rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 22,090
- 4,713
- 290
That still says nothing.OK, that says nothing.Like what?Lucky thirteen.
You don't have an entitlement to illegal activity.
From quick review of cases, which are available online, I gather she was accused of 10 crimes; Of which membership in PFLP, promotion of organizations' activity and incitement to violence are only 3.
In another case against a doctor who went to Syria and participated in Al-Nusra training, while taking part in their field activity, Khaleda's case was brought in the context of 15 months in arrest/jail, as a comparison case of a worse crime.
That's more substance than any of Your propaganda videos.
In fact, her lawyer didn't object that her charges had enough rational for arrest on grounds of danger to public.
Got any links?
That says that her lawyer objected only on the ground of the interval between the documented crimes and arrest itself. He didn't object the crimes weren't worthy of arrest on grounds of public safety, but that she wasn't dangerous enough because they decided to arrest her only 6 years after the first documented crime.
In other words until another PFLP suicide bomber attacker or another civilian plane hijacked, Khaleda Jarar, according to her lawyer's logic - had impunity from arrest because her investigation went longer than she expected.
![dig :dig: :dig:](/styles/smilies/dig.gif)
Last edited: