TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
The Democratic Party is incredibly diverse and inclusive with major involvement of blacks, women, minorities, gays, Jews, Muslims.
Let me remind you, "diverse" does not equal "effective." You elect people based on those traits, not based on if they will be effective in the positions you elect them for. You sacrifice efficacy for ethnicity, reliability for race. All for the sake of "diversity."
Your strategy is flawed, and it is starting to fall apart.
Starting with Black Women, when Winsome Sears was elected in Virginia, the media was silent or essentially labeled the people who voted for her as "white supremacists."
The NAACP essentially disowned Deneen Borelli because she was a Republican.
As far as black people go in general, you need only see how your party reacted to people like Ben Carson and Allen West. There are numerous examples where your party had a hostile reaction to a person of color having views contrary to theirs.
With women in general, you need only look to how your party and media reacted to Melania Trump and Sarah Palin.
As far as minorities go, see no further than Virginia AG-Elect Jason Miyares. I don't see you cheering the first, only putting Republicans down for seemingly being so far behind. Like I said in the beginning, Republicans look for effective candidates, not for skin color, race, gender, or ethnicity. We want performance not moral preening.
As far as Jews go, simply look at how your party treats Judeo-Christian beliefs in general.
Then we turn to gays, where we need only look at people like Andy Ngo and how your party reacts to him.
Muslims are a unique case, when you denigrate religion in general but embrace a religion that is overly zealous in its spread, willing to promote theocratic ideals in American society, sometimes attempting violence, all while saying Christians are attempting to do the same thing.
Am I missing anything?
It's one thing to be diverse, but another to be diverse and promote the actual practice of diversity in American society. Your party has perverted the practice and turned it into a weapon of exclusion and coercion. As an addendum, I would be confident in saying that your party displays that same attitude with free speech, where you need only look at how big tech censors conservative viewpoints in the public sphere.
So you can spare me the bragging and arrogance. I don't believe a word of it.
Last edited: