Over-Population Mythology

[ralfy]

It is my mission to explode Liberal mythology.....
But try as I may, I simply cannot keep up with the nonsense that Liberals are willing to believe.

Be fair, Liberals.....isn't it time for you to use even that limited intelligence and worldly experience to throw up your hands and shout 'Basta! Enough!...even I cannot accept....[fill in fable of your choice.]'



1. There are literally dozens of 'em....but the godfather of hand-wringing environmentalism, Thomas 'Chicken-Little' Malthus is simply ground-floor claptrap.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his views continue in the hearts and minds of Progressives, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. Fact: Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.

2. "In spite of the serious errors in Malthus, we have witnessed in the last decade an outburst of "neo-Malthusianism," a new widespread fear, sometimes verging on hysteria, about a world "population explosion." Paul Erlich, professor of biology at Stanford University, in a book entitled The Population Bomb, warns us that we are all doomed if we do not control population growth."
Hazlitt, "The Conquest of Poverty," p.27.



Did I mention that this is about Liberal, Progressive, Democrat myths?


Let's remind all that Malthusians occupy the highest seats in Democrat government: Paul Ehrlich's co-author was chosen by Barack Obama as his 'science czar.'


3. "John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.”
Holdren added that the sterilant must meet stiff requirements in that it must only affect humans and not livestock.

“It must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock,” wrote Holdren with co-authors Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much, amidst the myriad of other totalitarian Dr. Strangelove style ideas that are put forward in the book as a way to carry out an aggressive agenda of population reduction.
» Obama Science Czar’s Plan To Sterilize Population Through Water Supply Already Happening Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!





Now....if Malthus has been proven wrong, what does it say about Ehrlich and Holdren who are still pushing solutions to imaginary problems?


And, more to the point, what does it say about our petit mal President, who appointed Holdren......

...and about brain-dead voters who elected them???

The use of technology doesn't show over-population as a myth but the opposite. Otherwise, there would be no need to use technology.

Over-population is a scientific fact for painfully obvious reasons.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The crux of the matter is that, simply put, the world is not overpopulated.


The math may be over the heads of Liberals....but here it explodes another Liberal myth:

10. Using the square milage for Texas: 1 square mile = 5280 x 5280 square feet = 27,878,400 square feet. So 268,581 square miles = 7,487,608,550,400.

For simplicity say 7.5 x 10^12. That divided by 7 x 10^9 is indeed over 1000 square feet per person. So if we made one giant one-story compound over Texas, land, water, and all, we would each get a 1,000 square foot unit.


In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote:
“Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.” According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.


....if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.
The entire world population can fit into the state of Texas - snopes.com




For a family of four, that means a residence of some 4500 square feet....which is more than most living in the socialist haven known as the EU.


Hand-wringers unite!

Oh...wait....they already did....in the Democrat Party.

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

 

[Marxist]

The crux of the matter is that, simply put, the world is not overpopulated.


The math may be over the heads of Liberals....but here it explodes another Liberal myth:

10. Using the square milage for Texas: 1 square mile = 5280 x 5280 square feet = 27,878,400 square feet. So 268,581 square miles = 7,487,608,550,400.

For simplicity say 7.5 x 10^12. That divided by 7 x 10^9 is indeed over 1000 square feet per person. So if we made one giant one-story compound over Texas, land, water, and all, we would each get a 1,000 square foot unit.


In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote:
“Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.” According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.


....if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.
The entire world population can fit into the state of Texas - snopes.com




For a family of four, that means a residence of some 4500 square feet....which is more than most living in the socialist haven known as the EU.


Hand-wringers unite!

Oh...wait....they already did....in the Democrat Party.

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is my mission to explode Liberal mythology.....
But try as I may, I simply cannot keep up with the nonsense that Liberals are willing to believe.

Be fair, Liberals.....isn't it time for you to use even that limited intelligence and worldly experience to throw up your hands and shout 'Basta! Enough!...even I cannot accept....[fill in fable of your choice.]'



1. There are literally dozens of 'em....but the godfather of hand-wringing environmentalism, Thomas 'Chicken-Little' Malthus is simply ground-floor claptrap.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his views continue in the hearts and minds of Progressives, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. Fact: Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.

2. "In spite of the serious errors in Malthus, we have witnessed in the last decade an outburst of "neo-Malthusianism," a new widespread fear, sometimes verging on hysteria, about a world "population explosion." Paul Erlich, professor of biology at Stanford University, in a book entitled The Population Bomb, warns us that we are all doomed if we do not control population growth."
Hazlitt, "The Conquest of Poverty," p.27.



Did I mention that this is about Liberal, Progressive, Democrat myths?


Let's remind all that Malthusians occupy the highest seats in Democrat government: Paul Ehrlich's co-author was chosen by Barack Obama as his 'science czar.'


3. "John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.”
Holdren added that the sterilant must meet stiff requirements in that it must only affect humans and not livestock.

“It must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock,” wrote Holdren with co-authors Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much, amidst the myriad of other totalitarian Dr. Strangelove style ideas that are put forward in the book as a way to carry out an aggressive agenda of population reduction.
» Obama Science Czar’s Plan To Sterilize Population Through Water Supply Already Happening Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!





Now....if Malthus has been proven wrong, what does it say about Ehrlich and Holdren who are still pushing solutions to imaginary problems?


And, more to the point, what does it say about our petit mal President, who appointed Holdren......

...and about brain-dead voters who elected them???

The use of technology doesn't show over-population as a myth but the opposite. Otherwise, there would be no need to use technology.

Over-population is a scientific fact for painfully obvious reasons.

"Over-population is a scientific fact..."
Au contraire....

Your post has revealed how truly little intelligence you have at your command.
That is really the 'painfully obvious' fact.

I suggest you find someone with a higher education...any third grader will do....to read the thread and explain it to you.

 

[Wuwei]

Well....luckily for you, you don't have to guess......I'm here to provide the facts.
Guessing results in acceptance of the fabricated crises that keep Liberals/Progressives/Democrats in office.

You don't need to get in a snit and attempt to insult me. The point wasn't so much as guessing, but to explore how equilibrium would be reached.
So I understand your take is that in the Muslim world population equilibrium is largely voluntary birthrate decline. How about other countries? I know some European countries have declining birthrates. It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too. Do you have any figures on that? Starvation, war, etc?

If birthrate decline is the prevailing mode for other countries, the graying of the population would become a problem. I still don't think equilibrium of population would result in a very pleasant quality of life.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The crux of the matter is that, simply put, the world is not overpopulated.


The math may be over the heads of Liberals....but here it explodes another Liberal myth:

10. Using the square milage for Texas: 1 square mile = 5280 x 5280 square feet = 27,878,400 square feet. So 268,581 square miles = 7,487,608,550,400.

For simplicity say 7.5 x 10^12. That divided by 7 x 10^9 is indeed over 1000 square feet per person. So if we made one giant one-story compound over Texas, land, water, and all, we would each get a 1,000 square foot unit.


In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote:
“Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.” According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.


....if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.
The entire world population can fit into the state of Texas - snopes.com




For a family of four, that means a residence of some 4500 square feet....which is more than most living in the socialist haven known as the EU.


Hand-wringers unite!

Oh...wait....they already did....in the Democrat Party.

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

 

[Marxist]

It is my mission to explode Liberal mythology.....
But try as I may, I simply cannot keep up with the nonsense that Liberals are willing to believe.

Be fair, Liberals.....isn't it time for you to use even that limited intelligence and worldly experience to throw up your hands and shout 'Basta! Enough!...even I cannot accept....[fill in fable of your choice.]'



1. There are literally dozens of 'em....but the godfather of hand-wringing environmentalism, Thomas 'Chicken-Little' Malthus is simply ground-floor claptrap.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his views continue in the hearts and minds of Progressives, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. Fact: Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.

2. "In spite of the serious errors in Malthus, we have witnessed in the last decade an outburst of "neo-Malthusianism," a new widespread fear, sometimes verging on hysteria, about a world "population explosion." Paul Erlich, professor of biology at Stanford University, in a book entitled The Population Bomb, warns us that we are all doomed if we do not control population growth."
Hazlitt, "The Conquest of Poverty," p.27.



Did I mention that this is about Liberal, Progressive, Democrat myths?


Let's remind all that Malthusians occupy the highest seats in Democrat government: Paul Ehrlich's co-author was chosen by Barack Obama as his 'science czar.'


