HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
The investigation is not over, and the FBI has not - according to them - revealed all they have. To make a decision before the investigation is over is unethical / wrong. To endorse a suspect being investigated for crimes under the espionage act is unethican and a massive conflict of interest....yet history-making.You're too stupid to convince. You might as well be demanding someone convince you that water is wet.The only one babbling is you, BD, because your ignorance has been exposed about your moronic claim about Obama & Lynch having no control over the FBI and your refusal to acknowledge Obama's new Presidential 1st!Right wingers usually start babbling about a wide range of conspiracy theories when they are tied down to their bullshit like I just did. Decide on a subject before you just start spouting random rush quotes.
Lying, denying, and justifying....and as a last resort: "Buuuuussshhhhh!" That's all libs have to answer with.
Be proud - Obama set a new record....embrace it, celebrate it....unless you're too embarassed by it. (You should be...)
Convince me. Give me anything legitimate to make me believe Obama has that control over the FBI. Silly Alex Jones theories won't work.
If realizing Obama hired Lynch and Lynch is over the FBI...that the FBI presents evidence to the DOJ & the DOJ - Lynch - is then the only person who can have Hillary indicted....that both the DOJ and FBI work for the President of the United States doesn't convince you nothing will ever do it.
As John Wayne said, 'Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.'
It's unlikely Obama would have backed Hillary knowing the FBI was going to indict her. If anybody knows their intentions it would be their boss.
They better hurry up. It won't make any difference what they do if she is elected. If accused of something serious the ball would be in the House's court for a possible impeachment. It would be out of the FBI's and the Justice Department's hands at that point.