney ones are those that had it CHANGED to get their god some advertising.
"Creator", "God"....same diff

We used to be unafraid to say His name.
Now, with the arrival of extreme PC, we kick Him to the curb.

Not a wise move IMO
"His"? Are you referencing a particular god?
Thomas Jefferson quotes
In spite of right-wing Christian attempts to rewrite history to make Jefferson into a Christian, little about his philosophy resembles that of Christianity. Although Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence wrote of the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, there exists nothing in the Declaration about Christianity. Although Jefferson believed in a Creator, his concept of it resembled that of the god of deism (the term "Nature's God" used by deists of the time).

Yep.

Why not change "under God" to "under the Creator?" It sounds faintly Star Trekkish but it was good enough for our progressive founders....and really, the Creator could be any one or any thing and therefore more American.
 

Forum List

Back
Top