Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2013
- 94,410
- 66,224
- Thread starter
- #41
What’s on the other side of that wall behind the jurors?Don't see him pointing it at a person, there.
Got anything else?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What’s on the other side of that wall behind the jurors?Don't see him pointing it at a person, there.
Got anything else?
I don't know. Do you pretend to know?What’s on the other side of that wall behind the jurors?
Violation of the first 3 rules of gun safety and you’re here spinning to defend him.I don't know. Do you pretend to know?
I am not endorsing what he did. I am saying you gullible dummies are eating shit again. Gleefully.
not really. Go ahead and complain about violating the rules of gun safety. See if you can do so without making stuff up or spreading lies. That's all. Doubt you can do it, though...Violation of the first 3 rules of gun safety and you’re here spinning to defend him.
You would rather take a sharp stick in the eye rather than admit you were wrong about anything, right?Don't see him pointing it at a person, there.
Got anything else?
I believe the jurors are already scared.Yeah he is trying to scare them into a guilty verdict. Hoping they are afraid of the weapon and project that fear onto Rittenhouse because they are unable to win the case anyother way.
I believe the jurors are already scared.
People have been taking photos of them and a member of BLM has already threatened them on TV if they reach the "wrong" verdict. The "wrong" verdict, according to BLM, is a "NOT GUILTY" verdict. The junk gun charge has already been dropped by the judge.
He was making a point.
the next absurdity out of your mouth will be that his finger wasn't on the trigger.So where is the image of him pointing it at people? Oh, riiiight... made up nonsense. I suppose that's why it's only the most scummy right wing nutjob tweeters circulating it.
So is the courtroom. But not every cubic inch. That would just be silly. So where is the picture of him pointing it at people, and not at a wall?
What point do you imagine Baldwin was making in that diseased lump you call a mind?So was Alec Baldwin.
You kids are all making my point for me.And that's a reason to ignore gun safety laws? In fact, just the opposite, it would be more effective if the prosecutor had emphasized using gun safety. Would it not?
His point was that Rittenhouse instigated. When you instigate you lose the whole self defense thing.What was his point? That he can point an AR at innocent people and not lose his right to own a gun but if you're a couple doing the same thing outside your own trying to protect it from rioters you will? So his point is just how stupid our fucking country is?
‘You Lose The Right To Self-Defense When You’re The One Who Brought The Gun’ | ||
---|---|---|
EARTH TO BIRDBRAIN PROSECUTOR: Millions of Americans bring a gun every day, everywhere they go (banks, supermarkets, department stores, post offices). They don't lose ANY right to self-defense, by doing that - a right guaranteed to them by state law (as long as they have a permit to carry), and the Constitution's 2nd Amendment. 2. The utter fool has no idea how to properly handle a gun. You never point it at people, unless you intend to shoot them (he pointed an AR15 at the jury). And you never put your finger on the trigger, unless you intend to shoot somebody. Damn fool had his finger on the trigger, when he pointed the gun at the jury. He might have little talk with Alec Baldwin. ![]() Rittenhouse Prosecutor Violates Gun Safety, Points AR-15 with Finger on Trigger at Court Full of People 'ABSOLUTE CLOWN. Don’t pull a Baldwin,' former NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch tweeted about Binger's demonstration. ![]() www.westernjournal.com |
His point was that Rittenhouse instigated. When you instigate you lose the whole self defense thing.