bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,169
- 47,316
- 2,180
It also shows it was a common thing for him to do in his life, not for a campaign. Your attempt to criminalize the payment fails.
It is not my attempt, it is the attempt of the Southern District of New York. Time will tell what the outcome is.
Well, I don't live in the Southern District of New York, so I don't care if they waste tax dollars. We can look at John Edwards' trial and know what the outcome is going to be.
I would not put too much stock in the Edwards case, there are many differences, the main one being that none of his payments were during the actual election process. When he made his payments not a single primary had been held yet. This is not a small difference.
And yet he was indicted and tried...and found NOT guilty.
Correct. But his circumstances were different than Trumps so it does not really apply to Trump's case.
True, they were fare more incriminating that Trumps, and it wasn't even his own money.