Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 99,065
- 77,182
- 3,645
And calling a fetus a baby eases yours.Exactly. Saying it is not a baby eases their conscience....the point is they don't care it's a baby, they still want to do it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And calling a fetus a baby eases yours.Exactly. Saying it is not a baby eases their conscience....the point is they don't care it's a baby, they still want to do it.
Liberals see their fetishes and superstitions as the " exception " to every rule....just because.Then why do you find it to be the duty of the rest of us pay up for other peoples' poor choices?Then make that choice for yourself. It's not the duty of the world to cater to your fetishes and superstitions.The choice should be, if you don't want a baby don't engage in sex ---- simple choice.Yes the choice should be the mothers to make. If you dont want an abortion dont have one.
That doesn't apply. Allwoing people to choose for themselves is precisely the opposite of enforcing any one superstition or fetish.Liberals see their fetishes and superstitions as the " exception " to every rule....just because.Then why do you find it to be the duty of the rest of us pay up for other peoples' poor choices?Then make that choice for yourself. It's not the duty of the world to cater to your fetishes and superstitions.The choice should be, if you don't want a baby don't engage in sex ---- simple choice.Yes the choice should be the mothers to make. If you dont want an abortion dont have one.
You are trying to force people to fund it. If you are going to chose to kill babies...do it on your own dime and own it.That doesn't apply. Allwoing people to choose for themselves is precisely the opposite of enforcing any one superstition or fetish.Liberals see their fetishes and superstitions as the " exception " to every rule....just because.Then why do you find it to be the duty of the rest of us pay up for other peoples' poor choices?Then make that choice for yourself. It's not the duty of the world to cater to your fetishes and superstitions.The choice should be, if you don't want a baby don't engage in sex ---- simple choice.Yes the choice should be the mothers to make. If you dont want an abortion dont have one.
Yeah, in a way I am, as I believe it should be a covered event, and i believe we should have universal healthcare. So there is some accuracy to what you say. I don't find your authoritative declarations of morality very convincing, personally. And, even if I did, I still don't think I should get to choose for others.You are trying to force people to fund it.
Having an abortion is definitely dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions...no matter how unpleasant having an abortion is.Who told you she lost that choice when she chose to have sex? God himself performed abortions.
You mistake me for someone who believes in Religion. I don’t.
True Morality expects us to deal with the consequences of our choices and decisions. No matter how unpleasant they may be.
You are trying to force people to fund wars. If you chose to fight someone....do it on your own dime and own it.You are trying to force people to fund it. If you are going to chose to kill babies...do it on your own dime and own it.That doesn't apply. Allwoing people to choose for themselves is precisely the opposite of enforcing any one superstition or fetish.Liberals see their fetishes and superstitions as the " exception " to every rule....just because.Then why do you find it to be the duty of the rest of us pay up for other peoples' poor choices?Then make that choice for yourself. It's not the duty of the world to cater to your fetishes and superstitions.The choice should be, if you don't want a baby don't engage in sex ---- simple choice.
Having an abortion is definitely dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.
Nope. Thats dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.Having an abortion is definitely dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.
No. That is AVOIDING the consequences of those decisions.
Nope. Thats dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.
Sounds like you have this all well thought out for yourself. Is there a compelling reason your personal feelings should become the law of the land?Nope. Thats dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.
Only if you mistakenly believe the consequence of sex is regnabcy. It’s not. The consequence of sex is PARENTHOOD.
Sounds like you have this all well thought out for yourself. Is there a compelling reason your personal feelings should become the law of the land?
Sex has many consequences. If you catch an STD you dont just sit there and leave it untreated. You take care of it. Just like if you are not prepared to be a parent.Nope. Thats dealing with the consequences of choices and decisions.
Only if you mistakenly believe the consequence of sex is pregnancy. It’s not. The consequence of sex is PARENTHOOD.
So they are those of other people. Good for you. I do not see your declaration of being divined this knowledge as a compelling reason to codify it into law. Do you have more.?These aren’t my ideas or thoughts.
Show us where our ancestors say you shouldnt have an abortion. Looks like the first time there was even a law against abortion was in 1821 and that was to protect women from being poisoned.Sounds like you have this all well thought out for yourself. Is there a compelling reason your personal feelings should become the law of the land?
These aren’t my ideas or thoughts. These are the Morals and Values that humanity ran in for thousands of years. The intuitive Morality of the Soul that our eldest ancestors understood instinctively.
So they are those of other people. Good for you. I do not see your declaration of being divined this knowledge as a compelling reason to codify it into law. Do you have more.?
You believe a lot of stupid things. What makes this any different from your other thoughts?So they are those of other people. Good for you. I do not see your declaration of being divined this knowledge as a compelling reason to codify it into law. Do you have more.?
It is my belief that those Morals and Values are what the Divibevyses to judge our souls at the moment of our death. That judgement will have truly extreme consequences for each of us.
Okay, but why should anyone else believe such an extraordinary, magical claim?So they are those of other people. Good for you. I do not see your declaration of being divined this knowledge as a compelling reason to codify it into law. Do you have more.?
It is my belief that those Morals and Values are what the Divibevyses to judge our souls at the moment of our death. That judgement will have truly extreme consequences for each of us.
Mind you this is the same guy that doesnt believe in religion yet he is afraid the Divibevyses will judge his soul.Okay, but why should anyone else believe such an extraordinary, magical claim?So they are those of other people. Good for you. I do not see your declaration of being divined this knowledge as a compelling reason to codify it into law. Do you have more.?
It is my belief that those Morals and Values are what the Divibevyses to judge our souls at the moment of our death. That judgement will have truly extreme consequences for each of us.
Okay, but why should anyone else believe such an extraordinary, magical claim?