eagleseven
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
It's not a conspiracy.Or, a lot more simple explanation: It was written about the fulfillment of prophesy, and it fulfills prophesy because it was that fulfillment. No conspiracies.
Conspiracies aren't that successful, nor do they last so long.
I have no doubts that the author of Matthew sincerely believed in Jesus Christ. He believed in Jesus Christ so much, that he felt embellishing Jesus's story, in order to win more converts, was justified. The authors of Gospels were human, after all.
Read the "historical" account of the 14th Dalai Llama. Even though the story is only 60 years old, millions believe that the young Dalai Llama was performing miracles in the late 1940s, before China invaded.
Fact of the matter is, no dissenters came forward. People who were alive during the life of Christ, who were not converts. They saw the miracles, and did not contest the gospels when they first started circulating.
Likewise, nobody contested that Jesus performed miracles, and nobody claimed what the disciples preached was untrue. Doesn't that strike you as odd, if as you say it was all a conspiracy?
And then there's the little fact that the disciples sans one died horrible deaths. Few people who are perpetuating lies are willing to go to that extreme. The current Dahli Lama was perfectly happy to leave his country when things got hot. In another 60 years, nobody will remember the miracle thing.
As I stated above, it is not a conspiracy. And the Gospels were contested, heavily, This is why we only have 4 Gospels, while dozens were written.
And how do you explain Islam? Is it one large Conspiracy? Or was Mohammed sent here by God to correct the errors of Christianity?
If you claim all of Islam is a conspiracy, then all of Christianity can just as easily be a conspiracy.