Peter Navvaro Being Thrown In Prison For Being A Friend Of Donald J Trump

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You notice Liberals have all the Repubs going to prison but when it comes to THEM like Hunter or Hillary, no prison time!

.

Not YET, anyway.

10 months and 3 days.

.

 

[Robert W]

Eric Holder was found in contempt for not turning over documents to Congress. The courts later found he was protected by executive privilege which barred his prosecution. This is a far cry from Navarro's case.

Navarro was an executive working for Trump. And by law is protected. Sure, the safe way not to be prosecuted is when there is a Democrat president and a Democrat administration. Navarro was entitled to protection.

 

[leftwinger]

If you and I flagrantly violated a court and congressional subpoena and were found to be in contempt, we would be sent to jail. Peter Navarro is not above the law.

But Eric Holder or Hunter Biden or any Clinton is. Got it//

 

[JLW]

Navarro was an executive working for Trump. And by law is protected. Sure, the safe way not to be prosecuted is when there is a Democrat president and a Democrat administration. Navarro was entitled to protection.

The courts did not see it that way. Navarro's attorneys raised executive privilege but were unable to produce any evidence of it. Even the US Supreme Court, a conservative court, refused to hear his case.

 

[Robert W]

Either murdered or his death faked and his"Body" sent to Qatar to live out the rest of his days on Earth.

Answer here:

 

[Robert W]

The courts did not see it that way. Navarro's attorneys raised executive privilege but were unable to produce any evidence of it. Even the US Supreme Court, a conservative court, refused to hear his case.

Departing from the practice in most serious or high-profile legal fights, Roberts ruled on Navarro’s request himself, without referring it to the full court. The chief justice noted that a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that Navarro failed to raise several challenges to the fairness of his conviction when he first sought to remain free pending appeal.

“I see no basis to disagree with the determination that Navarro forfeited those arguments in the release proceeding, which is distinct from his pending appeal on the merits,” Roberts wrote in his one-page order, emphasizing that the door remains open to the ex-Trump aide to challenge his convictions themselves.

 

[Marener]

Hunter didn't comply either....hmmm

He testified last month. When did Navarro testify?

 

[JLW]

Departing from the practice in most serious or high-profile legal fights, Roberts ruled on Navarro’s request himself, without referring it to the full court. The chief justice noted that a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that Navarro failed to raise several challenges to the fairness of his conviction when he first sought to remain free pending appeal.

“I see no basis to disagree with the determination that Navarro forfeited those arguments in the release proceeding, which is distinct from his pending appeal on the merits,” Roberts wrote in his one-page order, emphasizing that the door remains open to the ex-Trump aide to challenge his convictions themselves.

So, in other words, his lawyers were either incompetent or Navarro did not have the proof. Be that as it may, he is like anyone else similarly situated, he was found in contempt and must pay the piper.

 

[mudwhistle]

Answer here:

Somebody used Epstein to set people up for blackmail in Washington.
And then when Obama became president, Obama took our intelligence agencies and turned it inward against us.
This is what happens when you vote communists into office.
The thing they fear the most is their own people.

 

[mudwhistle]

Departing from the practice in most serious or high-profile legal fights, Roberts ruled on Navarro’s request himself, without referring it to the full court. The chief justice noted that a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that Navarro failed to raise several challenges to the fairness of his conviction when he first sought to remain free pending appeal.

“I see no basis to disagree with the determination that Navarro forfeited those arguments in the release proceeding, which is distinct from his pending appeal on the merits,” Roberts wrote in his one-page order, emphasizing that the door remains open to the ex-Trump aide to challenge his convictions themselves.

Roberts isn't on the level.

He was put there by Bush, because most people felt he would help Republicans.
Judge Roberts only does what he's told.

 

[Marener]

Somebody used Epstein to set people up for blackmail in Washington.
And then when Obama became president, Obama took our intelligence agencies and turned it inward against us.
This is what happens when you vote communists into office.
The thing they fear the most is their own people.

Some people really can’t handle using the internet. They’re not smart enough to tell the bullshit conspiracies from reality.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Roberts isn't on the level.

He was put there by Bush, because most people felt he would help Republicans.
Judge Roberts only does what he's told.

You mean he isn't a Trump Humper, are you mad he isn't being told what to do by Trump?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He's going to prison.......and it's only because he's a friend of Trump's and refused to go along with the coup.

This is the Biden/Obama White House punishing their political opponents.

Textbook Soviet Justice.

He's being thrown in prison for doing pretty much what Eric Holder, Hunter Biden, and several other Obama officials did to congress.

This is a lie.

Navarro is going to prison after being lawfully convicted of the crimes he committed.

 

[skye]

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Just curious why republican judges didn't throw out these charges during appeal.

 

[mudwhistle]

You mean he isn't a Trump Humper, are you mad he isn't being told what to do by Trump?

If Trump ever told anyone on the Supreme Court how to vote, (like Obama did in pubic and in private) the Dummycraps would have impeached him immediately.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

If Trump ever told anyone on the Supreme Court how to vote, (like Obama did in pubic and in private) the Dummycraps would have impeached him immediately.

Pres. Obama had no reason to tell the Supreme Court anything, he wasn't breaking the law and being impeached every 6 mos.

 

[mudwhistle]

Pres. Obama had no reason to tell the Supreme Court anything, he wasn't breaking the law and being impeached every 6 mos.

No fucking shit.

How dare anyone impeach the Magic Negro.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No fucking shit.

How dare anyone impeach the Magic Negro.

You want to impeach him because he is black, quite sure that went out in 1964.