Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did not refer to isolationism as a "BOGEYMAN"------I merely noted that it was the
position of the people in the USA who advocated a "leave adolf to his own whims" policy. It delayed the inevitable conflict-----which probably could have
been amerliorated by EARLIER ACTION. IMHO-----world war III has already begun------a far more active role than we have at present is INEVITABLE-----the US did not cause it-------the US is slow in stopping it
Hitler's dead. Has been for a very long time. He's no excuse for this absurd constant meddling all over the world.
somehow you excuse EXTENSIVE meddling by -----RUSSIAN IMPERIALISTS---
and now IRANIAN IMPERIALISTS -----and a rapidly developing MEDDLING
by CHINESE IMPERIALISTS. I cited ADOLF because he was ----in the 1930s
engaging in VERY EXTENSIVE IMPERIALIST MEDDLING whilst those of your ilk did the TWIDDLE THE THUMBS thing
Why does that scare you so much? What's Russia and China gonna do that frightens you so much? The U.S. has plenty of money and has the most powerful military on earth. So let em meddle. We've done enough of it. Time to come home and take care of our own.
what makes you think I IS SCARED-------I am safe------I am concerned about the
rest of the Planet. Your meddling pal-------ADOLF ----was probably no real threat to the Hillbillies of APPALACHIA either
So what do you think Russia and China are gonna do to destroy the world? I'm willing to listen. Go for it.
But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
Henry Kissinger visited Putin this week and wrote an article. He says: "Russia is NO threat to US"
Today threats more frequently arise from the disintegration of state power and the growing number of ungoverned territories. This spreading power vacuum cannot be dealt with by any state, no matter how powerful, on an exclusively national basis. It requires sustained cooperation between the United States and Russia, and other major powers.
Regarding Syria, it is clear that the local and regional factions cannot find a solution on their own. Compatible U.S.-Russian efforts coordinated with other major powers could create a pattern for peaceful solutions in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere.
What challenges do the changes pose to both Russian and American national interests? How do we reconcile the very different concepts of world order that have evolved in Russia and the United States—and in other major powers—on the basis of historical experience? The goal should be to develop a strategic concept for U.S.-Russian relations within which the points of contention may be managed.
Kissinger’s Vision for U.S.-Russia Relations
Hitler's dead. Has been for a very long time. He's no excuse for this absurd constant meddling all over the world.
somehow you excuse EXTENSIVE meddling by -----RUSSIAN IMPERIALISTS---
and now IRANIAN IMPERIALISTS -----and a rapidly developing MEDDLING
by CHINESE IMPERIALISTS. I cited ADOLF because he was ----in the 1930s
engaging in VERY EXTENSIVE IMPERIALIST MEDDLING whilst those of your ilk did the TWIDDLE THE THUMBS thing
Why does that scare you so much? What's Russia and China gonna do that frightens you so much? The U.S. has plenty of money and has the most powerful military on earth. So let em meddle. We've done enough of it. Time to come home and take care of our own.
what makes you think I IS SCARED-------I am safe------I am concerned about the
rest of the Planet. Your meddling pal-------ADOLF ----was probably no real threat to the Hillbillies of APPALACHIA either
So what do you think Russia and China are gonna do to destroy the world? I'm willing to listen. Go for it.
easy------wrap your minibrain around this concept------Russia, Iran, Syria----and whole lot of Shiite muslims around the world = THE AXIS ALLIANCE,
Right now -----Yemen = DAS SUDENTENLAND and Saudi Arabia is FRANCE.
you want to ignore it---------ok------sit tight and pay attention to that which is
going to happen within the next two years
.
Henry Kissinger visited Putin this week and wrote an article. He says: "Russia is NO threat to US"
Today threats more frequently arise from the disintegration of state power and the growing number of ungoverned territories. This spreading power vacuum cannot be dealt with by any state, no matter how powerful, on an exclusively national basis. It requires sustained cooperation between the United States and Russia, and other major powers.
Regarding Syria, it is clear that the local and regional factions cannot find a solution on their own. Compatible U.S.-Russian efforts coordinated with other major powers could create a pattern for peaceful solutions in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere.
What challenges do the changes pose to both Russian and American national interests? How do we reconcile the very different concepts of world order that have evolved in Russia and the United States—and in other major powers—on the basis of historical experience? The goal should be to develop a strategic concept for U.S.-Russian relations within which the points of contention may be managed.
Kissinger’s Vision for U.S.-Russia Relations
Kissinger would be right IF the US and RUSSIA shared his vision-----
Russia does not------it is in IMPERIALIST MODE
But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
what makes the history WINDOW OF KILLING------30 years. Why not cite the past
100 years?
But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
what makes the history WINDOW OF KILLING------30 years. Why not cite the past
100 years?
Most Americans ignore that ugly reality. But the numbers of civilians slaughtered by their Government is incredibly shocking. Just look at the last 30yrs or so alone. No other nation on earth can come close to the number of civilians slaughtered by the U.S. Government.
Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
Paulitician, no matter how solid your arguments are, those libtards will never agree with them: too dumb and seriously brainwashed to see the truth.
Henry Kissinger visited Putin this week and wrote an article. He says: "Russia is NO threat to US"
Today threats more frequently arise from the disintegration of state power and the growing number of ungoverned territories. This spreading power vacuum cannot be dealt with by any state, no matter how powerful, on an exclusively national basis. It requires sustained cooperation between the United States and Russia, and other major powers.
