Poor poor liberal gun grabbers.

[danielpalos]

You seem to be missing the point. I am claiming you are full of fallacy, simply Because you don't post your alleged good argument, each and every time this issue is contested, until you give up your contention, due to a simple exhaustion of any clue and any Cause you could come up with.

Which faulty logic is that? There is no willful appeal to ignorance of the Intent and Purpose of any law.

Your faulty logic has been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Dude, there is no willful appeal to ignorance of the law as codified at 10US311. You have no refutation, as your current appeals to nothing but fallacy, indicate.

There has not once been any appeal to any kind of ignorance of 10 USC 311.

You have not, and cannot demonstrate any fallacy I have employed. You certainly would have done so by now if it were possible for you.

You are just wrong, for all the reasons clearly posted for you previously. AGAIN. STILL.

Your errors of fact and your faulty logic have been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Yes there has, since not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[LOki]

You seem to be missing the point. I am claiming you are full of fallacy, simply Because you don't post your alleged good argument, each and every time this issue is contested, until you give up your contention, due to a simple exhaustion of any clue and any Cause you could come up with.

Which faulty logic is that? There is no willful appeal to ignorance of the Intent and Purpose of any law.

Your faulty logic has been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Dude, there is no willful appeal to ignorance of the law as codified at 10US311. You have no refutation, as your current appeals to nothing but fallacy, indicate.

There has not once been any appeal to any kind of ignorance of 10 USC 311.

You have not, and cannot demonstrate any fallacy I have employed. You certainly would have done so by now if it were possible for you.

You are just wrong, for all the reasons clearly posted for you previously. AGAIN. STILL.

Your errors of fact and your faulty logic have been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Yes there has, since not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This has been previously addressed. Your fatuous point was refuted decisively. You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

You seem to be missing the point. I am claiming you are full of fallacy, simply Because you don't post your alleged good argument, each and every time this issue is contested, until you give up your contention, due to a simple exhaustion of any clue and any Cause you could come up with.

Which faulty logic is that? There is no willful appeal to ignorance of the Intent and Purpose of any law.

Your faulty logic has been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Dude, there is no willful appeal to ignorance of the law as codified at 10US311. You have no refutation, as your current appeals to nothing but fallacy, indicate.

There has not once been any appeal to any kind of ignorance of 10 USC 311.

You have not, and cannot demonstrate any fallacy I have employed. You certainly would have done so by now if it were possible for you.

You are just wrong, for all the reasons clearly posted for you previously. AGAIN. STILL.

Your errors of fact and your faulty logic have been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Yes there has, since not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This has been previously addressed. Your fatuous point was refuted decisively. You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws; simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

 

[LOki]

Your faulty logic has been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Dude, there is no willful appeal to ignorance of the law as codified at 10US311. You have no refutation, as your current appeals to nothing but fallacy, indicate.

There has not once been any appeal to any kind of ignorance of 10 USC 311.

You have not, and cannot demonstrate any fallacy I have employed. You certainly would have done so by now if it were possible for you.

You are just wrong, for all the reasons clearly posted for you previously. AGAIN. STILL.

Your errors of fact and your faulty logic have been identified for you, described for you, and then refuted and rebutted directly and decisively several times.

You have not once contested any argument or rebuttal with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.

You simply repeat your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality as a response to every direct and decisive rebuttal of your nonsense.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Yes there has, since not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This has been previously addressed. Your fatuous point was refuted decisively. You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws; simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

This has been previously addressed. Your fatuous point was refuted decisively. You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it hasn't or I would not be asking you; You either have a valid or you are just full of fallacy.

 

[LOki]

No, it hasn't or I would not be asking you; You either have a valid or you are just full of fallacy.

Your fatuous point was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Until then:

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

 

[LOki]

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Until then:

AGAIN. STILL.

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

Yes. You have made this argument before. I addressed it directly. Several times.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time. Repetition of your unsupported and discredited notions will continue to be affirmation of your capitulation, and judged to be just another expression of your stupid and boring habit.

Until then:

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Until then:

AGAIN. STILL.

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

Yes. You have made this argument before. I addressed it directly. Several times.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time. Repetition of your unsupported and discredited notions will continue to be affirmation of your capitulation, and judged to be just another expression of your stupid and boring habit.

Until then:

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

dude, you are just full of fallacy if you don't advance a valid rebuttal with supporting argument, each and every time this issue is contested.

In any Case, non-sequiturs, which are usually considered fallacies, are considered non-responsive in legal venues. You would have lost already in a real legal venue, due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

So, go ahead and be useless for your team.

 

[LOki]

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Until then:

AGAIN. STILL.

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground:

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

You only claim that; but have no valid argument to show for it, like usual.

There is no willful appeal to ignorance any Militia laws (i.e. 10USC311); simply because our Second Amendment expressly declares and terms, what is necessary to the security of a free State.

You are welcome to try to achieve any "concentration of intellectual superiority", if you are able; but, that requires a valid argument--so, you may only be as useful as JEB Stuart at Gettysburg.

Yes. You have made this argument before. I addressed it directly. Several times.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions. You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Repetition of your unsupported and discredited notions will continue to be affirmation of your capitulation, and judged to be just another expression of your stupid and boring habit.

Until then:

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

dude, you are just full of fallacy if you don't advance a valid rebuttal with supporting argument, each and every time this issue is contested.

