Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 75,573
- 72,489
- 3,615
Lol, it's hilarious when a tRumkin calls someone else a parrot.how you figure? you're just a parrot right now. Comey told him he wasn't under investigation. Comey stated so under oath. oops. There is also a letter by Rosenstein recommending to fire the dope.Authority or no directing the closure of a federal investigation into himself is obstructing justice. It's the intent that matters.It's an interesting theory, I don't see it happening though. As far a obstruction goes, the only way I can see a president could be charged for obstruction, after impeachment and removal or resignation, would be for destruction of evidence. It won't fly if he simply exercises his Article 2 authority to direct federal law enforcement the way he sees fit. Nixon could have been charged for obstruction after he resigned, for destruction of evidence.
.
You probably can't even see the irony in what you just said can you?