Pro-Abortion Cult Extremists Just Proved They Are Terrorists

[TemplarKormac]

Yes you probably do think other people's rights should be put up for a vote.

Uh yeah, that's what we call 'democracy.'

Go look that up, if you're capable.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Yes you probably do think other people's rights should be put up for a vote.

There is no "right": to take the life of another except in defense of yourself or others.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

On THIS we can certainly agree. At this point, it is guaranteed, even if Roberts manages to intimidate one of the five on record.

There's no possibility Robert would do so, in fact I'm all but certain he'll be voting in the majority. I don't think a majority could have been reached without an affirmative vote by Roberts.

 

[Esdraelon]

Yes you probably do think other people's rights should be put up for a vote.

Prior to nine old white men ruling against the Constitution in '73, this "right" didn't exist at the Federal level. The only way bans in some states will remain is if the majority CHOOSE politicians that will support that outcome. Whatever happened to the Democrats screeching over "democracy" being in jeopardy?

We all know your whole party is all about "whatever it takes" to get your way - EVERY TIME - the rest of the people be damned. Well, it looks like this time around, you might LOSE. Get ready to deal with it. If you stay true to form you will support widespread violence to demand your way and it will almost certainly lead to even bigger electoral costs this November.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Prior to nine old white men ruling against the Constitution in '73, this "right" didn't exist at the Federal level. The only way bans in some states will remain is if the majority CHOOSE politicians that will support that outcome. Whatever happened to the Democrats screeching over "democracy" being in jeopardy?

We all know your whole party is all about "whatever it takes" to get your way - EVERY TIME - the rest of the people be damned. Well, it looks like this time around, you might LOSE. Get ready to deal with it. If you stay true to form you will support widespread violence to demand your way and it will almost certainly lead to even bigger electoral costs this November.

It didn't exist at the state level either. No state's constitution includes a right to abortion.

 

[occupied]

You seem to think that the right to life should be eliminated by court mandate.

I'll take democracy over that any day.

No you wouldn't. If your rights were put up for a vote by a hostile electorate you would cry like anyone else. That's why questions concerning American's rights have traditionally been decided by a supposedly non-partisan judiciary theoretically beyond the reach of politics.

 

[iceberg]

Actually they do, they see such moves as opportunities to sow even more discord and to further more violence.

the never consider it in the same light or respect they demand it.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

No you wouldn't. If your rights were put up for a vote by a hostile electorate you would cry like anyone else. That's why questions concerning American's rights have traditionally been decided by a supposedly non-partisan judiciary theoretically beyond the reach of politics.

There is no "right" to take the life of another except in defense of self or others.

 

[iceberg]

Was I talking to you? All anyone ever had to do on this issue was to mind their own damned business.

name a progressive that does that.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

supposedly non-partisan judiciary

No such thing has ever existed in this country since political parties were first formed.

You don't want non partisan jurists nor do democrats which is proven during every confirmation hearing.

 

[occupied]

There is no "right" to take the life of another except in defense of self or others.

If there is no right to abortion then there is no right to a lot of other things either. This argument is about to be used against a wide range of things concerning equal rights and equal protection.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

If there is no right to abortion then there is no right to a lot of other things either. This argument is about to be used against a wide range of things concerning equal rights and equal protection.

If that's true, those things will be sorted out over time.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Probably not the smartest move in a church full of Mexican Catholics.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

She came charging up the stairs at him, she's got no right to bitch.

 

[TemplarKormac]

If there is no right to abortion then there is no right to a lot of other things either.

The catch here is that the right to abortion will still exist, just not for the sake of personal convenience but for medical necessity.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

The catch here is that the right to abortion will still exist, just not for the sake of personal convenience but for medical necessity.

It's not a "right", never was.

There is no right to take the life of another except in defense of self or others.

 

[Esdraelon]

By the same argument I could ask you how many unwanted babies you have adopted?

Actually, my daughter was born in Beijing and left at the "Beijing Children's Welfare Institute". She was six when we adopted her. However, your premise is based on demanding that others take responsibility for the actions of men and women who don't even TRY to use contraception. MOST abortions are about convenience and they amount to retroactive "birth control". Anyone who supports that is evil, IMO.

You lied for years about "safe, legal, and RARE". Today you proudly demand "anywhere, anytime, any situation - including late-term. It should be up to the population of the states to determine which of those scenarios is acceptable. Far from being an overreach by Red states, it's YOUR party that demands the obedience of everyone to their sick ideologies. Looks like you WILL be resisted now. No backing up, and no apologies.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Actually, my daughter was born in Beijing and left at the "Beijing Children's Welfare Institute". She was six when we adopted her. However, your premise is based on demanding that others take responsibility for the actions of men and women who don't even TRY to use contraception. MOST abortions are about convenience and they amount to retroactive "birth control". Anyone who supports that is evil, IMO.

You lied for years about "safe, legal, and RARE". Today you proudly demand "anywhere, anytime, any situation - including late-term. It should be up to the population of the states to determine which of those scenarios is acceptable. Far from being an overreach by Red states, it's YOUR party that demands the obedience of everyone to their sick ideologies. Looks like you WILL be resisted now. No backing up, and no apologies.

They totally dismiss the premise of personal responsibility.