🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Proof Liberals Believe Blacks Are Inferior

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. Can black folks be as successful as whites?
Conservatives believe so.....Liberals don't.

That's why they make special rules based on skin color, and refuse to hold black folk to the same requirements as anyone else.
In their heart of hearts, Liberals just don't think blacks can make it, that they are not on a par with whites.


2. Here's a conservative who explains the difficulties blacks have in society:

"It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived."
Coulter, "Mugged," chapter seven




3. "Every now and then you come across an article that folks just need to read. This one written by Michael Smith entitled, “Confessions of a Public Defender”....is one of those articles.

It is a profound and deeply disturbing piece, which, as we end 2014, we all need to comprehend as we move towards the 50th anniversary of the Great Society initiatives of President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Smith articulates that which ails the black community–the real discussion we should be having on race, not that of victimhood and the further expansion of the welfare nanny-state..... I’m quite sure the progressive socialist left will criticize me for sharing this article–that’s just who they are–they hate the truth. But if there is a war to be fought, it is for the soul of the inner city and the black community."
Allen West
Quite Possibly the Most Racist Article You Will Ever Read American Renaissance




The following article is tough to read. Buckle your seat belts....and keep you hands inside the ride at all times.

4. " I am a public defender in a large southern metropolitan area. Fewer than ten percent of the people in the area I serve are black but over 90 per cent of my clients are black.... but there are a few whites.
[I'm still] liberal after all these years.



5. ... crime has racial patterns. Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children and driving under the influence. Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes. The handful of whites I see commit all kinds of crimes. In my many years as a public defender I have represented only three Asians, and one was half black.

6. As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

7. The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior. Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day.
[But- I'm still] liberal after all these years."
Confessions of a Public Defender American Renaissance

I like how she said all liberals think like that public defender.

Let me ask you PC, do you believe that black people are inherently prone to commit crimes by genetics?

So let's use your logic. You say ALL liberals think that blacks are inherently prone to commit crimes. So you say that no conservatives don't think that way about black people. Yet we have many posters like dannyboys and ShootSpeeder, who identify themselves as conservatives, who actually think that and even worse thoughts about black people.

So how do you reconcile that fact? Let me guess, you'll deflect and insult me.

Why does MSNBC have an ignorant fake "Reverend" who spreads lies and hate at rallies and hosting a political show?

1. He is a reverend.

2. What actual lies is he spreading? That's black people statistically deal with the police much more often for petty crimes like possession when drug use is equal among the races?

3. And how is he spreading hate? People didn't like police before all this. Remember Ice T's "Cop Killer" song? Yeah that was made in the 1980s. Black people have always talked about police brutality in their community AS WELL AS creating after school activities and other places for kids to go and do so they don't join gangs to end the violence which Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are very active in.

What have you done to end inner city violence?

I think that Al Sharpton is just another race baiter. He is another one who is just trying to cause division.

Al Sharpton is no better than Political Chicken. He is just the opposite of her.
 
You know, while I appreciate effort, it is sometimes very difficult to figure out which parts of the post are your personal thoughts as opposed to a cut and paste.

Exactly what is it that you are trying to say here with this post? Are you saying that you believe black people are less intelligent and more violent? What are YOUR thoughts about it? I'm not sure if these are someone else's thoughts or your thoughts.


1. I use quotation marks with precision.
I thought everyone had learned what their usage meant.

2. I have stated exactly what I mean.
You should have someone at a higher educational level than yours explain the OP to you.

3. "What are YOUR thoughts about it?"
Everything I post is of my thoughts.

4. "I'm not sure if these are someone else's thoughts or your thoughts."
Are you a moron?

Good Lord, trying to converse with you is like talking to a nasty teenager with a bad attitude. Seriously, adjust your horrible tude.
It has to be a race thing. Tell us why blacks play the knockout game, riot, and loot and Asians don't.

See, PC? This rightwinger insists that blacks are inferior.

He's my proof against yours. Plus my Charles Murray.

I win.

You didn't answer my question. Why do many blacks play knockout, riot and loot, but Asians don't?

Many compared to what?

Compare the number of black youth in college versus black youth that assault knock out?

Which group is larger?

Clearly Black kids in college is the vastly larger group, yet you use the smaller knock out group to compare as "black".

What other color would they be?
The color conservative Republicans love to say they love...Keep spreading the love.

Lol, this post is ironic. How exactly do you love them?
 
Use your head.