3. "John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.”
Holdren added that the sterilant must meet stiff requirements in that it must only affect humans and not livestock.

“It must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock,” wrote Holdren with co-authors Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much, amidst the myriad of other totalitarian Dr. Strangelove style ideas that are put forward in the book as a way to carry out an aggressive agenda of population reduction.
» Obama Science Czar’s Plan To Sterilize Population Through Water Supply Already Happening Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!





Now....if Malthus has been proven wrong, what does it say about Ehrlich and Holdren who are still pushing solutions to imaginary problems?


And, more to the point, what does it say about our petit mal President, who appointed Holdren......

...and about brain-dead voters who elected them???

The use of technology doesn't show over-population as a myth but the opposite. Otherwise, there would be no need to use technology.

Over-population is a scientific fact for painfully obvious reasons.

"Over-population is a scientific fact..."
Au contraire....

Your post has revealed how truly little intelligence you have at your command.
That is really the 'painfully obvious' fact.

I suggest you find someone with a higher education...any third grader will do....to read the thread and explain it to you.

"Your post has revealed how truly little intelligence you have at your command."
You may want to look at yourself.

 

[Marxist]

The crux of the matter is that, simply put, the world is not overpopulated.


The math may be over the heads of Liberals....but here it explodes another Liberal myth:

10. Using the square milage for Texas: 1 square mile = 5280 x 5280 square feet = 27,878,400 square feet. So 268,581 square miles = 7,487,608,550,400.

For simplicity say 7.5 x 10^12. That divided by 7 x 10^9 is indeed over 1000 square feet per person. So if we made one giant one-story compound over Texas, land, water, and all, we would each get a 1,000 square foot unit.


In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote:
“Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.” According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.


....if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.
The entire world population can fit into the state of Texas - snopes.com




For a family of four, that means a residence of some 4500 square feet....which is more than most living in the socialist haven known as the EU.


Hand-wringers unite!

Oh...wait....they already did....in the Democrat Party.

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well....luckily for you, you don't have to guess......I'm here to provide the facts.
Guessing results in acceptance of the fabricated crises that keep Liberals/Progressives/Democrats in office.

You don't need to get in a snit and attempt to insult me. The point wasn't so much as guessing, but to explore how equilibrium would be reached.
So I understand your take is that in the Muslim world population equilibrium is largely voluntary birthrate decline. How about other countries? I know some European countries have declining birthrates. It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too. Do you have any figures on that? Starvation, war, etc?

If birthrate decline is the prevailing mode for other countries, the graying of the population would become a problem. I still don't think equilibrium of population would result in a very pleasant quality of life.

1. I try to be a nice person, but sometimes my mouth doesn't cooperate.
It seems to occur whenever anyone doubts what I post.

2. "How about other countries? "
Never leaving any loose ends, I will cover the world...over the next hour or so.
I hope you have the time and/or interest to read....you will be convinced.

3. "It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too."
And I will cover the reasons behind the trends, too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is my mission to explode Liberal mythology.....
But try as I may, I simply cannot keep up with the nonsense that Liberals are willing to believe.

Be fair, Liberals.....isn't it time for you to use even that limited intelligence and worldly experience to throw up your hands and shout 'Basta! Enough!...even I cannot accept....[fill in fable of your choice.]'



1. There are literally dozens of 'em....but the godfather of hand-wringing environmentalism, Thomas 'Chicken-Little' Malthus is simply ground-floor claptrap.

a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?

b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet his views continue in the hearts and minds of Progressives, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.

c. Fact: Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.

2. "In spite of the serious errors in Malthus, we have witnessed in the last decade an outburst of "neo-Malthusianism," a new widespread fear, sometimes verging on hysteria, about a world "population explosion." Paul Erlich, professor of biology at Stanford University, in a book entitled The Population Bomb, warns us that we are all doomed if we do not control population growth."
Hazlitt, "The Conquest of Poverty," p.27.



Did I mention that this is about Liberal, Progressive, Democrat myths?


Let's remind all that Malthusians occupy the highest seats in Democrat government: Paul Ehrlich's co-author was chosen by Barack Obama as his 'science czar.'


3. "John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.”
Holdren added that the sterilant must meet stiff requirements in that it must only affect humans and not livestock.

