Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already done, moron.
Please try to keep up.
So you can't explain why you included the last 4 words.
Got it.![]()
Already done.
Now, tell us what grounds the Supreme Court would overturn the NY State ruling?
You've never been able to answer that. Is it your imaginary '6th amendment violation' because the prosecution never revealed the underlying crime?
They did. Twice. You lied your ass off.
Is it 'unanimity'?
The verdict was unanimous. TWICE.
You've simply got nothing.
Explain the last 4 words, Simp.
This will be a hoot.![]()
Multiple choice crimes from the judge isn't how our system works, Dumbass.
This kangaroo court will get bitchslapped on appeal. And I will laugh at your dumbassery and hackery when it does,
I'll ask you again...........please list all the cases the SC has taken up where there wasn't a unanimous verdict in the lower court.![]()
No shit. You are finally catching on. He was only accused of falsifying records because his accountant entered a legal expense as a legal expense years after the election. No other crime was accused or proven with evidence at trial that resurrected those dead misdemeanors.LOL
Dumbfuck, Trump wasn't accused of committing multiple different crimes.
![]()
Laughing.....so now you're abandoning Turley's argument that the Supreme Court would intervene because they consider unanimous rulings sacrosanct?
Even YOU ignore Turley's legal predictions.
Sorry, kiddo.....but the NY verdict was unanimous. Twice.
You've got nothing.
Link us up to the evidence Fat Alvin produced during the trial for these 3 multiple choice crimes.
Post it here.
It's fun to watch you lie constantly, and ignore the links I provided that gave you the answer to you question back on page 1.This isn't going away Nostra . Everytime you run, you lose.
On what basis would the Supreme Court overturn this case?
Be specific. None of your links have offered a credible reason. And you certainly have no idea what you're talking about.
So, no crimes by Trump.The three crimes were Pecker paying $30K to a doorman. Paying McDougal $250K. And Cohen paying Daniels $130K.
The evidence presented came from Pecker, Cohen, McDougal & Daniels.
Trump's not gonna win an appeal just because of your abject ignorance of this case.
Not according to the jury instructions. Try harder.
The three crimes were Pecker paying $30K to a doorman. Paying McDougal $250K. And Cohen paying Daniels $130K.
The evidence presented came from Pecker, Cohen, McDougal & Daniels.
Trump's not gonna win an appeal just because of your abject ignorance of this case.