Spoonman
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2010
- 18,163
- 7,661
- 330
that would make them obama's failed policies.
i'll refrain from commenting on hope and change.
oops, i goess i won't
bush's third term continues
so they whine that he's a commiesocialistmuslimkenyan for no reason?
and they'd call him a commiesocialstmuslimkenyan if he did do what he was elected to do. (which is end baby bush's policies?
i figure that means he should have told the right to stick it b/c it doesn't matter what he does. they'd hate him either way. *shrug*
which leads me back to the epic fail of the o/p.
*hugs*
If Obama had let the banks fail along with GM and Chrysler, we most likely would have 25% unemployment right now, the DOW would be sitting at 3500, and the Cons would be screaming how Obama should have known he had to bail the banks out. Then they would be telling us that he let them fail on purpose just so he could invoke his socialist policies.
You cannot argue with Cons because they never want to take credit for their own screw ups. It's like they tell us the biggest cause of these massive deficits is due to the fact that we didn't lower taxes enough. Everyone knows that the Bush tax cuts are the main cause of all the lost revenue, but the Cons tell us that we need to cut taxes even more to increase revenue.
let's see, he didn't help ford out and they are doing quite nicely - on their own. he didn't help a number of banks out and they are doing quitenicely - on their own