POLL: Are USMB Trump supporters okay with this plan?

Do you agree with this plan?


  • Total voters
    25
Yet you vote for the perverts that are pushing it, go freaking figure.

.
Sure...............

MO state senator suggests 12-year-olds should get married​

1682752795473.png
The Kansas City Star
https://www.kansascity.com › news › article274244525

Apr 13, 2023 — Missouri state Sen. Mike Moon suggested this week that children as young as 12 years old should be able to get married.

Missouri lawmaker defends 12-year-olds getting married​

1682752820880.png
FOX 2
https://fox2now.com › news › missouri-lawmaker-def...

Apr 13, 2023 — Missouri State Sen. Mike Moon (R-Ash Grove) said on the floor Tuesday that he knew at least one person who got married at 12 years old and ...
 
What the fuck is a teabagger, and no, we don't want to hear of your sexual fetishes?

Tea Party | Join the Movement. Support Tea Party.​

1682753467116.png
TeaParty.org
https://teaparty.org

(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Former President Donald Trump is not about to let go of what happened during the 2020 presidential election when he and millions ...

image6365032x.jpg


GettyImages-149152633.jpg.optimized.jpg


Tea%20Party%20Nation.jpg

 
Sure...............

MO state senator suggests 12-year-olds should get married

View attachment 780651
The Kansas City Star
https://www.kansascity.com › news › article274244525
Apr 13, 2023 — Missouri state Sen. Mike Moon suggested this week that children as young as 12 years old should be able to get married.

Missouri lawmaker defends 12-year-olds getting married

View attachment 780652
FOX 2
https://fox2now.com › news › missouri-lawmaker-def...
Apr 13, 2023 — Missouri State Sen. Mike Moon (R-Ash Grove) said on the floor Tuesday that he knew at least one person who got married at 12 years old and ...


Two sentences with drastically different meanings, which is true?

.
 
Dumb ass virtually all public schools allow muslim students to pray during school hours and many have designated prayer rooms.

.
STUPID fuck, that's what I stated earlier......
NOTHING wrong with that, christians have their designated clubs and meetings too.
 
The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

  • Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
  • What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
  • Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
  • What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
  • Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
  • Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
  • Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).



All of this trans bullshit, and culture war bullshit, is a complete distraction from that pandemic hoax.


I swear, the American public has the attention span of a gnat.

If it isn't right in front of them, day after day, and part of the agenda on the plate, served up by the left wing and right wing media, addressed by both lefty and righty pols & pundits, then they don't want to talk about it, and aren't concerned about it anymore. Even though, in the end, it will have far more affect on everyone, like it or not.

The fact is, both Trump and Biden, are both owned by Big Pharma, the institutional investors, and the media cabal, and they have both failed the US public, and the world.

They have both declared their intentions to not even discuss having a competitive primary with other folks to discuss their failures.

This whole thing is as rigged as a dictatorship. The same cabal owns all the media, the economy, the establishment and legal system, and both the parties. And now they are having the low IQ folks argue over these teed-up, silly culture war issues, which frankly? The folks who are really in control, don't give two shits worth about.

3 Hellacious Questions for Presidential Candidate Donald Trump

Trump-Artwork_678x452.jpg



"ONE: When are you going to admit you fronted for, and pushed, the high-speed release of DEVASTATING COVID vaccines that are injuring and killing huge numbers of people all over the world?

<snip>

"TWO: When are you going to admit you stepped aside and appointed that little pipsqueak freakazoid Tony Fauci interim President of the United States and sat in a corner and sucked your thumb and allowed him to lock down the whole country and LAY WASTE to the economy?"

<snip>

THREE: What the hell happened when you were a day away from declaring the Mexican drug cartels terrorist groups—and then backed off? . . . . "

<snip>

"—Funny thing, Don. Your horrific positions on the vaccine, the economy, and the Mex cartels—they EXACTLY MATCHED the positions of the LEFTIST press and the LEFTIST federal bureaucracy.

That’s a brain-stunner, isn’t it, Don?

I mean, isn’t anybody SEEING THAT?

I’m sure you are.

Unless your preoccupation with building yourself up by making promises you’ll never keep is taking every waking minute of every day, and you have no time for…what’s it called?

REFLECTION.

REMEMBERING.

ASSESSING.. . . "
 
well move to Canada…they are still subjects of the King there
Wow.
That Trump U. "history' correspondence course really paid off.

In 1982, it adopted its own constitution and became a completely independent country. Although it’s still part of the British Commonwealth—a constitutional monarchy that accepts the British monarch as its own. Charles III is King of Canada. However, his role is essentially ceremonial, and he does not interfere in Canadian self-governance.
 
Wow.
That Trump U. "history' correspondence course really paid off.

In 1982, it adopted its own constitution and became a completely independent country. Although it’s still part of the British Commonwealth—a constitutional monarchy that accepts the British monarch as its own. Charles III is King of Canada. However, his role is essentially ceremonial, and he does not interfere in Canadian self-governance.
haha did you not read what you cut and pasta and quoted?

what part of it still being a Commonwealth State that accepts the British Monarchyas its own and King Charles as their king don’t you understand?? hahah

wow…you were likely one of those unhappy Trump U customers that failed cause they couldn’t read
 
haha did you not read what you cut and pasta and quoted?

what part of it still being a Commonwealth State that accepts the British Monarchyas its own and King Charles as their king don’t you understand?? hahah

wow…you were likely one of those unhappy Trump U customers that failed cause they couldn’t read

" However, his role is essentially ceremonial, and he does not interfere in Canadian self-governance".
 
" However, his role is essentially ceremonial, and he does not interfere in Canadian self-governance".
ok…but he’s still their king…hence they are his subjects…just like in the UK

geez man…i forgot you are are rhe idiot that thought the legislative and executive branches ran the judical branch…how in the world…my mistake…i forgot you were that dumb…i shouldn’t expect you to understand foreign systems of govt
 
ok…but he’s still their king…hence they are his subjects…just like in the UK
NO, they aren't you......DUMBASS.
geez man…i forgot you are are rhe idiot that thought the legislative and executive branches ran the judical branch…
They do, you fucking retard, Q-NUT.

Supreme Court ethics bill advances out of House ...​

1682757269751.png
SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com › Newsfeed

May 12, 2022 — Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., announced sweeping ethics legislationon Tuesday that would impose a code of conduct on the justices and would ban them ...

Outside groups take a first stab at a Supreme Court ethics ...​


NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2023/03/09 › outside-groups-take...

Mar 9, 2023 — While she thinks that Congress could write an ethics code for the court, it would be far better for the justices to do it themselves.

ArtII.S2.C2.3.5 Appointments of Justices to the Supreme Court​

1682757350400.png
Congress.gov
https://constitution.congress.gov › ALDE_00013096

The Appointments Clause provides that the President shall appoint, subject to Senate confirmation, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other officers of ...
how in the world…my mistake…i forgot you were that dumb…i shouldn’t expect you to understand foreign systems of govt
STUPID fuck.
 
The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

  • Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
  • What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
  • Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
  • What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
  • Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
  • Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
  • Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).



You don't have to be a specific supporter of anyone, a responsible adult, especially parents of children, should be appalled at what's going on in the education system.
 

Forum List

Back
Top