Protesters in Wisconsin cause $7.5 million in damage to State House

[The T]

I guess $1million.....Statehouse maintenance does not come cheap. Only teachers come cheap

No...only what they teach our children is CHEAP...we see the rewards of funneling money...students that can't read...our sinking status in the world in education?

Where's ALL that money going? Educating kids? NOPE...It goes to paying pensions, and lavish lifestyles of the Union Thugs.

Of course, the kids are just little widgets to be processed.

Indeed...Indoctrinated with Statist bullsqueeze against the wishes of the parents...

Thanks for freely admitting it. KUDOS.

 

[rightwinger]

I found this troubling, from the link in the OP;

Outside the Capitol Thursday, police found live ammunition. Officers say 41 rounds were found morning scattered at a number of spots.

Why is that troubling? Isn't ammo legal?

Guns don't kill people.....bullets kill people

 

[The T]

I found this troubling, from the link in the OP;

Why is that troubling? Isn't ammo legal?

Guns don't kill people.....bullets kill people

Wrong on BOTH counts...the person operating the weapon...but YOU knew that didn't you?

 

[Trajan]

I found this troubling, from the link in the OP;

Outside the Capitol Thursday, police found live ammunition. Officers say 41 rounds were found morning scattered at a number of spots.

Why is that troubling? Isn't ammo legal?

so is carrying in Arizona but well, you know...

 

[Trajan]

I found this troubling, from the link in the OP;

Why is that troubling? Isn't ammo legal?

Guns don't kill people.....bullets kill people

 

[JBeukema]

They're lib's.

They belong to someone named lib?

 

[rightwinger]

I found this troubling, from the link in the OP;

Why is that troubling? Isn't ammo legal?

so is carrying in Arizona but well, you know...

Do you think someone showed up to try to shoot the protestors?

 

[DiveCon]

Read the OP

LIAR
the OP said nothing of the sort

Read the title of this thread and then read the article linked in the OP

Its says it will cost an estimated $7.5 million

liar again

the title doesnt say just to remove tape
its says DAMAGES
tape removal was only PART of it

 

[JBeukema]

SOURCE

The whole point here is the fact that they caused damage....and the taxpayers have to eat the cost?

I say they (protestors or their surrogates) get billed for whatever it is.

So the same idiots who were claiming $7.5 million are now claiming $350k. How much credibility should I give this new estimate?

again you lack reading comprehension
they didnt say it was ONLY $350,000
but COULD be as low as'

350k-7.5m?

 

[JBeukema]

LIAR
the OP said nothing of the sort

Read the title of this thread and then read the article linked in the OP

Its says it will cost an estimated $7.5 million

liar again

the title doesnt say just to remove tape
its says DAMAGES
tape removal was only PART of it

It says stains from the tape in the article

 

[JBeukema]

SOURCE

The whole point here is the fact that they caused damage....and the taxpayers have to eat the cost?

I say they (protestors or their surrogates) get billed for whatever it is.

So the same idiots who were claiming $7.5 million are now claiming $350k. How much credibility should I give this new estimate?

Who cares? Even $.01 is too much .

How's that grab ya stupid?

So you don't care about what's true? Typical partisan idiocy.

 

[AllieBaba]

So the same idiots who were claiming $7.5 million are now claiming $350k. How much credibility should I give this new estimate?

Who cares? Even $.01 is too much .

How's that grab ya stupid?

So you don't care about what's true? Typical partisan idiocy.

The truth is that there is substantial damage.

Typical partisan idiocy to pretend that's not the issue.

 

[JBeukema]

Since you can't read, I don't see what the point would be.

I assume that means you have no link....not surprising

no, it means she wont waste her time posting it for a fucking moron like YOU

It means she can't back up her claim

 

[DiveCon]

Read the title of this thread and then read the article linked in the OP

Its says it will cost an estimated $7.5 million

liar again

the title doesnt say just to remove tape
its says DAMAGES
tape removal was only PART of it

It says stains from the tape in the article

yes, it says stains from the tape as one of the things that needed repair
but it didnt list all of the repairs

 

[AllieBaba]

Er..I already said there were no bullet holes.

But carry on as if I didn't.

 

[DiveCon]

I assume that means you have no link....not surprising

no, it means she wont waste her time posting it for a fucking moron like YOU

It means she can't back up her claim

no, it means just what i said
but, she did admit she made an error and it wasnt shots fired

 

[JBeukema]

People find liars offensive. Own it.

I'm a liar??

Was I the one who claimed it costs $7.5 million to clean up tape marks?

that right there is a lie

NO ONE claimed any such thing

Do you not know what thread your in?

 

[bodecea]

Who cares? Even $.01 is too much .

How's that grab ya stupid?

So you don't care about what's true? Typical partisan idiocy.

The truth is that there is substantial damage.

Typical partisan idiocy to pretend that's not the issue.

Define "substantial damage". Some bullets lying around and tape marks...Big whoop.

 

[The T]

So the same idiots who were claiming $7.5 million are now claiming $350k. How much credibility should I give this new estimate?

Who cares? Even $.01 is too much .

How's that grab ya stupid?

So you don't care about what's true? Typical partisan idiocy.

And what PARTY would that be...and more succinctly? WHICH do *I* belong...? Hmmm?

Have an answer? ASS U ME much do you?

 

[DiveCon]

I'm a liar??

Was I the one who claimed it costs $7.5 million to clean up tape marks?

that right there is a lie

NO ONE claimed any such thing

Do you not know what thread your in?

yes, i do

do YOU?
no one made the claims that it was JUST to clean up tape
get your head out of your ass and actually read what was posted