Poll: Should Trump accept a plea deal or risk a trial?

Should Trump accept a plea deal or risk a trial?


  • Total voters
    33
By next year the evidence will be called "false narrative." Mark my words. This is a hyped up replay of the Democrat "I win you lose" hack.

"Mark my words' isn't a legal standard. Its your imagination.

This is why its essentially impossible to have a rational discussion with a conservative. You present them evidence, they counter with their imagination.

Alas, the evidence laid out in the indictment doesn't disappear just because you want us to 'mark your words'. The transcript of the recording where Trump admits that the document he's showing to a staffer is classified......doesn't disappear. The classified documents that were seized from Trump's residence don't disappear. The pictures, the witness testimony, the recordings.

None of it disappears.
 
"Mark my words' isn't a legal standard. Its your imagination.

This is why its essentially impossible to have a rational discussion with a conservative. You present them evidence, they counter with their imagination.

Alas, the evidence laid out in the indictment doesn't disappear just because you want us to 'mark your words'. The transcript of the recording where Trump admits that the document he's showing to a staffer is classified......doesn't disappear. The classified documents that were seized from Trump's residence don't disappear. The pictures, the witness testimony, the recordings.

None of it disappears.
 
Not sure you could legally do that.
The way I understand it is: If Trump is convicted of treason (e.g. holding classified documents and parading them around to others) he can be barred from running for a presidential candidacy, or rather excluded from becoming President of the USA. Just lying, loudmouthing and screwing around - aka cheating on his wife can't prevent him from being elected as President.
 
The way I understand it is: If Trump is convicted of treason (e.g. holding classified documents and parading them around to others) he can be barred from running for a presidential candidacy, or rather excluded from becoming President of the USA. Just lying, loudmouthing and screwing around - aka cheating on his wife can't prevent him from being elected as President.
He isnt being charged with treason. :cuckoo:
 
He isnt being charged with treason. :cuckoo:
Not yet.

Posted by Votto:
This is the entire crux of the Trump indictment. They have Trump on tape saying his documents were classified and talking about them to some friends.
All Trump had to do was say they were not classified and everything would be OK, but they have him on tape saying they were classified, therefore, he should not have had them and certainly should not have been talking about them.
So the left goes after him with the Espionage Act created by President Wilson.
 
Last edited:
Trump will NEVER be sent to jail over this, even though leftists are having wet dreams over it, and here’s why:

The majority of people in this country are still basically decent. They recognize the wrong in using the power of the government to go after one’s #1 political opponent - ESPECIALLY when the one on the attack is guilty of much worse, and in his case, it’s suppressed or wiped under the rug.

Are there a vocal minority who will make excuses for and deny the obvious bribery scheme Biden was part of - while condemning his opponent for much less serious actions? Of course, and we see some of them posting here.

But MOST people recognize injustice and are appalled that our government is advancing it against political enemies.
 
Trump will NEVER be sent to jail over this, even though leftists are having wet dreams over it, and here’s why:

The majority of people in this country are still basically decent. They recognize the wrong in using the power of the government to go after one’s #1 political opponent - ESPECIALLY when the one on the attack is guilty of much worse, and in his case, it’s suppressed or wiped under the rug.

Are there a vocal minority who will make excuses for and deny the obvious bribery scheme Biden was part of - while condemning his opponent for much less serious actions? Of course, and we see some of them posting here.

But MOST people recognize injustice and are appalled that our government is advancing it against political enemies.
Stop electing criminals.
 
Stop electing criminals.
Wow. Can we say…..projection?

The criminal is the one who took $5 million for himself and $5 billion for Hunter, and then followed the instructions outlined on the FBI document that Wray was stonewalling on as to how to set up multiple shell companies to launder the money to various Biden family members.
 
Wow. Can we say…..projection?

The criminal is the one who took $5 million for himself and $5 billion for Hunter, and then followed the instructions outlined on the FBI document that Wray was stonewalling on as to how to set up multiple shell companies to launder the money to various Biden family members.
If true, that would make both of them criminals. Which criminal did you vote for?
 
If true, that would make both of them criminals. Which criminal did you vote for?

It's an ignorant lie. Take some time to look at the details. US foreign policy backed by the UN and EU called for removing Shokin because he wouldn't prosecute corruption .. The objective was to clean up Ukraine's reputation so they could attract much needed foreign investment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top