Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then so am i.......~S~So these guys are all insane, right?
I'm a bluecollar redneck from rural Vermont
the second part of my comment should cover that,,During that time there was no such thing as a military grade weapon versus a civilian weapon. They never foresaw an M-16, night vision goggles or laser sights. But they did realize there would be advancements in technology. So it doesn't matter whether we are in 1775, 2023 or 3050. Those amendments were written to include advancements of everything. Liberal arguments would have us going back to horse and buggy or flintlock firearms or even using a corner of a bedsheet for a condom..
well i do thank you Toob , but we are a tad ...... shall we politely say...socially scrutinized of late......~S~What could be more American?
This dude north of me tried to start a militia , the feds shut him down quicker than sh*t thru a goose.....~S~I'm pro second amendment but the second amendment that acknowledges the words "A well regulated militia" at the the beginning. If you want to own and keep a gun you should have to join a well regulated militia (not a militia of weekend warrior yahoos but something equivalent to the national guard) and follow their regulations with regards to what type up guns you can keep and how.
And how is that douche bag?
I'm pro second amendment but the second amendment that acknowledges the words "A well regulated militia" at the the beginning. If you want to own and keep a gun you should have to join a well regulated militia (not a militia of weekend warrior yahoos but something equivalent to the national guard) and follow their regulations with regards to what type up guns you can keep and how.
If you want to own and keep a gun you should have to join a well regulated militia
And how is that douche bag?
They all sound just like the religmo fundies Toob....~S~Isn't it funny Mike how all you hear for years is that the Constitution is a living document which needs reinterpreted to bring it up to date, but then when someone reads into the 2nd Amendment what the Founders wanted, they immediately revert to demanding it be taken literally by the letter of the writing and NOT ONE STEP FARTHER!
Kinda like saying that LGBTQ rights are one of the great pressing issues of the day all the while supporting Hamas, an organization who executes people for being gay.
If you want to own and keep a gun you should have to join a well regulated militia
Then why did they give the right to the people, and not just the militia?
Ergo the crux of the issue AuldThen why did they give the right to the people, and not just the militia?
They didn't give the right to all the people. The original purpose of the second amendment was for States, particularly Southern slave owning one's, to muster a fighting force capable of quickly putting down slave revolts in the context of a country that had no standing army.Then why did they give the right to the people, and not just the militia?
About this "well regulated militia B.S.I'm pro second amendment but the second amendment that acknowledges the words "A well regulated militia" at the the beginning. If you want to own and keep a gun you should have to join a well regulated militia (not a militia of weekend warrior yahoos but something equivalent to the national guard) and follow their regulations with regards to what type up guns you can keep and how.
The irrelevant peanut gallery has spoken, eh duck?It was serving a purpose until the call to arms to save a stolen election was completely ignored.
So forget about any 2A bullshit coming to the rescue to stop criminal government takeover of murica!