“It must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock,” wrote Holdren with co-authors Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much, amidst the myriad of other totalitarian Dr. Strangelove style ideas that are put forward in the book as a way to carry out an aggressive agenda of population reduction.
» Obama Science Czar’s Plan To Sterilize Population Through Water Supply Already Happening Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!





Now....if Malthus has been proven wrong, what does it say about Ehrlich and Holdren who are still pushing solutions to imaginary problems?


And, more to the point, what does it say about our petit mal President, who appointed Holdren......

...and about brain-dead voters who elected them???

The use of technology doesn't show over-population as a myth but the opposite. Otherwise, there would be no need to use technology.

Over-population is a scientific fact for painfully obvious reasons.

"Over-population is a scientific fact..."
Au contraire....

Your post has revealed how truly little intelligence you have at your command.
That is really the 'painfully obvious' fact.

I suggest you find someone with a higher education...any third grader will do....to read the thread and explain it to you.

"Your post has revealed how truly little intelligence you have at your command."
You may want to look at yourself.

I do so...also....perhaps too often.

Did you notice that ‘awesome’ ends with ‘me,’ and ‘ugly’ begins with ‘u.’

 

[PoliticalChic]

The crux of the matter is that, simply put, the world is not overpopulated.


The math may be over the heads of Liberals....but here it explodes another Liberal myth:

10. Using the square milage for Texas: 1 square mile = 5280 x 5280 square feet = 27,878,400 square feet. So 268,581 square miles = 7,487,608,550,400.

For simplicity say 7.5 x 10^12. That divided by 7 x 10^9 is indeed over 1000 square feet per person. So if we made one giant one-story compound over Texas, land, water, and all, we would each get a 1,000 square foot unit.


In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote:
“Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.” According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.


....if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.
The entire world population can fit into the state of Texas - snopes.com




For a family of four, that means a residence of some 4500 square feet....which is more than most living in the socialist haven known as the EU.


Hand-wringers unite!

Oh...wait....they already did....in the Democrat Party.

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

 

[Marxist]

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

DO YOU AGREE THAT HUNGER KILLS MILLIONS EVERY YEAR? THIS DETERMINES THE FUTURE OF YOUR BULLSHIT.

 

[Marxist]

We know it's not.

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

Then why the hell are on a political site?

 

[PoliticalChic]

13. European apathy is the flip side of Islamic extremism, both losing their connection with the past, and their confidence in the future, between European resignation with cultural extinction and the Islamist boast “You love life, we love death!’
Factors associated with population decline include urbanization, education and literacy, modernization.

1. 1. Children had an economic value in a traditional, agricultural society. Pension systems turned children into a cost rather providers for the elderly.
   2. Female literacy is a powerful predictor of population decline. Literate and affluent women have one or two children, not six or eight. The determination between one, or two, is often religious faith: the industrial world’s lowest fertility rates are found among the Eastern European nations where atheism was the official ideology for generations. The highest rates are associated with nations such as the United States and Israel, with relatively high religious populations. Where faith goes, fertility vanishes. This is not to say that all faiths are equal in this regard: the fastest decline is taking place in Muslim countries. See
      "How Civilizations Die," by David Goldman

14. Most of Israel's population increase comes from so-called "secular" Israelis, who have 2.6 children on average, more than any other people in the industrial world. The ultra-Orthodox have seven or eight, bringing total fertility to three children.

Europeans, Turks and Iranians, by contrast, have very few children because they are grumpy, alienated and pessimistic. It's not so much the projection of the demographic future cranked out by the United Nations computers that counts, but rather the implicit vision of the future in the minds of today's prospective parents.
Yaacov Lozowick s Ruminations Demographics and the Long-Term Israeli Victory

 

[Wuwei]

1. I try to be a nice person, but sometimes my mouth doesn't cooperate.
It seems to occur whenever anyone doubts what I post.

2. "How about other countries? "
Never leaving any loose ends, I will cover the world...over the next hour or so.
I hope you have the time and/or interest to read....you will be convinced.

3. "It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too."
And I will cover the reasons behind the trends, too.

Thank you. I will look forward to seeing the statistics.

Another question is where is the population distribution heading, as I mentioned in the graying of population. Japan has telling statistics: In Japan, for the first time, sales of adult diapers exceeded the sale of baby diapers. Yes, amusing, but it is also a harbinger.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It was satisfying to see that I've embarrassed you into removing the picture of that savage from your avi.
Chalk one up for the good guys (gals).

