Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sessions stated he would recuse himself from "anything" that had to do with the investigation. The "memo" he signed, contained the statement from Trump, "...I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..."bit of a stretch there, bildo
Copy of his letter.
FBI Director James B. Comey's termination: Letters from the White House, Attorney General
PROVE the recusal had anything to do with the Russian investigation.
Care to give me examples of "bar lowering"?You guys lowered that bar for the past 3 decades, don't complain about going under it now.
It wasn't a strawman; it was a rhetorical statement requiring no answer./---- A straw man argument. Pres Trump is not destroying our Republic. ( A democracy is mob rule where 51% can take away the rights of the 49%)
View attachment 126241
Sessions stated he would recuse himself from "anything" that had to do with the investigation. The "memo" he signed, contained the statement from Trump, "...I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..."bit of a stretch there, bildo
Copy of his letter.
FBI Director James B. Comey's termination: Letters from the White House, Attorney General
PROVE the recusal had anything to do with the Russian investigation.
That one statement has to do with the investigation Sessions said he would recuse himself from. He did not. He did not recuse himself. He lied.
So far, he has.Sessions stated he would recuse himself from "anything" that had to do with the investigation.
"...I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation..."
I don't know when. I just have that same feeling I had back in 1973.By when ?
And what bet would you like to make regarding that date ?
He was leading the investigation, that makes him part of the investigation.Comey was not the investigation
You're funnier than the guy in your pictureHe was leading the investigation, that makes him part of the investigation.Comey was not the investigation
If he had committed murder,He was leading the investigation, that makes him part of the investigation.Comey was not the investigation
That is a completely different issue. That is someone committing a crime, not leading an investigation. Comey did not commit any crime. The "memo" Sessions signed, did not claim Comey committed any crime. Therefore, neither should your hypothetical.If he had committed murder,
if he had been caught selling Classified Information
if he had done any of a hundred other illegal things,
Would Sessions still have had to recuse himself?
Well, doggy...You're funnier than the guy in your picture
That is a completely different issue. That is someone committing a crime, not leading an investigation. Comey did not commit any crime. The "memo" Sessions signed, did not claim Comey committed any crime. Therefore, neither should your hypothetical.If he had committed murder,
if he had been caught selling Classified Information
if he had done any of a hundred other illegal things,
Would Sessions still have had to recuse himself?
And his job is supposed to have nothing to do with that investigation.you miss the point, as usual.
He recused himself from the Russian collusion investigation, not from doing his job
it didn'tAnd his job is supposed to have nothing to do with that investigation.you miss the point, as usual.
He recused himself from the Russian collusion investigation, not from doing his job
Of coarse he did.it didn't
or, do you have proof it did?
Of coarse he did.it didn't
or, do you have proof it did?
He played a role in the firing of the leader of that investigation.
I don't like Trump, but I can't watch much of it either. It's literally non-stop now, and the press is making zero (0) effort to hide its agenda.I don't watch trash media. Nor do I post about them. I occasionally flip through the channels but that's it.Does anyone have a problem with this???
I don't think Trump is attacking them. They just can't handle criticism. Trump just wants to do his job without having to deal with a violently disruptive press. The best thing for the country would be to shut them down for 90 days for a cooling off period. They are becoming more of a problem than Islamic Terrorists.I don't like Trump, but I can't watch much of it either. It's literally non-stop now, and the press is making zero (0) effort to hide its agenda.I don't watch trash media. Nor do I post about them. I occasionally flip through the channels but that's it.Does anyone have a problem with this???
To be fair, Trump has been triggering them non-stop. But I think his miscalculation has been that his attacks on them would get them to change. No, not even close. His attacks have only animated and energized them.
I have no doubt that the more casual consumers of news and politics are being swayed by the 24/7 attacks on him, and that should worry the Republicans.
.
When a President of the United States calls the American media "the enemy of the people" and constantly says/tweets mocking/negative things about it - well, we don't have to call those "attacks", we can call them "saxophones" if you want. But the media is going to aggressively react, and they are.I don't think Trump is attacking them. They just can't handle criticism. Trump just wants to do his job without having to deal with a violently disruptive press. The best thing for the country would be to shut them down for 90 days for a cooling off period. They are becoming more of a problem than Islamic Terrorists.I don't like Trump, but I can't watch much of it either. It's literally non-stop now, and the press is making zero (0) effort to hide its agenda.I don't watch trash media. Nor do I post about them. I occasionally flip through the channels but that's it.Does anyone have a problem with this???
To be fair, Trump has been triggering them non-stop. But I think his miscalculation has been that his attacks on them would get them to change. No, not even close. His attacks have only animated and energized them.
I have no doubt that the more casual consumers of news and politics are being swayed by the 24/7 attacks on him, and that should worry the Republicans.
.
The press is livid that they didn't get to install their candidate. I've said for decades they are the fourth branch of government, deciding the course of the country.I don't think Trump is attacking them. They just can't handle criticism. Trump just wants to do his job without having to deal with a violently disruptive press. The best thing for the country would be to shut them down for 90 days for a cooling off period. They are becoming more of a problem than Islamic Terrorists.I don't like Trump, but I can't watch much of it either. It's literally non-stop now, and the press is making zero (0) effort to hide its agenda.I don't watch trash media. Nor do I post about them. I occasionally flip through the channels but that's it.Does anyone have a problem with this???
To be fair, Trump has been triggering them non-stop. But I think his miscalculation has been that his attacks on them would get them to change. No, not even close. His attacks have only animated and energized them.
I have no doubt that the more casual consumers of news and politics are being swayed by the 24/7 attacks on him, and that should worry the Republicans.
.