Proof That Obama Is A Mistake

I read and understood your attempt at being clever the first time.
Friendly advice.....clever will never be associated with your name.


Work on 'educated' first.
Work hard.

I really enjoy it when you and I get together like this. The other threads are so taxing. Working with you we keep it simple.

Your OP was seriously flawed. Since then you have done nothing but restate your original logic and bash me. Let's do lunch some time.



You misunderstand: I’m not insulting you, I’m describing you.

The only flaw is in your ability to comprehend.

I don’t dislike you personally…it’s just that I’m a member of the Partnership For An Idiot Free America, so you’re on my list.

Does that mean lunch is on or off? :cool:
 
Of course Sweden is a constitutional monarchy that is relatively sparsely populated when compared to the U.S. Something that works for Sweden does not necessarily work for the U.S., which has a much more diverse population.

Although you elevate Sweden as the model of modern economies, it is still very much a "socialist" model when compared to the U.S. In other words, the U.S. would have to become much more "socialist" if it were to approximate the Swedish model--let's begin, for example, with true national health care. It also avoids regional/global wars, and saves a HELL of a lot of money by not building an empirial military.

Sweden is one of the most equal nations in the world in terms of income. Did you know that? If the U.S. could emulate that, it would help our economy a lot. It also has one of the most highly developed welfare states in the world.

ALSO, about 80% of the Swedish workforce is unionized, and they also have the right to elect two representatives to the board in all Swedish companies with more than 25 employees--that's pretty socialist by modern standards. ALSO, Sweden has a relatively high amount of sick leave per worker--the average worker loses 24 days per year due to sickness.

SO, Sweden is a curious example for any right winger to hold up in terms of what "works" for economic success. I would have thought that you would avoid Sweden as a subject for discussion.

I can see why you'd rather focus on the social dimensions....

...but, not I.

Here it is again, conservative tactics are proving successful:

.Sweden has reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP from 67% in 1993 to 49% today…. It has also cut the top marginal tax rate by 27 percentage points since 1983, to 57%, and scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance. This year it is cutting the corporate-tax rate from 26.3% to 22%.



Further....it is of more than passing interest that the Left-leaning 'Economist' has chosen to highlight both the improvements in the economic outlook for Sweden....

...and the conservative nature of the anodyne.


And, I really like this: it has introduced a universal system of school vouchers and invited private schools to compete with public ones.

This is the problem with you folks.

You cherry pick the things you like..and toss out the rest.

That's kinda like taking the cigarette lighter out of the car.

And then trying to drive the cigarette lighter.

Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?
 
I really enjoy it when you and I get together like this. The other threads are so taxing. Working with you we keep it simple.

Your OP was seriously flawed. Since then you have done nothing but restate your original logic and bash me. Let's do lunch some time.



You misunderstand: I’m not insulting you, I’m describing you.

The only flaw is in your ability to comprehend.

I don’t dislike you personally…it’s just that I’m a member of the Partnership For An Idiot Free America, so you’re on my list.

Does that mean lunch is on or off? :cool:

Heck, no....


...but you should bring a taster.
 
I can see why you'd rather focus on the social dimensions....

...but, not I.

Here it is again, conservative tactics are proving successful:

.Sweden has reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP from 67% in 1993 to 49% today…. It has also cut the top marginal tax rate by 27 percentage points since 1983, to 57%, and scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance. This year it is cutting the corporate-tax rate from 26.3% to 22%.



Further....it is of more than passing interest that the Left-leaning 'Economist' has chosen to highlight both the improvements in the economic outlook for Sweden....

...and the conservative nature of the anodyne.


And, I really like this: it has introduced a universal system of school vouchers and invited private schools to compete with public ones.

This is the problem with you folks.

You cherry pick the things you like..and toss out the rest.

That's kinda like taking the cigarette lighter out of the car.

And then trying to drive the cigarette lighter.

Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:
 
This is the problem with you folks.

You cherry pick the things you like..and toss out the rest.

That's kinda like taking the cigarette lighter out of the car.

And then trying to drive the cigarette lighter.

Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:


"There's nothing to refute."
Is this another of those 'is not, is not' posts??


Post #8, Sally.

Chock full of stuff for you two to munch on....then you won't need lunch.
 
This is the problem with you folks.

You cherry pick the things you like..and toss out the rest.

That's kinda like taking the cigarette lighter out of the car.

And then trying to drive the cigarette lighter.

Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:

Lunch for everyone!

Come on PC, you haven't added anything since your first post. Then again...
 
Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:


"There's nothing to refute."
Is this another of those 'is not, is not' posts??