Nonsense.

This fatuous point of yours was refuted decisively. Several times, with several arguments.

You could not bring a cogent defense using valid logic applied to the verifiable facts of reality. You just repeated your unsupported and discredited notions.

There is no requirement or obligation to refute them again.

You were wrong then, just as you are now. AGAIN. STILL.

You could attempt a cogent rebuttal to the refutations previously submitted. I have no apprehension that you will even try. If you did, it would be the very first time.

Repetition of your unsupported and discredited notions will continue to be affirmation of your capitulation, and judged to be just another expression of your stupid and boring habit.

In any Case, non-sequiturs, which are usually considered fallacies, are considered non-responsive in legal venues. You would have lost already in a real legal venue, due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

So, go ahead and be useless for your team.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy for your Cause, like usual.

dudes and Esquires, after thrice, non responsiveness in legal venues should be considered, just a vice.

 

[LOki]

Nothing but fallacy for your Cause, like usual.

dudes and Esquires, after thrice, non responsiveness in legal venues should be considered, just a vice.

Repetition of your obvious errors of fact, your own faulty logic, your intentionally cultivated ignorance, and your mendacious denials of reality have lead you, predictably, once more to your place of shame.

You have had ample opportunity to bring valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality to defend the rebuttals brought against your dopey assertions.

Indicted by your own criteria;

You are boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

Still nothing but fallacy for your Cause; i got it.

 

[LOki]

Still nothing but fallacy for your Cause; i got it.

You've got nothing but boring and stupid. AGAIN. STILL.

 

[danielpalos]

What?! Are you even alleging to be contesting my argument? Are you really really serious this time

Here it is again for your ease and convenience; as that form of argumentation high ground, simply Because, Only those who are full of fallacy, are too inferior to carry that argumentation high ground, each and every time they make the attempt, without any Thing in support, but fallacy.

Not all of the Militia of the United States is well regulated.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Why do you believe 10USC311 does not apply or is irrelevant?

 

[Gunman]

How dumb can you be 98% of American are not in the Militia ... 75% of those folks own Guns .. AND .. they
ARE NOT going to give them up just because some azzhole in congress don't like guns... The reason for a well
Regulated Militia was back then when you were in the Militia you took your gun Home with you every night... and you kept your gun when you got out... Some Country's still do that today... BUT not the USA.... STUPID ....

 

[danielpalos]

How dumb can you be 98% of American are not in the Militia ... 75% of those folks own Guns .. AND .. they
ARE NOT going to give them up just because some azzhole in congress don't like guns... The reason for a well
Regulated Militia was back then when you were in the Militia you took your gun Home with you every night... and you kept your gun when you got out... Some Country's still do that today... BUT not the USA.... STUPID ....

Why do you believe 10USC311 does not apply or is irrelevant?

Only gun lovers believe "fire-base fallacy" is tenable.

 

[WinterBorn]

How dumb can you be 98% of American are not in the Militia ... 75% of those folks own Guns .. AND .. they
ARE NOT going to give them up just because some azzhole in congress don't like guns... The reason for a well
Regulated Militia was back then when you were in the Militia you took your gun Home with you every night... and you kept your gun when you got out... Some Country's still do that today... BUT not the USA.... STUPID ....

Why do you believe 10USC311 does not apply or is irrelevant?

Only gun lovers believe "fire-base fallacy" is tenable.

It is not relevant because the US Code cannot override the US Constitution, which has repeatedly been ruled to preserve an individual right to keep and bear arms. It is ignorance to argue otherwise.

 

[danielpalos]

How dumb can you be 98% of American are not in the Militia ... 75% of those folks own Guns .. AND .. they
ARE NOT going to give them up just because some azzhole in congress don't like guns... The reason for a well
Regulated Militia was back then when you were in the Militia you took your gun Home with you every night... and you kept your gun when you got out... Some Country's still do that today... BUT not the USA.... STUPID ....

Why do you believe 10USC311 does not apply or is irrelevant?

Only gun lovers believe "fire-base fallacy" is tenable.

It is not relevant because the US Code cannot override the US Constitution, which has repeatedly been ruled to preserve an individual right to keep and bear arms. It is ignorance to argue otherwise.

Where is this Individual right to be found? The People is a collective Term not an Individual Term, as is the Term Militia; there is no Appeal to Ignorance of our own laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

How dumb can you be 98% of American are not in the Militia ... 75% of those folks own Guns .. AND .. they
ARE NOT going to give them up just because some azzhole in congress don't like guns... The reason for a well
Regulated Militia was back then when you were in the Militia you took your gun Home with you every night... and you kept your gun when you got out... Some Country's still do that today... BUT not the USA.... STUPID ....

Why do you believe 10USC311 does not apply or is irrelevant?

Only gun lovers believe "fire-base fallacy" is tenable.

It is not relevant because the US Code cannot override the US Constitution, which has repeatedly been ruled to preserve an individual right to keep and bear arms. It is ignorance to argue otherwise.

Where is this Individual right to be found? The People is a collective Term not an Individual Term, as is the Term Militia; there is no Appeal to Ignorance of our own laws.

You also said that this grammar rule is irrelevant in the other amendments which use the phrase "the people".

But "the people" means just that, the people or the citizens. That is what the SCOTUS has ruled and what the other writings of the founding fathers show that they believed.