Patriot Brennan strikes back!

[OldLady]

In a blistering editorial John Brennan strikes back against the compromised crook sitting in what should now be called the Offal Office.

From the Op-Ed:

Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash.

The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of “Trump Incorporated” attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets. A jury is about to deliberate bank and tax fraud charges against one of those people, Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman. And the campaign’s former deputy chairman, Rick Gates, has pleaded guilty to financial fraud and lying to investigators

Mr. Trump clearly has become more desperate to protect himself and those close to him, which is why he made the politically motivated decision to revoke my security clearance in an attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to challenge him. Now more than ever, it is critically important that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his team of investigators be allowed to complete their work without interference — from Mr. Trump or anyone else — so that all Americans can get the answers they so rightly deserve.

Opinion | John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash

He is right. Brennan is our Paul Revere. Don't let the colluder shut you up. Your country needs you.

awwwww, did he lose his security clearance, now he can't lie to people and say he saw classified material that indicts Trump......this faggot deserved to lose his clearance and fuck his partisan politics

No, fuck YOUR partisan politics. That is all you got with this argument.
Little hands is going to pay for this one.

no he won't, because Breenan is a piece of shit. most CIA people don't go on tv and trash the current President......

but what should I expect from people that think their side has a right to do anything to our side based on some bullshit that we are fascists so therefore we have no rights.

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

 

[mudwhistle]

In a blistering editorial John Brennan strikes back against the compromised crook sitting in what should now be called the Offal Office.

From the Op-Ed:

Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash.

The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of “Trump Incorporated” attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets. A jury is about to deliberate bank and tax fraud charges against one of those people, Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman. And the campaign’s former deputy chairman, Rick Gates, has pleaded guilty to financial fraud and lying to investigators

Mr. Trump clearly has become more desperate to protect himself and those close to him, which is why he made the politically motivated decision to revoke my security clearance in an attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to challenge him. Now more than ever, it is critically important that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his team of investigators be allowed to complete their work without interference — from Mr. Trump or anyone else — so that all Americans can get the answers they so rightly deserve.

Opinion | John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash

He is right. Brennan is our Paul Revere. Don't let the colluder shut you up. Your country needs you.

You must work for the Onion or the Daily kos, because Mr Brennan actually colluded with Russia to bring down President Trump.

April 24, 2018
John Brennan's Secret Trip to Moscow
By Daniel John Sobieski
The Russians say he did, and while some might say, well, these are the same Russians who helped put together the Steele dossier filled with "salacious and unverified" material, and may once again be playing with us, there is evidence that Brennan, the man who voted for communist Gus Hall for president, did make the trip in March 2016 for purposes unknown:

"It's no secret that Brennan was here," claimed Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Oleg Syromolotov. "But he didn't visit the Foreign Ministry. I know for sure that he met with the Federal Security Service (the successor agency to the Soviet KGB), and someone else."

No further remarks clarify what Brennan was allegedly doing in Moscow or what he discussed with the FSB. Syromolotov insists it had nothing to do with Russia's withdrawal from Syria.

Sputnik News, a Kremlin-controlled propaganda outlet, quotes CIA Director of Public Affairs Dean Boyd as affirming that Brennan did, in fact, discuss Syria during the visit. "Director Brennan," he allegedly said, "reiterated the US government's consistent support for a genuine political transition in Syria, and the need for [President Bashar] Assad's departure in order to facilitate a transition that reflects the will of the Syrian people."

Now, there are plenty of legitimate reasons for a CIA director to make a trip to Moscow, but when a Russian deputy foreign minister says he didn't visit the Foreign Ministry itself but did visit the KGB's successor, the Federal Security Service (FSB), it raises some eyebrows.

Consider that John Brennan is a Trump-hating perjurer who lied to Congress about secret surveillance. He is the crown prince of a Deep State fiefdom that has its own agenda. The end justifies the means in their world, and Brennan may have been up to his eyeballs in developing that "insurance policy" against a Trump victory.

Certainly, he ruthlessly defended his CIA turf. The mind hearkens back to the day when an op-ed in the Washington Post, that right-wing rag, called for Brennan to be fired for conducting illegal surveillance of the Senate Intelligence Committee and then lying about it:

Brennan was asked by NBC's Andrea Mitchell whether the CIA had illegally accessed Senate Intelligence Committee staff computers "to thwart an investigation by the committee into" the agency's past interrogation techniques. The accusation had been made earlier that day by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who said the CIA had "violated the separation-of-powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution." Brennan answered:

As far as the allegations of, you know, CIA hacking into, you know, Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth. I mean, we wouldn't do that. I mean, that's – that's just beyond the – you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we would do. ...

And, you know, when the facts come out on this, I think a lot of people who are claiming that there has been this tremendous sort of spying and monitoring and hacking will be proved wrong.

(You can see the video of Brennan's answer here.)

Now we know that the truth was far different. The Post's Greg Miller reports:

CIA Director John O. Brennan has apologized to leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee after an agency investigation determined that its employees improperly searched computers used by committee staff to review classified files on interrogations of prisoners. ...

A statement released by the CIA on Tuesday acknowledged that agency employees had searched areas of that computer network that were supposed to be accessible only to committee investigators. Agency employees were attempting to discover how congressional aides had obtained a secret CIA internal report on the interrogation program.

Brennan once proudly admitted that he voted for Communist Party leader Gus Hall and openly supports liars and perjurers like Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, and James Comey. The possibility that he went to Moscow to personally obtain a copy of the dossier and similar material is real. As I wrote here recently, Brennan may have colluded with foreign spies to help Hillary Clinton.

​

Now what have I told you kids about posting junk frof conspiracy theory blog sites?

... and I bet it's times like this that you wished you could read.

...and I bet it's times like this that you wished you could think.

Or alternatively and correctly "... And I bet it's at timti like this you wish you could think".

....or spell.

 

[buckeye45_73]

nothing. i never said he was. i think we're so divided as a country we use terms we'd not normally use to get a point across that really isn't a point.

brennan hates trump. he's far from alone. as long as that did not interfere with him doing his job, leave it alone. if it did, i can see the revoke. did trump do this because brennan hates him? maybe. lord knows obama did it to journalists he hated and the left looked away. those bad journalists deserved it. i mean, breaking fast and furious - how dare you report what our president and his staff is doing!

did you cry out then? i wasn't here so i don't know and won't speak for you. but it remains a valid question.

we can't get mad at people ONLY cause we hate them and let people we like do the same or similar things. it sets a bad tone and people tend to as human nature dictates, one up the situation. a "hold my beer" if you will both sides are engaged in and we root our side on to the finish cause the other side is... well the other side.

i think our last 2 presidents are pretty petty overall. one just spoke well when his teleprompter works and the other has a teleprompter borrowed from an elementary school play. neither is "good" in my mind and both are dividing this country up as we fight for one idiot over another as if that's really more than a pyrrhic victory.

But as usual, you are dragging Obama into this when it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama. Nothing. Obama never revoked a security clearance because he didn't like the guy's commentary; no President ever has before.

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

The point is the meeting is a nothing burger. That is the only thing you guys have and it's nothing.
The Clintons spyed on an opponent campaign with a fake document.....lets investigate that......we actually have something to investigate.

 

[iceberg]

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

Wow, you were there?

No, only those conspiring to collude were there.

so you have no idea what was happening and choose to believe what you want out of the convenience that you want to believe it.

how did that lawyer get in the country again?

 

[OldLady]

I don't care what a hissy fit you throw (anyone kind of expects it from you), when you get back to Trump, fine.

heh - hissy fit. who's the one that can't answer base questions and then screams at me then ignores me for awhile only to come back later with the same stubborn crap that we had issues with before?

that would be - well get a mirror and guess.

and hey - i was right. giving you all those links about obama attacking the press was a total and complete waste of time. i've come to find you'll stay stupid shit (strip searches at the border) and then throw your own hissy fit when i ask where you heard that, please provide a link. no - you just proclaim i'm being an ass (and at times i am, yes) and i must be ignored.

yet again - i'm right about you. that's got to sit bad in your craw.

When you get back to Trump pulling Brennan's security clearance for no valid reason, I'll respond all you like. I'm not interested in talking about Obama.

like i said when this started and you asked for info; it would be a total and complete waste of time to give it to you.

i win again.

go back to ignoring me now. anything else you do my reply is just gonna make you throw a tantrum and ignore me.

again.

btw -

13 WAYS TO LOSE YOUR SECURITY CLEARANCE | Virginia Workplace Discrimination Lawyers | Maryland Wrongful Termination Law Firm

looks like there are many valid ways your clearance can be lost - of which working to overthrow the gov is on that list.

if brennan is NOT trying to get trump out of office, then what else is his purpose here? seems to be that is a valid reason in itself but i'm sure it's not for you.

Voicing a critical opinion of the President's action or statement is not "working to overthrow the government," though. You know that.

Have you ever been critical of Obama? Were you trying to "overthrow the government?"

wow. your abstinence from obama talk and referencing didn't last long, did it? how come YOU can bring him up to prove a point but *I* can't?

I was responding to a question.

 

[buckeye45_73]

awwwww, did he lose his security clearance, now he can't lie to people and say he saw classified material that indicts Trump......this faggot deserved to lose his clearance and fuck his partisan politics

No, fuck YOUR partisan politics. That is all you got with this argument.
Little hands is going to pay for this one.

no he won't, because Breenan is a piece of shit. most CIA people don't go on tv and trash the current President......

but what should I expect from people that think their side has a right to do anything to our side based on some bullshit that we are fascists so therefore we have no rights.

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

Well you are wrong. Calling the President a traitor is enough, and he's done much much more than that. He is not trying to work with or help this President, hence he does not need one.......buh bye to the clearance

 

[easyt65]

Honest Don:

Trump On Mueller Interview: "I Would Do It Under Oath"

Trump’s lawyers prepare to fight subpoena all the way to the Supreme Court

You seem to be confusing what Trump has said what he wants to do with what his lawyers are doing and get paid to do....

...but don't let a little thing like reality / truth get in your way.

 

[OldLady]

Patriot Brennan?.....
the Admitted commie and converted Muslim seditious bastard?.....

I don't think it's possible to be a communist and Muslim both. js

 

[iceberg]

heh - hissy fit. who's the one that can't answer base questions and then screams at me then ignores me for awhile only to come back later with the same stubborn crap that we had issues with before?

that would be - well get a mirror and guess.

and hey - i was right. giving you all those links about obama attacking the press was a total and complete waste of time. i've come to find you'll stay stupid shit (strip searches at the border) and then throw your own hissy fit when i ask where you heard that, please provide a link. no - you just proclaim i'm being an ass (and at times i am, yes) and i must be ignored.

yet again - i'm right about you. that's got to sit bad in your craw.

When you get back to Trump pulling Brennan's security clearance for no valid reason, I'll respond all you like. I'm not interested in talking about Obama.

OMG are you a dumbass.

Trump had a very valid reason you moron. Brennan isn't in Govt. anymore he doesn't need a security clearance.

Good Lord are you stupid.

They ALL keep their clearances unless there is valid reason to revoke it. If the President is going to change that long standing policy, it needs to be for EVERYONE, not just the people who criticize him.

No they don't. Where the hell would come up with a stupid tale like that.

There is no reason for anyone out of Govt. service to have security clearance.

Claudette, it's the truth. Look it up.

lord knows you won't.

 

[OldLady]

No, fuck YOUR partisan politics. That is all you got with this argument.
Little hands is going to pay for this one.

no he won't, because Breenan is a piece of shit. most CIA people don't go on tv and trash the current President......

but what should I expect from people that think their side has a right to do anything to our side based on some bullshit that we are fascists so therefore we have no rights.

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

Well you are wrong. Calling the President a traitor is enough, and he's done much much more than that. He is not trying to work with or help this President, hence he does not need one.......buh bye to the clearance

Calling the President a traitor is enough
Pull everyone's, then. Don't make it such an obvious abuse of power on Trump's part. Bad optics for a man who is trying not to act like a dictator.

Calling the President a dog would have been more accurate.

 

[iceberg]

heh - hissy fit. who's the one that can't answer base questions and then screams at me then ignores me for awhile only to come back later with the same stubborn crap that we had issues with before?

that would be - well get a mirror and guess.

and hey - i was right. giving you all those links about obama attacking the press was a total and complete waste of time. i've come to find you'll stay stupid shit (strip searches at the border) and then throw your own hissy fit when i ask where you heard that, please provide a link. no - you just proclaim i'm being an ass (and at times i am, yes) and i must be ignored.

yet again - i'm right about you. that's got to sit bad in your craw.

When you get back to Trump pulling Brennan's security clearance for no valid reason, I'll respond all you like. I'm not interested in talking about Obama.

like i said when this started and you asked for info; it would be a total and complete waste of time to give it to you.

i win again.

go back to ignoring me now. anything else you do my reply is just gonna make you throw a tantrum and ignore me.

again.

btw -

13 WAYS TO LOSE YOUR SECURITY CLEARANCE | Virginia Workplace Discrimination Lawyers | Maryland Wrongful Termination Law Firm

looks like there are many valid ways your clearance can be lost - of which working to overthrow the gov is on that list.

if brennan is NOT trying to get trump out of office, then what else is his purpose here? seems to be that is a valid reason in itself but i'm sure it's not for you.

Voicing a critical opinion of the President's action or statement is not "working to overthrow the government," though. You know that.

Have you ever been critical of Obama? Were you trying to "overthrow the government?"

wow. your abstinence from obama talk and referencing didn't last long, did it? how come YOU can bring him up to prove a point but *I* can't?

I was responding to a question.

amazing. that's what i was doing as well. using sources of similarity of situations to illustrate people act differently to the same thing being done by people they like or approve of vs. people they don't. that sent you into an unholy tizzy it would seem and you pouted you'd never talk about obama again.

guess you left off "until it suits my purposes" on that sentence.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

awwwww, did he lose his security clearance, now he can't lie to people and say he saw classified material that indicts Trump......this faggot deserved to lose his clearance and fuck his partisan politics

No, fuck YOUR partisan politics. That is all you got with this argument.
Little hands is going to pay for this one.

no he won't, because Breenan is a piece of shit. most CIA people don't go on tv and trash the current President......

but what should I expect from people that think their side has a right to do anything to our side based on some bullshit that we are fascists so therefore we have no rights.

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

Irrelevant. They should be pulled by default from all holding them immediately upon leaving their office, unless there is some compelling reason for them to retain them.

I do mean all.

You realize that most people were not aware they retained them, until quite recently.

 

[Thinker101]

no he won't, because Breenan is a piece of shit. most CIA people don't go on tv and trash the current President......

but what should I expect from people that think their side has a right to do anything to our side based on some bullshit that we are fascists so therefore we have no rights.

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

Well you are wrong. Calling the President a traitor is enough, and he's done much much more than that. He is not trying to work with or help this President, hence he does not need one.......buh bye to the clearance

Calling the President a traitor is enough
Pull everyone's, then. Don't make it such an obvious abuse of power on Trump's part. Bad optics for a man who is trying not to act like a dictator.

Calling the President a dog would have been more accurate.

Hmmm...seems as though nothing is ever enough for you loons.

 

[joaquinmiller]

But as usual, you are dragging Obama into this when it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama. Nothing. Obama never revoked a security clearance because he didn't like the guy's commentary; no President ever has before.

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

The point is the meeting is a nothing burger. That is the only thing you guys have and it's nothing.
The Clintons spyed on an opponent campaign with a fake document.....lets investigate that......we actually have something to investigate.

Whose word do you have that it was a "nothing burger"?

 

[mudwhistle]

But as usual, you are dragging Obama into this when it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama. Nothing. Obama never revoked a security clearance because he didn't like the guy's commentary; no President ever has before.

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

The point is the meeting is a nothing burger. That is the only thing you guys have and it's nothing.
The Clintons spyed on an opponent campaign with a fake document.....lets investigate that......we actually have something to investigate.

This is the same crew that tried to convince us a video killed four Americans.

 

[Doc1]

Brennan has a right to his opinion.

Indeed, but no right to a security clearance.

He has not done anything to have it pulled.

Well you are wrong. Calling the President a traitor is enough, and he's done much much more than that. He is not trying to work with or help this President, hence he does not need one.......buh bye to the clearance

Calling the President a traitor is enough
Pull everyone's, then. Don't make it such an obvious abuse of power on Trump's part. Bad optics for a man who is trying not to act like a dictator.

Calling the President a dog would have been more accurate.

Hmmm...seems as though nothing is ever enough for you loons.

Short of abject capitulation on virtually every issue?
No.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Honest Don:

Trump On Mueller Interview: "I Would Do It Under Oath"

Trump’s lawyers prepare to fight subpoena all the way to the Supreme Court

You seem to be confusing what Trump has said what he wants to do with what his lawyers are doing and get paid to do....

...but don't let a little thing like reality / truth get in your way.

Trump is not in charge? You funny.

I'm not confused. I know the last thing Hush Money wants to do is talk to Mueller under oath.

 

[depotoo]

Lap this up-

Clinton paid Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who hired Christopher Steele; Bruce Ohr, who works for DOJ and his wife worked for Fusion, who gave info to FBI, that they then used info from that was unverified to go spy on the Trump campaign.


John Brennan leaked info to Harry Reid, James Clapper lies under oath to the Intel committee, James Comey fired for leaking info and other things, Andrew McCabe fired for lying under oath 3 times, Sally Yates DOJ fired, Peter Strzok demoted then fired, Lisa Page FBI attorney demoted, then left, Jim Baker, chief counsel demoted, then left, all under recommendations from IG. Oh, and Christopher Steele was caught lying and fired.

nothing. i never said he was. i think we're so divided as a country we use terms we'd not normally use to get a point across that really isn't a point.

brennan hates trump. he's far from alone. as long as that did not interfere with him doing his job, leave it alone. if it did, i can see the revoke. did trump do this because brennan hates him? maybe. lord knows obama did it to journalists he hated and the left looked away. those bad journalists deserved it. i mean, breaking fast and furious - how dare you report what our president and his staff is doing!

did you cry out then? i wasn't here so i don't know and won't speak for you. but it remains a valid question.

we can't get mad at people ONLY cause we hate them and let people we like do the same or similar things. it sets a bad tone and people tend to as human nature dictates, one up the situation. a "hold my beer" if you will both sides are engaged in and we root our side on to the finish cause the other side is... well the other side.

i think our last 2 presidents are pretty petty overall. one just spoke well when his teleprompter works and the other has a teleprompter borrowed from an elementary school play. neither is "good" in my mind and both are dividing this country up as we fight for one idiot over another as if that's really more than a pyrrhic victory.

But as usual, you are dragging Obama into this when it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama. Nothing. Obama never revoked a security clearance because he didn't like the guy's commentary; no President ever has before.

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

 

[iceberg]

Lap this up-

Clinton paid Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who hired Christopher Steele; Bruce Ohr, who works for DOJ and his wife worked for Fusion, who gave info to FBI, that they then used info from that was unverified to go spy on the Trump campaign.


John Brennan leaked info to Harry Reid, James Clapper lies under oath to the Intel committee, James Comey fired for leaking info and other things, Andrew McCabe fired for lying under oath 3 times, Sally Yates DOJ fired, Peter Strzok demoted then fired, Lisa Page FBI attorney demoted, then left, Jim Baker, chief counsel demoted, then left, all under recommendations from IG.

But as usual, you are dragging Obama into this when it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama. Nothing. Obama never revoked a security clearance because he didn't like the guy's commentary; no President ever has before.

Because no one ever did what Brenan did.
Show me one republican that called Obama a traitor
or one that was on constantly saying he colluded with a foreign government
Show me the harshest criticism from a republican CIA director.

How many campaigns have taken meetings with a Kremlin-connected lawyer, reflecting "Russia and its government's support" of the candidate, and then lied about it for months?

was the lawyer an agent of the russian government?

the "lie" seems to be altering things like lawyers now agents and "illegal" being left off immigration when it suits the left. looks like that continues in you.

good job.

This is what they were told, in advance: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Lap it up.

First, they "forgot about" the meeting, then they lied about the meeting. At what point do you think they will start telling the truth about it?

that's a whole lot of lappin. funny how all these direct actions, names and results are clear and named. yet not enough. but somehow we know enough about 1 private meeting to impeach a president.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In a blistering editorial John Brennan strikes back against the compromised crook sitting in what should now be called the Offal Office.

From the Op-Ed:

Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash.

The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of “Trump Incorporated” attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets. A jury is about to deliberate bank and tax fraud charges against one of those people, Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman. And the campaign’s former deputy chairman, Rick Gates, has pleaded guilty to financial fraud and lying to investigators

Mr. Trump clearly has become more desperate to protect himself and those close to him, which is why he made the politically motivated decision to revoke my security clearance in an attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to challenge him. Now more than ever, it is critically important that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his team of investigators be allowed to complete their work without interference — from Mr. Trump or anyone else — so that all Americans can get the answers they so rightly deserve.

Opinion | John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash

He is right. Brennan is our Paul Revere. Don't let the colluder shut you up. Your country needs you.

What an incoherent editorial. Brennan is a fucking moron, how was he in charge of ANYTHING in our government?