Post #8, Sally.

Chock full of stuff for you two to munch on....then you won't need lunch.

*Choke
That wasn't a slip of the tongue was it? :eusa_angel:
 
Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:

Lunch for everyone!

Come on PC, you haven't added anything since your first post. Then again...

Post #8 buried you.....didn't it?
 
Sideshow Sal!
How nice of you to drop by!
....not to add anything to the conversation....just to drop by.


Essentially, your post means that you don't agree with my construction, the OP?
Really?
Never would have guessed.

Too bad you can't refute it....or even show any problems with it....

but..."This is the problem with you folks".....no ability.


True.?

There's nothing to refute.

Let's do lunch.

:cool:


"There's nothing to refute."
Is this another of those 'is not, is not' posts??


Post #8, Sally.

Chock full of stuff for you two to munch on....then you won't need lunch.

Guess it's true what they say, then..

"There's no free lunch."

:sad:
 
"There's nothing to refute."
Is this another of those 'is not, is not' posts??


Post #8, Sally.

Chock full of stuff for you two to munch on....then you won't need lunch.

Guess it's true what they say, then..

"There's no free lunch."

:sad:

PC is always complaining she is feeding the masses. Don't we count?



Are you really this lonely?

Good news: I was able to sign you up for “The Hunger Games.” You’ll do just fine.
 
PC is always complaining she is feeding the masses. Don't we count?



Are you really this lonely?

Good news: I was able to sign you up for “The Hunger Games.” You’ll do just fine.

Girl, you have no idea. ;)

Do these Hunger Games include lunch?


I thought I recognized you......



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlovw2C4QQI]Geico's Maxwell The Pig Is Back! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! - YouTube[/ame]
 
Are you really this lonely?

Good news: I was able to sign you up for “The Hunger Games.” You’ll do just fine.

Girl, you have no idea. ;)

Do these Hunger Games include lunch?


I thought I recognized you......



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlovw2C4QQI]Geico's Maxwell The Pig Is Back! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! - YouTube[/ame]

If we do lunch I promise not to sit on the table. Although no guarantee on that WEEEEEEEE thing. I'm easily excited.
 

If we do lunch I promise not to sit on the table. Although no guarantee on that WEEEEEEEE thing. I'm easily excited.

You say that every time.....

No. I promise this time will be different. No sitting on table. Got it. Well, at least if I do I will keep my shirt on. I'm keeping the pinwheels though.
 
Of course Sweden is a constitutional monarchy that is relatively sparsely populated when compared to the U.S. Something that works for Sweden does not necessarily work for the U.S., which has a much more diverse population.

Although you elevate Sweden as the model of modern economies, it is still very much a "socialist" model when compared to the U.S. In other words, the U.S. would have to become much more "socialist" if it were to approximate the Swedish model--let's begin, for example, with true national health care. It also avoids regional/global wars, and saves a HELL of a lot of money by not building an empirial military.

Sweden is one of the most equal nations in the world in terms of income. Did you know that? If the U.S. could emulate that, it would help our economy a lot. It also has one of the most highly developed welfare states in the world.

ALSO, about 80% of the Swedish workforce is unionized, and they also have the right to elect two representatives to the board in all Swedish companies with more than 25 employees--that's pretty socialist by modern standards. ALSO, Sweden has a relatively high amount of sick leave per worker--the average worker loses 24 days per year due to sickness.

SO, Sweden is a curious example for any right winger to hold up in terms of what "works" for economic success. I would have thought that you would avoid Sweden as a subject for discussion.

I can see why you'd rather focus on the social dimensions....

...but, not I.

Here it is again, conservative tactics are proving successful:

.Sweden has reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP from 67% in 1993 to 49% today…. It has also cut the top marginal tax rate by 27 percentage points since 1983, to 57%, and scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance. This year it is cutting the corporate-tax rate from 26.3% to 22%.



Further....it is of more than passing interest that the Left-leaning 'Economist' has chosen to highlight both the improvements in the economic outlook for Sweden....

...and the conservative nature of the anodyne.


And, I really like this: it has introduced a universal system of school vouchers and invited private schools to compete with public ones.

Ok lets raise the top tax rate to 57% since you say it works
 
:shock: No. Wait. No! I'll get off the table. Just put that thing down. Have you gone crazy woman?! NNooooo!:eek:
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vz7RPQK9uM&list=UUodFukhjP5LQDdOCSo3oWqQ&index=13]GEICO Maxwell The Pig Totally Destroyed WEE WEEEEEEEE - YouTube[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top