Oh? Perhaps you should learn to use yours before lecturing others. Not all blacks have to be poor. There are other means of exploitation, Carbine, as you would very well know.

Not ALL blacks are poor either.

Didn't I just say that?

No you said they don't "have to be poor." without acknowledging that a lot of them are not poor and some of them are rich!

And that is nitpicking. I already know for a fact not all of them are poor. All you have to do is turn on ESPN or BET to see that. But you chose to bring up a minutial argument.

Well, I agree that people like Al Sharpton exploit black people for their own benefit. However, Political Chicken's opening post has really nothing to do with that, but more with her trying to make all liberals the same, which is certainly not the case. There are some liberals who prescribe to Classical Liberalism which is NOTHING like modern liberalism and could almost be the opposite. See below, and this is why the Political Chicken is an ignoramus to the hilt.

  1. Classical liberalism is a philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets. Classical liberalismdeveloped in the nineteenth century in Western Europe, and the Americas.
 
There are some liberals who prescribe to Classical Liberalism which is NOTHING like modern liberalism and could almost be the opposite. See below, and this is why the Political Chicken is an ignoramus to the hilt.

If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

You call her a chicken and an ignoramus, but fail to present a counterpoint. Is this all you do? Call people names?
 
There are some liberals who prescribe to Classical Liberalism which is NOTHING like modern liberalism and could almost be the opposite. See below, and this is why the Political Chicken is an ignoramus to the hilt.

If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

You call her a chicken and an ignoramus, but fail to present a counterpoint. Is this all you do? Call people names?

I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same. Every person is an individual and has his/her own beliefs. What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!
 
1. Can black folks be as successful as whites?
Conservatives believe so.....Liberals don't.

That's why they make special rules based on skin color, and refuse to hold black folk to the same requirements as anyone else.
In their heart of hearts, Liberals just don't think blacks can make it, that they are not on a par with whites.


2. Here's a conservative who explains the difficulties blacks have in society:

"It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived."
Coulter, "Mugged," chapter seven




3. "Every now and then you come across an article that folks just need to read. This one written by Michael Smith entitled, “Confessions of a Public Defender”....is one of those articles.

It is a profound and deeply disturbing piece, which, as we end 2014, we all need to comprehend as we move towards the 50th anniversary of the Great Society initiatives of President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Smith articulates that which ails the black community–the real discussion we should be having on race, not that of victimhood and the further expansion of the welfare nanny-state..... I’m quite sure the progressive socialist left will criticize me for sharing this article–that’s just who they are–they hate the truth. But if there is a war to be fought, it is for the soul of the inner city and the black community."
Allen West
Quite Possibly the Most Racist Article You Will Ever Read American Renaissance




The following article is tough to read. Buckle your seat belts....and keep you hands inside the ride at all times.

4. " I am a public defender in a large southern metropolitan area. Fewer than ten percent of the people in the area I serve are black but over 90 per cent of my clients are black.... but there are a few whites.
[I'm still] liberal after all these years.



5. ... crime has racial patterns. Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children and driving under the influence. Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes. The handful of whites I see commit all kinds of crimes. In my many years as a public defender I have represented only three Asians, and one was half black.

6. As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

7. The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior. Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day.
[But- I'm still] liberal after all these years."
Confessions of a Public Defender American Renaissance

You know, while I appreciate effort, it is sometimes very difficult to figure out which parts of the post are your personal thoughts as opposed to a cut and paste.

Exactly what is it that you are trying to say here with this post? Are you saying that you believe black people are less intelligent and more violent? What are YOUR thoughts about it? I'm not sure if these are someone else's thoughts or your thoughts.


1. I use quotation marks with precision.
I thought everyone had learned what their usage meant.

2. I have stated exactly what I mean.
You should have someone at a higher educational level than yours explain the OP to you.

3. "What are YOUR thoughts about it?"
Everything I post is of my thoughts.

4. "I'm not sure if these are someone else's thoughts or your thoughts."
Are you a moron?

Good Lord, trying to converse with you is like talking to a nasty teenager with a bad attitude. Seriously, adjust your horrible tude.
How come Asians aren't playing the knockout game or looting stores?

Gee, I guess you think it's a race thing.

You're proof that all conservatives are racist.

See, PC? Your logic works!

It has to be a race thing. Tell us why blacks play the knockout game, riot, and loot and Asians don't.

See, PC? This rightwinger insists that blacks are inferior.

