harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,017
- 2,300
''rights of the little girl''--propaganda BSyes, segregation has nothing to do with thisWrong about no harm done. If she didn't comply and he just walked away her respect for the rules and law would decrease. It's the main reason I also support pot legalization and gambling legalization. (and maybe controlled prostitution legalization),.
When we have laws people know they can ignore it's a direct attack on the rule of law, and people's respect for law.
Sorry, no. Do you think her respect for the law was served by being dragged off traumatized, humiliated, wrist sprained? I guarantee you she is simply MORE obstinate and distrustful now as is a lot of people reading her story. HARM DONE. His walking away was an act of faith, of trust. It is all about psychology. If she wasn't going to take her foot down voluntarily then, her feelings about the law would have simply remained the same. Maybe later as he passed by again, he might have thanked her for putting the foot down, or simply stopped again with a friendly reminder that she shouldn't put her feet up there. Just a gentle nudging in the right direction. A few seconds of friendship sure beats HOURS of time spent at the scene arresting her, paperwork, and time in court. Now he's off the street where he could have been doing some good. He would have shown her FAR MORE by having the power to FORCE her to comply yet was big enough not to. It might have changed her attitude a lot about cops, about men. It's a matter of psychology, of getting what you want with as little resistance as possible. Baby steps. They all begin with the police who are our First Representative of the law to the people. Save the rough stuff for those who really deserve it.
She was breaking the rules, she paid for it. Follow the rules or get the rules changed.
If she's smart she will learn the proper life lesson from this. If she's not she probably was a miserable little shit to begin with.
And then of course you have people like you cheering on her disrespect for the rules and their enforcement, which will probably encourage her to be more of an ass.
I don't cheer anyone's disrespect. But it was once a rule for blacks to sit in the back of the bus. It was once a rule that they had to eat and go to the bathroom in separate places. The question isn't whether it was a rule or law, but whether it was a just law. Was it reasonable to make that big a deal out of how she sat? It is one thing to teach respect of the law, quite another to teach FEAR of it. Better follow every law without objection------ OR ELSE! We gonna come BUST yer head open!
That's not the world I want my kids to grow up in. When federal laws were first codified in 1927, they fit into a single volume. By the 1980s, there were 50 volumes of more than 23,000 pages. How many are there today? And that does not even count state and local laws. The problem wasn't a little girl who just could not see why a cop was so adamant about how she chose to sit to be comfortable, it is the blind willingness of many to accept just about ANY imposition on their freedoms to CONFORM, the intrusion of government into almost every aspect of your life. The funny thing is that many of the people saying the girl deserved it for not simply blindly jumping unquestionably to the officer's demands are the exact same people who decry Trump for passing laws and regulations, then encouraging others to ignore and disobey them.
a just law?? --so now the cops have to worry if the laws are just?? !!?? what??
this is very simple....you are making it out to be complicated
the rules are--no feet on seats
the cop repeatedly asked her to get them off--he was telling her nicely--he wasn't being a jerk/tough guy!!
the cop was right to tell her to get her feet off
she refused
again---when the cops tell you to drop the weapon/get your feet off the seat--I guess you want the cops to just go back to their cars/station and let everyone do what they want--because that's what you are saying
rules are --no feet on seats---...what should the cop have done??
It's funny to watch someone protest as much as you do over the rights of a little girl to be treated humanely in a situation over a "law" so stupid and minor, it borders on telling you what hand to hold your fork with. I bet they don't even do that for kids in school buses! If that was your wife or daughter calling you from the hospital saying to come pick her up because a cop broke her wrist for sitting wrong, you would be all over that telephone in 5 minutes looking to sue the cop! I didn't see ONE PERSON in that video defending the cop's actions or chastising the girl! They BEGGED the cop to be reasonable but he would not stop. I'll say it again. IT'S A STUPID LAW. The fault here is with the LA imbecile who wrote it.
again what should the cop have done?? let her break the rules?? then he would have to let EVERYONE--including adults--break the rule
by your reasoning, everyone should be able to argue with the cop about if the laws are stupid or not
I don't think it's a stupid rule