Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Moreover,
Reductio ad Hitlerum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I didn't post it earlier because I thought you may simply have been attempting to make an analogy, but your agenda is vividly clear now.
Step away from the wiki.
I suspect you type shit on wiki, then come here and link it as "evidence". It's not a good source for any except UNCONTESTED information...
I ignored that the first time because it was just too pathetic for words.
Yes, I know you copied the references as if that somehow proves something. All it proves is that you can cut & paste.
I thought about cutting and pasting the references I used about the holocaust/pro-abortion similiarities but figured it would just go over your head.
And the fact that you're back with the same drivel, after (stupidly) making fun of MY sources, shows I was right.
I'm still waiting for anybody to post something that shows how Pro-Lifers employ the same rhetoric to the same end as Nazis.
I have proven that pro-abortionists use the same arguments to justify killing.
Now please support your statements that pro-lifers do exactly the same.
You haven't proven anything of the sort. You've taken bullshit from anti-abortion websites any historian would find laughable.
Abortion was illegal in Nazi Germany. They even executed people for performing them.
You claims would hold water if we were forcing abortions on people, which no one is. Abortion is a choice.
I'm still waiting for anybody to post something that shows how Pro-Lifers employ the same rhetoric to the same end as Nazis.
I have proven that pro-abortionists use the same arguments to justify killing.
Now please support your statements that pro-lifers do exactly the same.
You haven't proven anything of the sort. You've taken bullshit from anti-abortion websites any historian would find laughable.
Abortion was illegal in Nazi Germany. They even executed people for performing them.
You claims would hold water if we were forcing abortions on people, which no one is. Abortion is a choice.
I'm still waiting for anybody to post something that shows how Pro-Lifers employ the same rhetoric to the same end as Nazis.
I have proven that pro-abortionists use the same arguments to justify killing.
Now please support your statements that pro-lifers do exactly the same.
You haven't proven anything of the sort. You've taken bullshit from anti-abortion websites any historian would find laughable.
Abortion was illegal in Nazi Germany. They even executed people for performing them.
You claims would hold water if we were forcing abortions on people, which no one is. Abortion is a choice.
Again, maybe it was stated in past posts....
Did she make a claim on forced abortions ?
...or Did she make a claim on the practice of passive eugenics?
Hmm,
so advocates of abortion never used the concepts of eugenics to justify their support ?
Hmm,
so advocates of abortion never used the concepts of eugenics to justify their support ?
For the most part, no.
it's usually pitched as
1) Women well get them anyway, so they should be safe.
2) It's really none of the government's business... or yours.
Now, true, in other countries, they are passed off as population control, or worse, for sex selection in countries where boys are valued more than girls.
For the most part, people, not that you can blame them, don't like to speak that way.
But to be fair,
if her point was that some founders of Planned Parenthood used eugenics to justify
their position, that would be true
For the most part, people, not that you can blame them, don't like to speak that way.
But to be fair,
if her point was that some founders of Planned Parenthood used eugenics to justify
their position, that would be true
Except that the founders of planned parenthood (particularly Sanger when she wasn't appearing in doctored photographs or making quotes she didn't say) didn't believe in Abortion. in the 1920's abortions were damned dangerous.
It is also illogical to compare Nazism, which was based on no science whatsoever, with Eugenics, which was based on faulty and incomplete science.
For the most part, people, not that you can blame them, don't like to speak that way.
But to be fair,
if her point was that some founders of Planned Parenthood used eugenics to justify
their position, that would be true
Except that the founders of planned parenthood (particularly Sanger when she wasn't appearing in doctored photographs or making quotes she didn't say) didn't believe in Abortion. in the 1920's abortions were damned dangerous.
It is also illogical to compare Nazism, which was based on no science whatsoever, with Eugenics, which was based on faulty and incomplete science.
you can practice eugenics without abortion
Except that the founders of planned parenthood (particularly Sanger when she wasn't appearing in doctored photographs or making quotes she didn't say) didn't believe in Abortion. in the 1920's abortions were damned dangerous.
It is also illogical to compare Nazism, which was based on no science whatsoever, with Eugenics, which was based on faulty and incomplete science.
you can practice eugenics without abortion
And most of us do.
That's why you always want to have sex with the babe of the hunk instead of the geeky nerd. It's almost like - I don't know, nature. The most desirable traits breed.
On a more serious note, yes, we do practice eugenics. For instance, women are advised against having babies after a certain age because of increased possibility of diseases like Down Syndrome. Ethnicities with higher percentages of diseases like Tay-Sachs go through genetic screenings to avoid it.
I'm not seeing this as bad, I'm seeing it as prudent.