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

Then why the hell are on a political site?

My function is education of dolts like you.....often, that means exploding Liberal myths....

....such as the fable that the world is overpopulated and this is some sort of crisis that only Leftist elites can conquer.


As the thread proves....a totally absurd myth.


As are you.

 

[Marxist]

What the hell, I haven't had Lenin as my profile picture for several days now, and you're embarrassing yourself. Millions suffer of lack of food. Millions die to starvation every year, and you tried to fucking deny it.

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

Then why the hell are on a political site?

My function is education of dolts like you.....often, that means exploding Liberal myths....

....such as the fable that the world is overpopulated and this is some sort of crisis that only Leftist elites can conquer.


As the thread proves....a totally absurd myth.


As are you.

You never end up exposing anything, you're a butthurt woman who wants to blame everything wrong on "liberals" and you continually fail to address that millions starve to death every year, if you deny that, you're a fucking sick person. The world isn't overpopulated, as of now, we all agree on this, you want to run with what some nut says and stereotype all "liberals." Tell me, where would we be right now without liberalism? Your a top of the line nutjob who relies on quoting random books and fucking infowars/taking everything out of context/quote mining..

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. I try to be a nice person, but sometimes my mouth doesn't cooperate.
It seems to occur whenever anyone doubts what I post.

2. "How about other countries? "
Never leaving any loose ends, I will cover the world...over the next hour or so.
I hope you have the time and/or interest to read....you will be convinced.

3. "It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too."
And I will cover the reasons behind the trends, too.

Thank you. I will look forward to seeing the statistics.

Another question is where is the population distribution heading, as I mentioned in the graying of population. Japan has telling statistics: In Japan, for the first time, sales of adult diapers exceeded the sale of baby diapers. Yes, amusing, but it is also a harbinger.

I don't wish to change the trajectory of the thread....but the solution...one which I don't predict will occur....is the reversal of the 20th century flip from spirituality to materialism....Marxism.

It is the poison that will terminate mankind.

 

[Marxist]

1. I try to be a nice person, but sometimes my mouth doesn't cooperate.
It seems to occur whenever anyone doubts what I post.

2. "How about other countries? "
Never leaving any loose ends, I will cover the world...over the next hour or so.
I hope you have the time and/or interest to read....you will be convinced.

3. "It seems that the other factors I mention should be addressed too."
And I will cover the reasons behind the trends, too.

Thank you. I will look forward to seeing the statistics.

Another question is where is the population distribution heading, as I mentioned in the graying of population. Japan has telling statistics: In Japan, for the first time, sales of adult diapers exceeded the sale of baby diapers. Yes, amusing, but it is also a harbinger.

I don't wish to change the trajectory of the thread....but the solution...one which I don't predict will occur....is the reversal of the 20th century flip from spirituality to materialism....Marxism.

It is the poison that will terminate mankind.

Yeah, that certainly worked well...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Psittacine species, parrots, have a brain to body ration equal to that of chimpanzees. As such, parrots are the smartest of all birds with the cognitive capacity of a five-year-old child.

Don’t you wish that that could be said of you?

Isn't it funny how you can't have an honest debate, and when you're wrong, completely resort to pointless insults?
Hunger Statistics WFP United Nations World Food Programme - Fighting Hunger Worldwide

I have no reason to debate....I simply explain why I'm right.

And....have no trouble accurately describing you.

Then why the hell are on a political site?

My function is education of dolts like you.....often, that means exploding Liberal myths....

....such as the fable that the world is overpopulated and this is some sort of crisis that only Leftist elites can conquer.


As the thread proves....a totally absurd myth.


As are you.

You never end up exposing anything, you're a butthurt woman who wants to blame everything wrong on "liberals" and you continually fail to address that millions starve to death every year, if you deny that, you're a fucking sick person. The world isn't overpopulated, as of now, we all agree on this, you want to run with what some nut says and stereotype all "liberals." Tell me, where would we be right now without liberalism? Your a top of the line nutjob who relies on quoting random books and fucking infowars/taking everything out of context/quote mining..

The wheel's spinning, but the hamster's dead.

There's no award for stupid....so stop competing