Prosecutor In Rittenhouse Trial Aims AR-15 At Jury With His Finger On The Trigger

[theHawk]

 

[tahuyaman]

The law does state that one loses the right to claim self defense when they provoke a confrontation.

Generally arming yourself snd entering a violent riot on one side or the other is views as a provocative act.

 

[Doc7505]

Prosecutor idiot in Rittenhouse case is a prime example of the cluelessness of liberals when it comes to guns.

1. He said >>

‘You Lose The Right To Self-Defense When You’re The One Who Brought The Gun’

EARTH TO BIRDBRAIN PROSECUTOR: Millions of Americans bring a gun every day, everywhere they go (banks, supermarkets, department stores, post offices). They don't lose ANY right to self-defense, by doing that - a right guaranteed to them by state law (as long as they have a permit to carry), and the Constitution's 2nd Amendment. 2. The utter fool has no idea how to properly handle a gun. You never point it at people, unless you intend to shoot them (he pointed an AR15 at the jury). And you never put your finger on the trigger, unless you intend to shoot somebody. Damn fool had his finger on the trigger, when he pointed the gun at the jury. He might have little talk with Alec Baldwin. Rittenhouse Prosecutor Violates Gun Safety, Points AR-15 with Finger on Trigger at Court Full of People 'ABSOLUTE CLOWN. Don’t pull a Baldwin,' former NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch tweeted about Binger's demonstration. www.westernjournal.com

You left out the other part. Until today they never measured the length of the AR-15 which in this case the gun barrel is standard length which allowed Kyle the ability to possess the weapon even at 17 yrs of age in the State of Wisconsin. Toss out another charge made against Rittenhouse.

 

[theHawk]

His point was that Rittenhouse instigated. When you instigate you lose the whole self defense thing.

Except there is no evidence whatsoever he instigated anything. He was attacked by a maniac child molester and a mob yelling “get him”.

 

[theHawk]

not really. Go ahead and complain about violating the rules of gun safety. See if you can do so without making stuff up or spreading lies. That's all. Doubt you can do it, though...

It wasn’t just violating gun safety rules, he broke Wisconsin law when pointing the gun at the jury:

941.20  Endangering safety by use of dangerous weapon.

(1) Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor:

(a) Endangers another's safety by the negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon; or

..

(c) Except as provided in sub. (1m), intentionally points a firearm at or toward another.

There are no exceptions for the weapon not being loaded.

Binger should be impeached and charged immediately.

 

[toobfreak]

He graduated from the Alec Baldwin School of Gun Safety:

Probably the first time that feckless bastard has ever touched a gun! I almost wish I could say I wish it had been loaded and went off shooting some girl, but I won't go there. The idiots would just blame that too on the gun.

 

[Markle]

Except there is no evidence whatsoever he instigated anything. He was attacked by a maniac child molester and a mob yelling “get him”.

Worse, the crowd was shouting "CRANIUM, CRANIUM". I didn't know what it meant but I have learned that it means "SHOOT HIM IN THE HEAD".

 

[westwall]

He was making a point.

Yeah, that he is a incredible moron, and a hazard to anyone near him.

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

The law does state that one loses the right to claim self defense when they provoke a confrontation.

Generally arming yourself snd entering a violent riot on one side or the other is views as a provocative act.

Provoke a confrontation? lol a riot and large-scale protest which included arson is already confrontational and provocative.

All you guys on the left are as bad as each other. Hypocrites with no real awareness of anything - sadly the prosecutors and courts seem to be on your side when it comes to all this stuff.

This Kyle kid will be another sacrificial lamb the same way Chauvin was to appease the leftist maddos. Trial by emotion and social media.

I heard the prosecutor's closing argument/s and he sounded so far out his depth talking in tones like you'd hear at a boardroom presentation from a low-end executive trying to earn some respect with the flim-flam talk.

 

[MisterBeale]

The law does state that one loses the right to claim self defense when they provoke a confrontation.

Generally arming yourself snd entering a violent riot on one side or the other is views as a provocative act.

So no policeman or security guard can ever claim self defense?

 

[Burgermeister]

Someone on the jury should have yelled at the judge to have the rifle taken away from that idiot. He would have. Unbelievably stupid.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What point do you imagine Baldwin was making in that diseased lump you call a mind?

Well, if you were an informed individual instead of the unthinking sheeple useful idiot awaiting orders on what to think that you are, you’d know Baldwin was upset on having to retake a scene so fired his gun at the crew.

 

[wamose]

This prosecutor is as much of an idiot as the people who got themselves shot.

 

[Claudette]

Weatherman2020
Jesus. Finger on the trigger?? No one ever showed this idiot gun safety. What a moron.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[MisterBeale]

Someone on the jury should have yelled at the judge to have the rifle taken away from that idiot. He would have. Unbelievably stupid.

Not to worry, he takes his queues from Alec Baldwin on gun handling . . .

 

[Jets]

All firearms should be treated as if they are loaded. There are ZERO excuses for this prosecutor to have his finger on the trigger.

Period

 

[Resnic]

The law does state that one loses the right to claim self defense when they provoke a confrontation.

Generally arming yourself snd entering a violent riot on one side or the other is views as a provocative act.

So you're ok with the rioting and burning?

But you're not ok with someone trying to put out the fires and help, then when they are attacked they can't defend themselves?

I carry a gun all the time, so if I am carrying a gun you're saying I shouldn't go to an area where I might get attacked because if I do and I protect myself I am not allowed to defend myself?

You're just pulling arbitrary shit out of your ass. You don't know anything about the law. You just don't like him and will state something as fact because it sounds good to you.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The law does state that one loses the right to claim self defense when they provoke a confrontation.

Generally arming yourself snd entering a violent riot on one side or the other is views as a provocative act.

And that "reasoning" has been routinely shot down as BULLSHIT.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Don't you ever get tired of being stupid?

And wrong?

Do you ever get tired of not explaining ourself?