Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,312
- 15,517
Laughing.....look at it run! It claimed that the proseuction never revealed the underlying crimes. And when that was proven a silly, hapless little lie, it tries to change the subject.Explain how a bookkeeping entry done years after the election was a conspiracy to promote or prevent the election of any person?
This is fun.
You keep jumping on rakes and bashing yourself in the face.![]()
But tell me again how the prosecution never revealed the underlying crime, in violation of the 6th amendment, despite that crime laid out in the jury instructions
Laughing....I know more than you, Nostra. I research. You just spam links to articles you've never read. Our sources are not equal.