He's my proof against yours. Plus my Charles Murray.

I win.

You didn't answer my question. Why do many blacks play knockout, riot and loot, but Asians don't?

Many compared to what?

Compare the number of black youth in college versus black youth that assault knock out?

Which group is larger?

Clearly Black kids in college is the vastly larger group, yet you use the smaller knock out group to compare as "black".

That's not the point. The point is only blacks are doing it along with rioting and looting. Why not Asians? Aren't they also victims of "white privilege"?
 
I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same.

Counterpoints require supporting facts and evidence. I didn't see that.


What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

You always want to be opposite, without explaining why you are opposite.
 
There are some liberals who prescribe to Classical Liberalism which is NOTHING like modern liberalism and could almost be the opposite. See below, and this is why the Political Chicken is an ignoramus to the hilt.

If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

You call her a chicken and an ignoramus, but fail to present a counterpoint. Is this all you do? Call people names?

I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same. Every person is an individual and has his/her own beliefs. What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

The left has been saying the Tea Party is racist for years. All of you must agree with that because I never see a lib challenge it. It's propaganda and you know it.
 
There are some liberals who prescribe to Classical Liberalism which is NOTHING like modern liberalism and could almost be the opposite. See below, and this is why the Political Chicken is an ignoramus to the hilt.

If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

You call her a chicken and an ignoramus, but fail to present a counterpoint. Is this all you do? Call people names?

I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same. Every person is an individual and has his/her own beliefs. What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

The left has been saying the Tea Party is racist for years.

and I've had plenty of arguments about that too. One or two or even several people in the crowd holding signs or stirring up trouble does not mean the whole group thinks or feels that way.
 
If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

No, I've met and spoken to people who call themselves liberals and hold those beliefs.

Classical bandwagon argument...argumentum ad populum. Not buying it.

What exactly is it that you aren't buying. Please explain. That classic liberalism exists and that people do consider themselves a classic liberal? Well, that's your prerogative, but you would be wrong.
 
I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same.

Counterpoints require supporting facts and evidence. I didn't see that.


What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

You always want to be opposite, without explaining why you are opposite.

What exactly about my statements do you disagree with?
 
If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

No, I've met and spoken to people who call themselves liberals and hold those beliefs.

Classical bandwagon argument...argumentum ad populum. Not buying it.

What exactly is it that you aren't buying. Please explain. That classic liberalism exists and that people do consider themselves a classic liberal? Well, that's your prerogative, but you would be wrong.

I know classical liberalism exists, but that many people have no idea what it entails. You can consider yourself anything you want to be, but your behavior can indicate otherwise.
 
I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same.

Counterpoints require supporting facts and evidence. I didn't see that.


What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

You always want to be opposite, without explaining why you are opposite.

What exactly about my statements do you disagree with?

Go back and read.
 
If some liberals actually did subscribe to classical liberalism, they would be conservatives today.

No, I've met and spoken to people who call themselves liberals and hold those beliefs.

Classical bandwagon argument...argumentum ad populum. Not buying it.

What exactly is it that you aren't buying. Please explain. That classic liberalism exists and that people do consider themselves a classic liberal? Well, that's your prerogative, but you would be wrong.

I know classical liberalism exists, but that many people have no idea what it entails. You can consider yourself anything you want to be, but your behavior can indicate otherwise.

I don't see what that has to do with anything. Classic liberalism exists and some liberals prescribe to that belief. It may not be many, but it still goes to show that people are individuals and can have different beliefs. Just because ONE person makes comments or tells an anecdote, that certainly does not indicate that everyone in the group feels the same. Just like the liberals with insulting the TEA party, I really see no difference here, except it's a conservative saying it about liberals.
 
I DID make a counterpoint. I said I disagree, all liberals are NOT the same and do not all believe the same.

Counterpoints require supporting facts and evidence. I didn't see that.


What is the difference between her making these claims, and the liberals claiming that all conservatives are racist? Nothing!! It's the same, only opposite!

You always want to be opposite, without explaining why you are opposite.

What exactly about my statements do you disagree with?

Go back and read.

I don't need to. I am well aware of everything I've said. Now you are telling me I am wrong. What am I wrong about?
 
One or two or even several people in the crowd holding signs or stirring up trouble does not mean the whole group thinks or feels that way.

Ah, but that wasn't the case during the Occupy protests.

I can't comment, as I wasn't a participant and cannot say how every single person who attended feels in their heart or mind. You can?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top