Regarding Syria, it is clear that the local and regional factions cannot find a solution on their own. Compatible U.S.-Russian efforts coordinated with other major powers could create a pattern for peaceful solutions in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere.
What challenges do the changes pose to both Russian and American national interests? How do we reconcile the very different concepts of world order that have evolved in Russia and the United States—and in other major powers—on the basis of historical experience? The goal should be to develop a strategic concept for U.S.-Russian relations within which the points of contention may be managed.
Kissinger’s Vision for U.S.-Russia Relations
Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
Paulitician, no matter how solid your arguments are, those libtards will never agree with them: too dumb and seriously brainwashed to see the truth.
Henry Kissinger visited Putin this week and wrote an article. He says: "Russia is NO threat to US"
Today threats more frequently arise from the disintegration of state power and the growing number of ungoverned territories. This spreading power vacuum cannot be dealt with by any state, no matter how powerful, on an exclusively national basis. It requires sustained cooperation between the United States and Russia, and other major powers.
Regarding Syria, it is clear that the local and regional factions cannot find a solution on their own. Compatible U.S.-Russian efforts coordinated with other major powers could create a pattern for peaceful solutions in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere.
What challenges do the changes pose to both Russian and American national interests? How do we reconcile the very different concepts of world order that have evolved in Russia and the United States—and in other major powers—on the basis of historical experience? The goal should be to develop a strategic concept for U.S.-Russian relations within which the points of contention may be managed.
Kissinger’s Vision for U.S.-Russia Relations
I'm not sure about China threat. But US/Russian cooperation would help both countries and significantly ease confrontation in the world. Watch how efficiently American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts work together for so many years! That could be a great example for the politicians. Unfortunately, no hopes till the current clown in the White House is gone...Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.
I'm not sure about China threat. But US/Russian cooperation would help both countries and significantly ease up confrontation in the world. Watch how efficiently American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts work together! That could be a great example for the politicians. Unfortunately, no hopes till the current clown in the White House is gone...Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.
No hopes for somebody like you, Rosie, for sure. People with such chicken brain are hopeless, period.I'm not sure about China threat. But US/Russian cooperation would help both countries and significantly ease up confrontation in the world. Watch how efficiently American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts work together! That could be a great example for the politicians. Unfortunately, no hopes till the current clown in the White House is gone...Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.
no hope until Russia gives up the IMPERIALISM mania-------that phenomenon may
be a PUTIN thing
Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.But getting back to killing civilians. Seriously, how can the U.S. preach to others about that? No other nation has even come close to slaughtering as many civilians as the U.S. has the last 30yrs or so. That's the ugly truth America. Wake the fluck up.
Paulitician, no matter how solid your arguments are, those libtards will never agree with them: too dumb and seriously brainwashed to see the truth.
Henry Kissinger visited Putin this week and wrote an article. He says: "Russia is NO threat to US"
Today threats more frequently arise from the disintegration of state power and the growing number of ungoverned territories. This spreading power vacuum cannot be dealt with by any state, no matter how powerful, on an exclusively national basis. It requires sustained cooperation between the United States and Russia, and other major powers.
Regarding Syria, it is clear that the local and regional factions cannot find a solution on their own. Compatible U.S.-Russian efforts coordinated with other major powers could create a pattern for peaceful solutions in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere.
What challenges do the changes pose to both Russian and American national interests? How do we reconcile the very different concepts of world order that have evolved in Russia and the United States—and in other major powers—on the basis of historical experience? The goal should be to develop a strategic concept for U.S.-Russian relations within which the points of contention may be managed.
Kissinger’s Vision for U.S.-Russia Relations
Don't underestimate China's imperialistic tendencies.I'm not sure about China threat. But US/Russian cooperation would help both countries and significantly ease up confrontation in the world. Watch how efficiently American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts work together! That could be a great example for the politicians. Unfortunately, not with the current clown in the White House....Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.
Don't underestimate China's imperialistic tendencies.I'm not sure about China threat. But US/Russian cooperation would help both countries and significantly ease up confrontation in the world. Watch how efficiently American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts work together! That could be a great example for the politicians. Unfortunately, not with the current clown in the White House....Actually it is high time to scrap NATO and build a U.S.-Russian alliance to counter balance the China threat.
Can somebody tell me what's the U.S. interest in keeping NATO afloat? the EU has appr. 500 million inhabitants, Russia has Appr. 300 million. Both are highly developed militarily. EU should stand for itself. What do we get from the EU? Nothing. We just spend a lot on NATO. What could we get from a Russian trade? Since Russia has vast untapped natural resources (attractive for China, no?) we both could benefit tremendously.
JS, this isn't about Syria, as I believe you actually know. This is about EGO, POWER, and embarrassing the hell out of your opponent every chance you get. Leaders who have mutual respect do not try to 'pants' the other in public, but Putin has done so and continues to do so every chance he gets to Obama and Kerry.
Iran's huge public display of showing the pictures and numerous videos of captured US sailors, of giving his military members involved medals, etc is the same thing. We aren't going to war over that, but it's embarrassing as hell.
NO ONE has respect for this country anymore, not even our allies.
My mistake.. I recalled the number from the time of U.S.S.R.Russia has 300 million of what exactly?
