"personhood" idiocy in N Dakota

And before you say it...not the vagina. About six inches higher, where the human life is. Don't avert your eyes to the vagina.
 
North Dakota Personhood Measure Passes State Senate

"These bills just open the door for every other state in the country to interject themselves into everybody's bedroom."

Which is exactly what the rw's want. The more laws and the more intrusive, the better.

Saving lives is just so wrong!! Why is it a person that finds it so exceptable to casually discard life as they do,they were once a small unborn human being themselves,yet somehow they conjure up the notion that its not human ,and are willing to demonize anyone that says different. What kind of person can be that way??
 
Personhood bills are a whole different conversation than pro-life vs prochoice. You're pro-life, ok, work at restricting abortion in your state and repealing roe vs wade, but everyone should be against personhood bills. They aren't anti-abortion, they're pro-government choice.
 
Personhood bills are a whole different conversation than pro-life vs prochoice. You're pro-life, ok, work at restricting abortion in your state and repealing roe vs wade, but everyone should be against personhood bills. They aren't anti-abortion, they're pro-government choice.

One problem is, the right is not averse to trashing the Constitution in their all out bid to control every aspect of our lives.

Another problem is that rw's do not recognize the difference or care that there is a difference.
 
More huffo puffo fluffo put as 'fact' by a troll...


yawn

Oh, so its untrue because of the source? Are you saying this is not true:

North Dakota lawmakers passed a Personhood Constitutional Amendment initiative on Thursday that would amend the state's constitution to give legal rights and protections to human embryos. If the ballot initiative passes the House, North Dakota voters will decide on it during the 2014 elections.

Prove it. Post a true source that says that N Dak senate did not pass this bill or stfu because, in point of fact, your post is a prime example of cowardly trolling.

troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may also refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted."

If you've got the courage, comment on the content.
 
Riddle:

To the right, what's the difference between a woman, fertilized egg and a corporation?

One isn't considered a person.
 
More huffo puffo fluffo put as 'fact' by a troll...


yawn

Oh, so its untrue because of the source? Are you saying this is not true:

North Dakota lawmakers passed a Personhood Constitutional Amendment initiative on Thursday that would amend the state's constitution to give legal rights and protections to human embryos. If the ballot initiative passes the House, North Dakota voters will decide on it during the 2014 elections.

Prove it. Post a true source that says that N Dak senate did not pass this bill or stfu because, in point of fact, your post is a prime example of cowardly trolling.

troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may also refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted."

If you've got the courage, comment on the content.

Just what I expected.

Untrue accusations and then run away ad disappear. LOL
 
Personhood bills are a whole different conversation than pro-life vs prochoice. You're pro-life, ok, work at restricting abortion in your state and repealing roe vs wade, but everyone should be against personhood bills. They aren't anti-abortion, they're pro-government choice.

The only way an abortion can occur in the first place is for the personhood of the fetus to be denied.

So to reverse Roe v. Wade, you have to reverse the non-personhood of the fetus.
 
Personhood bills are a whole different conversation than pro-life vs prochoice. You're pro-life, ok, work at restricting abortion in your state and repealing roe vs wade, but everyone should be against personhood bills. They aren't anti-abortion, they're pro-government choice.

The only way an abortion can occur in the first place is for the personhood of the fetus to be denied.

So to reverse Roe v. Wade, you have to reverse the non-personhood of the fetus.

No, you can argue a fetus has a right to life without granting that life full personhood rights. To give a fetus all the rights you give born people, is to give the state jurisdiction over a woman's body.
 
I think many people don't understand that when you declare a fetus a person, you grant that person a host of rights, and you grant the state the right to step in and speak for the person.

Works for me...even you started your life off at conception... Amy
 
Personhood bills are a whole different conversation than pro-life vs prochoice. You're pro-life, ok, work at restricting abortion in your state and repealing roe vs wade, but everyone should be against personhood bills. They aren't anti-abortion, they're pro-government choice.

The only way an abortion can occur in the first place is for the personhood of the fetus to be denied.

So to reverse Roe v. Wade, you have to reverse the non-personhood of the fetus.

No, you can argue a fetus has a right to life without granting that life full personhood rights. To give a fetus all the rights you give born people, is to give the state jurisdiction over a woman's body.

How does giving a fetus a right to life not meet the "state jurisdiction over a woman's body" that personhood does?

What's the difference?
 

Forum List

Back
Top