Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump can short-circuit any ugliness by pleading guilty, paying the fines, and then getting back to running.The question isn't really what a verdict would be. Democrats have gone too far to risk a verdict. Will there be a plea or an assassination? A political strike against one of the Trump children would send a profound message.
He will have to agree to not appeal being barred forever from holding office.Trump can short-circuit any ugliness by pleading guilty, paying the fines, and then getting back to running.
If he wins fine, if he loses, fine.
Bullshit. Paying the fine is the penalty. Then the slate is clean. To bar Trump from politics is the very definition of "election interference". No deal,He will have to agree to not appeal being barred forever from holding office.
It's the law. Major felonies bar people from office.Bullshit. Paying the fine is the penalty. Then the slate is clean. To bar Trump from politics is the very definition of "election interference". No deal,
Major felonies? Hint: The Presidential Records Act isn't a criminal statute.It's the law. Major felonies bar people from office.
You better like Judge Jack Smith in on the secret then. kyzr, you are just loony.Major felonies? Hint: The Presidential Records Act isn't a criminal statute.
Taking a bribe or selling influence should be a major felony, huh?
Ah the deep bullshit keeps rising. Take your Stalinist show trails and shove up your collective asses.I've been listening to various legal experts on CNN and MSNBC talk about how strong and tight the Jack Smith indictment is. Many of them think Trump should seriously consider a plea deal - if one is offered. I think a plea would be better for Trump - but I'd rather see a trial. What do you think?
Read the full indictment here.
Wouldn’t a conviction preclude him running?Politcally speaking that would be a terrible inclusion in any plea deal.
Once the ink is dry and and the FPOTUS walks, then the claim would be that the who process wasn't about upholding the law, that it was all about keeping Trump off the 2024 ballot.
Therefore, IMHO, if a plea deal is reached - it should NOT include any provision concerning holding Federal office.
WW
All the more reason to lock his ass up and throw away the keyBullshit. He should just pay the fines and get back to running.
Enjoy your wet dreams.Trump faces up to 20 years in prison
Wouldn’t a conviction preclude him running?
I didn’t vote because what you or I believe to be prudent is not what he’ll do.I've been listening to various legal experts on CNN and MSNBC talk about how strong and tight the Jack Smith indictment is. Many of them think Trump should seriously consider a plea deal - if one is offered. I think a plea would be better for Trump - but I'd rather see a trial. What do you think?
Read the full indictment here.
Of course because they were so obviously wrong about Trump being indicted.If they are on CNN and MSNBC, they cannot possibly be legal experts.
There are laws, however, that can preclude him from ever running for any office again.No.
The qualifications to run are in the Constitution. It didn’t say you can’t run if you are a criminal.
WW
The Judge can indeed bar Trump from ever running for office again if convicted.No.
The qualifications to run are in the Constitution. It didn’t say you can’t run if you are a criminal.
WW
I've been listening to various legal experts on CNN and MSNBC talk about how strong and tight the Jack Smith indictment is. Many of them think Trump should seriously consider a plea deal - if one is offered. I think a plea would be better for Trump - but I'd rather see a trial. What do you think?
Read the full indictment here.
