Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
We are in complete agreement on this."...They should both be denounced - whether it's the Palestinians or the IDF. Instead of excusing it..."
The main concerns for many folk (myself included) are likely to be..
1. getting a good handle (counts, details) on the number of Human Shield incidents being alleged
2. discounting rocks thrown by Side B against Side A, when Side B engages in even more of it, by several orders of magnitude
3. ensuring that censure is applied to both sides, in proportion to their culpability or the number of people that they jeapordize
When we have credible data on actual Human Shield incidents by the IDF (not mixing them in with Informant Use incidents)...
And when we have separated Rock-Shields from Bullet-Shields (injury-baiting versus death-baiting, a matter of the degree of seriousness) then I believe it will be safe to throw rocks at the IDF for any incidents that survive that vetting process.
Hell, I'll stand alongside you and JOIN-IN on the rock throwing against the IDF, under circumstances where they're using Human Shields (women, children and teens, especially) to ward-off Bullets.
None of this is 'defending' the IDF in such a context.
None of this is even attempting to muddy the waters or to delay the process.
This is simply trying to filter-out the pro-Palestinian Bull$hit and other biases (from the Palestinians, and Palestinian-sympathetic NGO's) before examining what's left, after a more objective screening is undertaken.
Last edited: