Police Doing Their Job

[squeeze berry]

Why were the police approaching them in the first place. They were in front of an open store and one had a grocery bag in his hand? Is shopping while black probable cause to be confronted by the police on private property in the first place now?

hey dixter, the group walked toward the cop


why did that group approach the cop and surround him unless they had murderous intentions?

 

[Moonglow]

If this HAD to happen, I wish it had been in NYC. I want the commie racist mayor to reap more of what he has sown. He might step down, although doubtful, as it is the media's fault...all of this...yeah sure, de Blasio!!!!!!!

de Blasio must have learned from the rapist who was elected twice by Democrats....
"On Jan. 21, 1998, the day the Monica Lewinsky story broke in the mainstream press, Morris says Clinton called, explained that he had "slipped up" with Lewinsky and asked Morris to take a poll about the potential impact. When Morris reported that Americans would favor his impeachment or resignation if he lied under oath, he says Clinton replied: "Well, we'll just have to win, then."
Washingtonpost.com Special Report Clinton Accused

Shame and rectitude are not part of the Liberal/Democrat makeup.

Yes, every registered democrat thinks that way......

I was going to point out that this was a most vapid defense of the Left.....

...but I realized you were just trying to fill out your post quota.

You post more than I, so you statement is just another public nuisance...

 

[Impenitent]

I

D
Execution by cop can happen to people of all races and every political stripe, and always happens at inconvenient times.

FARK.com 4671619 Texas governor Rick Perry s cousin killed in shootout with sheriff s deputies

Not race, not political perspective....only one factor is under the microscope.

Filter your post to only those who aim a gun at police, and you may not appear such an ass.
Let's keep the point front and center.

If "aiming a gun at a policeman" is the only thing under your microscope, then why do you bring up "De blasio, liberal democrats, crime not being the result of poverty, calling the left "dishonest" , and calling the left "Marxists "

I'm confused on which points are "front and center" in this thread.

Some folks can handle more than one idea at a time.

Clearly, that's not your ability.

So your advice to me is to "filter my post to only those who point a gun at police " yet you are free to level every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left that you can think of.

Seems quite hypocritical, although typical of your threads.

"....every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left..."

Help me out here.....I can't find any in either category.

An example would be borrowing Dennis Prager's opinion, as proof of your own, while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported.

 

[Dekster]

Why were the police approaching them in the first place. They were in front of an open store and one had a grocery bag in his hand? Is shopping while black probable cause to be confronted by the police on private property in the first place now?

I couldn't see much in the video but it appears that the two were in front of the store and walked down to where the police officer's car stopped. So no they were not just in front of a store.

They were walking through the parking lot after exiting the store. Something everybody does when they exit the store. Tell me where in that there is probably suspicion for the police to be pulling up into their path and jumping out of his car? Is walking on private property a crime? Should I start ordering my food from Amazon because being out in the line of sight of the police is all the reason they need to harass me?

 

[PoliticalChic]

If this HAD to happen, I wish it had been in NYC. I want the commie racist mayor to reap more of what he has sown. He might step down, although doubtful, as it is the media's fault...all of this...yeah sure, de Blasio!!!!!!!

de Blasio must have learned from the rapist who was elected twice by Democrats....
"On Jan. 21, 1998, the day the Monica Lewinsky story broke in the mainstream press, Morris says Clinton called, explained that he had "slipped up" with Lewinsky and asked Morris to take a poll about the potential impact. When Morris reported that Americans would favor his impeachment or resignation if he lied under oath, he says Clinton replied: "Well, we'll just have to win, then."
Washingtonpost.com Special Report Clinton Accused

Shame and rectitude are not part of the Liberal/Democrat makeup.

Yes, every registered democrat thinks that way......

I was going to point out that this was a most vapid defense of the Left.....

...but I realized you were just trying to fill out your post quota.

You post more than I, so you statement is just another public nuisance...

Recall what was pointed out earlier?
Mine have substance, an actual point with supporting quotes and documentation....

You remain a dilettante.

True?


My fondest hope is that with the New Year, you resolve to be more focused and attempt to put up more of a fight.....
...unless you reform, and agree that I'm always correct.

Mull that over.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I

Not race, not political perspective....only one factor is under the microscope.

Filter your post to only those who aim a gun at police, and you may not appear such an ass.
Let's keep the point front and center.

If "aiming a gun at a policeman" is the only thing under your microscope, then why do you bring up "De blasio, liberal democrats, crime not being the result of poverty, calling the left "dishonest" , and calling the left "Marxists "

I'm confused on which points are "front and center" in this thread.

Some folks can handle more than one idea at a time.

Clearly, that's not your ability.

So your advice to me is to "filter my post to only those who point a gun at police " yet you are free to level every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left that you can think of.

Seems quite hypocritical, although typical of your threads.

"....every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left..."

Help me out here.....I can't find any in either category.

An example would be borrowing Dennis Prager's opinion, as proof of your own, while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported.

1. "borrowing"????
First, he has a reputation for expertise in the areas under discussion.
Second....the term suggests plagiarism....which would be a lie on your part.
Third....if/when you move from junior high school on to higher grades....should that occur....you will be taught about footnotes, links, quotes,etc.


2. "...while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported."
Millions of folks would disagree with your implication....but, either way, why isn't that your job?
What am I, Scrubbing Bubbles,...'we work hard so you don't have to'????

Stop being so Liberal...er, I mean lazy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why were the police approaching them in the first place. They were in front of an open store and one had a grocery bag in his hand? Is shopping while black probable cause to be confronted by the police on private property in the first place now?

I couldn't see much in the video but it appears that the two were in front of the store and walked down to where the police officer's car stopped. So no they were not just in front of a store.

They were walking through the parking lot after exiting the store. Something everybody does when they exit the store. Tell me where in that there is probably suspicion for the police to be pulling up into their path and jumping out of his car? Is walking on private property a crime? Should I start ordering my food from Amazon because being out in the line of sight of the police is all the reason they need to harass me?

Part of the job description of being a law enforcement officer is to recognize something that might require further investigation.
Clearly, he was correct, and, just as clearly, you are a dolt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What happens when the highest elected officials encourage, facilitate.....illegality.


11. "Had Brown successfully wrestled away Officer Wilson’s gun and killed him, or had Myers fatally shot with his first three rounds the off-duty officer, there would have been no suggestion that the fatal shootings involved race, and there would have been no post-shooting violence — and Eric Holder would not have seen anything emblematic in just another police killing.

Indeed, had both officers been killed by Brown and Myers, they would now be little remembered. In some sick sense, when Wilson was not hit by his own gun that was fired twice in the car, and when the St. Louis officer was not hit by Myers’ first three shots, then the crimes became racialized and violence followed. In the twisted logic of politicized interracial crime, the two officers committed the gaffe of not getting killed.


....crime is a serious business, because it breaks society apart along tribal lines. It is all the more dangerous when elected officials like the president and attorney general are sometimes the worst offenders, given their racialist slurs like “nation of cowards,” “punish our enemies,” and “typical white person” and cheap editorializing in the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown cases. So on their cue, are we to look at lurid fatal crimes in the news and see them not as matters of individual evil acts, but rather as collective tokens of larger racial hatred? And are we to detect some sort of state culpability that suggests shared guilt for the violence?"
Crimes of Exactly What Works and Days



Just wondering.....had Obama voters known, early on, that this would be the behavior of their candidate.....

....would they still have voted for him?

 

[dannyboys]

Why were the police approaching them in the first place. They were in front of an open store and one had a grocery bag in his hand? Is shopping while black probable cause to be confronted by the police on private property in the first place now?

I couldn't see much in the video but it appears that the two were in front of the store and walked down to where the police officer's car stopped. So no they were not just in front of a store.

They were walking through the parking lot after exiting the store. Something everybody does when they exit the store. Tell me where in that there is probably suspicion for the police to be pulling up into their path and jumping out of his car? Is walking on private property a crime? Should I start ordering my food from Amazon because being out in the line of sight of the police is all the reason they need to harass me?

You stupid feral **** negro.
The cop didn't "jump out of his car" and you know it liar!
Did you watch the tape? The cop spoke with the negroes. Just talking.
Then the very happily fucking dead Tree Dweller pulled a gun and pointed it at the cops head. The cop 'took out the fucking garbage'.
Go suck on another BBC.

 

[Impenitent]

I
If "aiming a gun at a policeman" is the only thing under your microscope, then why do you bring up "De blasio, liberal democrats, crime not being the result of poverty, calling the left "dishonest" , and calling the left "Marxists "

I'm confused on which points are "front and center" in this thread.

Some folks can handle more than one idea at a time.

Clearly, that's not your ability.

So your advice to me is to "filter my post to only those who point a gun at police " yet you are free to level every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left that you can think of.

Seems quite hypocritical, although typical of your threads.

"....every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left..."

Help me out here.....I can't find any in either category.

An example would be borrowing Dennis Prager's opinion, as proof of your own, while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported.

1. "borrowing"????
First, he has a reputation for expertise in the areas under discussion.
Second....the term suggests plagiarism....which would be a lie on your part.
Third....if/when you move from junior high school on to higher grades....should that occur....you will be taught about footnotes, links, quotes,etc.


2. "...while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported."
Millions of folks would disagree with your implication....but, either way, why isn't that your job?
What am I, Scrubbing Bubbles,...'we work hard so you don't have to'????

Stop being so Liberal...er, I mean lazy.

I didn't accuse you of plaigarism, in fact acknowledged borrowing is the antithesis of plagiarism , as in this definition: "plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source is usually enough to prevent plagiarism."

You seem to be seeking insult rather than debate,

Yet still, borrowing another opinion does not prove you own.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Some folks can handle more than one idea at a time.

Clearly, that's not your ability.

So your advice to me is to "filter my post to only those who point a gun at police " yet you are free to level every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left that you can think of.

Seems quite hypocritical, although typical of your threads.

"....every dishonest, unsupported accusation about the left..."

Help me out here.....I can't find any in either category.

An example would be borrowing Dennis Prager's opinion, as proof of your own, while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported.

1. "borrowing"????
First, he has a reputation for expertise in the areas under discussion.
Second....the term suggests plagiarism....which would be a lie on your part.
Third....if/when you move from junior high school on to higher grades....should that occur....you will be taught about footnotes, links, quotes,etc.


2. "...while failing to point out that Prager's opinion might also be biased and unsupported."
Millions of folks would disagree with your implication....but, either way, why isn't that your job?
What am I, Scrubbing Bubbles,...'we work hard so you don't have to'????

Stop being so Liberal...er, I mean lazy.

I didn't accuse you of plaigarism, in fact acknowledged borrowing is the antithesis of plagiarism , as in this definition: "plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source is usually enough to prevent plagiarism."

You seem to be seeking insult rather than debate,

Yet still, borrowing another opinion does not prove you own.

"I didn't accuse you of plaigarism, (sic).."

Aha....I should have recognized that you are simply less than articulate.



"Yet still, borrowing another opinion does not prove you own."

So....you believe that I select quotes at random?
Once more, you seem to lack an intellect.

 

[skookerasbil]

I agree.........we need to have a conversation about race......and it starts like this...........

"You see s0ns........its time to pull up your pants and for Christsakes, when a cop says, "Stop and put up your hands!!" you put your hands up.....like immediately. If you don't, you're definitely gonna get your hat knocked off just like Mike Brown....."

or something very similar.............



And by the way.........for those progressive assholes living in Bumfook and Irrelevantstown USA, the protests are a joke here in NYC.....being throttled up by CNN and FOX like you had this massive bunch of protests. And.........ready for this.......80%+ of the protestors.........a fucking white!!!. Has nothing to do at all with race......its all these mental case anarchists with nothing better to do because they are losers looking for a cause..........any cause.

 

[squeeze berry]

why did a teen have a handgun?
don't you need to be 21 to own one?

he approached the officer with the intent to kill

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hmmm....if every event that involves a white police officer shooting someone who isn't white.....
....well, perhaps we should all apply the racialist logic that the Liberal/Progressive/Democrats use when viewing criminal acts?



12. ".... are we to look at lurid fatal crimes in the news and see them not as matters of individual evil acts, but rather as collective tokens of larger racial hatred? And are we to detect some sort of state culpability that suggests shared guilt for the violence?
...[let's recall some other] abhorrent interracial violence and some disturbing laxity on the part of government.


a. African-American and Muslim convert Zale Thompson just attacked two New York policemen with an ax. Thompson had posted virulent anti-white invectives on the Internet ...


b. ....Ali Muhammad Brown murder 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin out of religious, racial, or anti-American hatred? Why was the convicted child rapist Brown, with a long rap sheet, out at all? .... Should Eric Holder have held a press conference to exemplify Brown — who is a suspect in multiple murders — as illustrative of hate crimes, or the failure of the racialist American state to keep such psychopaths behind bars?


c. The body of coed Hannah Grahamhas just been found. Suspect Jesse Matthew is for now charged with intent to defile the late Graham. He likewise has a prior record and has been a person of interest in past serial sexual assaults and prior female disappearances. In the age of Eric Holder’s racializing violence, does the fact that Matthew is African-American and Graham is white play some part in her savage murder? Why do such violent criminals seem repeatedly to be lost track of by the criminal justice system? Is this, too, a Michael Brown teachable moment?


d. One of the most horrific of this autumn’s crimes wasthe grotesque beheading of Colleen Huffordin Oklahoma late last month by Alton Alexander Nolen (aka Jah’Keem Yisrael). Again, in the age when Obama references Ferguson to the UN, are we supposed to note that Nolen was black and Hufford white — especially given that Nolen’s freedom is emblematic of a flawed criminal justice system that released him early from prison after he was convicted of assault and battery on a police officer? Is this an occasion for a Trayvon Martin moment of presidential racial editorializing?"
Crimes of Exactly What Works and Days


Kinda like the pot calling the kettle black...or something......

 

[SAYIT]

What do conservatives like most about this article? That a cop lived and did the right thing? Or that a dangerous negro, representative of all the ******* of course, raised by thug mamas (thanks bucs90 ) is dead?

I think we all know the answer.

I do. It's that like-minded idiots rioted when the news broke.

 

[SAYIT]

Sorry for not being PC enough but I dont care.

Im so thankful the cop was unharmed.

I dont care that the world lost a thug.

And yes...thug mamas who raise these undisciplined criminal losers need to be held accountable. If they were better moms their offspring wouldnt be so predictably violent.

It's Christmas Eve and thankfully the cop may be home with his family instead of in the morgue.

 

[SAYIT]

What do conservatives like most about this article? That a cop lived and did the right thing? Or that a dangerous negro, representative of all the ******* of course, raised by thug mamas (thanks bucs90 ) is dead?

I think we all know the answer.

I asked you a question....why are you so afraid to answer?

Because he is dishonest.

If this was an article about a black guy getting arrested you two wouldn't even bother reading it. But the negro got popped! Lol at the dumb negro!!! Let me go to my internet forum to tell my sick conservative friends about the dumb negro! Lololol.

You're so transparent.

Nope. If a black man...or any man...commits a crime...and humbly accepts his consequence and doesnt resist...I actually hope the man learns his lesson and turns his life around.

But when a thug who is willing to shoot a cop gets erased...im happy. Thugs like that would harm me or my family just as coldly and now they cant.

Cool. That's not the motivation behind this thread though.

It certainly is.

 

[SAYIT]

What do conservatives like most about this article? That a cop lived and did the right thing? Or that a dangerous negro, representative of all the ******* of course, raised by thug mamas (thanks bucs90 ) is dead?

I think we all know the answer.

sadly, on point here

The point you are inadvertently making is the verification of the major difference between Left and Right.

"While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty." Dennis Prager

Prager's opinions are NOT highly regarded by most people

You mean most people like YOU.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And, if we're gonna generalize......why stop with race.....


13. "Last week one Marcelo Marquez (aka Luis Enrique Monroy-Bracamonte) for all practical purposes executed two Northern California sheriffs. An apparent illegal alien, he had purportedlybeen deported twice to Mexico for felonies. Is he now a green-card holder, a recipient of amnesty, or a felonious illegal resident of more than a decade.... how exactly did he operate for so long without worry about a third deportation?
Can President Obama address the UN about these unnecessary deaths?


So are those tragic deaths to be a teachable moment? About what exactly? The culpability of the federal government in encouraging illegal immigration? Racial hatred?


Had the two white deputies survived, and shot and killed an armed Marquez and his armed wife, would we now be subject to lectures about racist treatment of immigrants?"
Crimes of Exactly What Works and Days



It is this administration, this Liberal/Progressive Democrat administration that is the cause, and the explanation for the societal problems that America faces today....

....and may prove fatal to this once great nation.

 

[Dekster]

Why were the police approaching them in the first place. They were in front of an open store and one had a grocery bag in his hand? Is shopping while black probable cause to be confronted by the police on private property in the first place now?

I couldn't see much in the video but it appears that the two were in front of the store and walked down to where the police officer's car stopped. So no they were not just in front of a store.

They were walking through the parking lot after exiting the store. Something everybody does when they exit the store. Tell me where in that there is probably suspicion for the police to be pulling up into their path and jumping out of his car? Is walking on private property a crime? Should I start ordering my food from Amazon because being out in the line of sight of the police is all the reason they need to harass me?

Part of the job description of being a law enforcement officer is to recognize something that might require further investigation.
Clearly, he was correct, and, just as clearly, you are a dolt.

Clearly he was not correct and being called a dolt by the dullest pencil in the box just makes my day. Who doesn't like themselves some irony?