Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
1. your definition is correct but that ain't what I did. Apparently it's what you WISH I did. That ain't happening. I don't work for you, chump.
2. I have no idea what point you're either making or running away from. If you can't articulate it, maybe there ain't any.
3. Wrong. I see no such thing. I see her left hand rise up laterally after she's put in a choke hold but she's in no position to strike him even if she had the size to.
4. You don't even refer to anything here so go fuck yourself, loser.
1. You do it constantly when you repeatedly point out that the cop was fired as though that supports or even proves your case.
Liberals. All the self awareness of turnips.
2. YOu keep whining about the irrelevant size difference. NOw you claim it is relevant because it relates to the "Degree of assault". Except there is no injury. So, stop filling the pages with useless filler in an attempt to hide how little you have to support your position.
3. Laterally means side to side. How does a hand "rise up laterally"? But regardless she hit the cop.
4. Fine. Liar. It is I who will be calling you on your dishonest bullshit. SO, you might as well drop it.
I don't know what part of this evades you, but claiming I said something I didn't ...................... still doesn't make me have said it. Doesn't work that way Junior.
2 - you still can't seem to articulate what the fuck your point is. That's a pretty good indication that you don't have one.
3 She flailed. Laterally. For you to suggest that's a "hit" on this guy -- and here's where size matters -- demonstrates your degree of dishonest hackitude.
4. No point ventured = no point gained.
You lose.
1. What point do you think you are making when you keep citing the fact the cop was fired? Dumbass.
2. It's your point to justify your constant whinging about the size difference. And I demolished it. That you are to dim or dishonest to admit it is not my problem.
3. Not a factor in Law Enforcement Procedure that I have ever heard. She hit him, boom justification.
1. What point do you think you are making when you keep citing the fact the cop was fired? Dumbass.
The fact that he fucked up and was fired.
The better question is what in the fuck is your point?
Thank you. I was trying to get POGO to admit that.
He keeps insisting that he is NOT doing that, ie NOT doing the Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Authority.
That was my point.
He isn't. It's not a fallacy in any way. It's a fact. To not accept that as a fact and instead create your own narrative is the fallacy.
fal·la·cy
ˈfaləsē/
noun
- a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument.