One particular inconvenient fact about the Hunter Biden laptop

Bank records are records of transactions. Nothing more. It’s up to Comer to show what if anything is criminal about those transactions. Simply suggesting so means nothing.
He will when he's allowed to see them, dumbass. Why is Biden fighting so hard to prevent Comer from doing that?
 
That statement presents facts not in evidence.

once again: It also means that facts discovered by the grand jury, constitute evidence. So there is ample evidence of Trumps guilty, as presented to a court of law, and included in the indictment.

The Grand Jury doesn't discover any facts. It reviews the evidence the prosecutor presents to them - carefully selected evidence designed to get the judgement he wants.
 
Weiss was chosen by a couple of Democrats, the two Democrat Senators from Delaware. All he's done with the Hunter Biden case is cover it up. He allowed a couple of charges to expire dud to statute of limitations. This is the man AG Garland chose to be the special counsel. He's the last man who should have been selected.
After the Republicans asked him to be made SC. :rolleyes:

Republicans who demanded special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden aren’t satisfied​

 
In order for a GJ to hand down an indictment they have to find that there is enough evidence showing criminal behavior to bring a case to trial.

You’re welcome
The grand jury hears witnesses presented by the prosecutor. They get to question "cross examine" those witnesses to determine if their testimony is trustworthy.
This is no different than at trial, except the jurys do not get to participate, and instead defense counsel does the "cross examination" instead of the jury.
 
In order for a GJ to hand down an indictment they have to find that there is enough evidence showing criminal behavior to bring a case to trial.

You’re welcome
They don't "discover" the evidence. That prosecutor shows them whatever he wants to show them. No exculpatory evidence is shown to them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top