Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You never offered a viable argument.Concentrate, dear. How do you address the absurdities of Ark tales?Focus Hollie. How did I get blue eyes from the African, DNA Eve?
List those things that you believe are "absurd."
1) Prior to the flood what we know of as "continents" today were connected as one, large landmass. The overall climate was mild and evenly distributed so all animals were accessible and likely local.
2) God is considered supernatural and all powerful. He could easily have aided Noah in locating "two of every living flesh."
3) Noah likely collected very young animals that didn't require as much to eat and took up less space on the ark.
4) Many animals hibernate so it's possible that many hibernated during the massive storm which would have required less food storage.
Also, please explain how Mammoths have been found in the arctic regions with buttercups in their mouths and why sharks' teeth have been found atop high mountains.Concentrate, dear. How do you address the absurdities of Ark tales?Focus Hollie. How did I get blue eyes from the African, DNA Eve?
List those things that you believe are "absurd."
1) Prior to the flood what we know of as "continents" today were connected as one, large landmass. The overall climate was mild and evenly distributed so all animals were accessible and likely local.
2) God is considered supernatural and all powerful. He could easily have aided Noah in locating "two of every living flesh."
3) Noah likely collected very young animals that didn't require as much to eat and took up less space on the ark.
4) Many animals hibernate so it's possible that many hibernated during the massive storm which would have required less food storage.
Also, please explain how Mammoths have been found in the arctic regions with buttercups in their mouths and why sharks' teeth have been found atop high mountains.
1) Nonsense. Less than 6.000 years ago, the continents were clearly not one large landmass.
2) Well yeah, when your arguments are resolve to unsupportable conclusions deriving from "it's magic", it's convenient to invoke supernaturalism.
3) Nonsense. AIG preys upon the gullible and the ignorant. Don't assume that others will accept such appeals to fear and ignorance.
4) Nonsense. The cult of AIG has an interest in promoting those absurdities but don't expect others to blindly accept such cult propaganda.
If you had ever taken a 7th grade course in geology/earth science, you would understand why, for example, sea shells are found in the desert.
You fundamentalists are a scary lot.
So no viable arguments. Thanks for trying.
I have to admit.......for a brainless twit, you're certainly consistent........Come on fundie man.....what do they tell you at Harun Yahya?...... tell us about a 6,000 year old earth.....come on Hollie.......what did life crawl out of?......tell us what you believe in.......Tell me, then. What are they telling you at Harun Yahya?tell me then, what do you believe life crawled out of?.....Clearly, you should not argue against evolution because you understand nothing of. Your repeated "mud puddles" theory suggests you're spending way too much time at Harun Yahya.I've never argued against evolution......I've argued against the silly things that folks like you pretend it proves, such as human beings and mushrooms having common ancestors......or life crawling out of mud puddles.....
Typically pointless.I have to admit.......for a brainless twit, you're certainly consistent........Come on fundie man.....what do they tell you at Harun Yahya?...... tell us about a 6,000 year old earth.....come on Hollie.......what did life crawl out of?......tell us what you believe in.......Tell me, then. What are they telling you at Harun Yahya?tell me then, what do you believe life crawled out of?.....Clearly, you should not argue against evolution because you understand nothing of. Your repeated "mud puddles" theory suggests you're spending way too much time at Harun Yahya.
"natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10“These were the sons of Ham, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands and in their nations.
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17“And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings”
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
So you're admitting that the bible is fiction? The world being made in 6 days and then god needing a rest doesn't make sense either. Neither does your god dying on a cross with his shlong hanging out....Somewhere in our history, yes all our histories, there was an event which is described in the Bible. God wrote a description of the event in the terms he choose. So is the story of Noah and the flood literal? Yes. Does it describe elephants and giraffes and hippos, et. al., walking across a wooden plank in the rain? No. Unfortunately people who stop trying to understand God when the story does not make sense understand the word of God just as well as those who stop trying to understand God when the story does make sense. After all, the story of Noah makes no sense. God knew it would make no sense to us but put it in his book anyway.Yes. And I want to know whether the bible is just made up stuff or really the word of god written down by men and edited several times. So if there were 8 people on the Ark, Noah, his wife and two children, which leaves 4 other people to safeguard Asians, blacks, pigmies, eskimos, indians, bush people and all the other different kinds of people that we now have on earth. What say ye?The Bible is a tool for understanding God. Is that what you are indeed seeking to do?If there was a flood and Noah didn't have any asians or blacks on his boat, where did all the asians and blacks come from?
(For Bible translations this page is very helpful for understanding differences between versions: Bible Translation Guide Mardel )
"natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
"natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution Difference Between Adaptation vs Evolution
Summary:
1. All living things change through time in order to survive in their environment.
2. Adaptation involves short-term changes to suit the habitat and environment.
3. Evolution is a long-term process wherein changes occur in the genetic level for a better functioning and survival as a race.
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
It is proven science."natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution Difference Between Adaptation vs Evolution
Summary:
1. All living things change through time in order to survive in their environment.
2. Adaptation involves short-term changes to suit the habitat and environment.
3. Evolution is a long-term process wherein changes occur in the genetic level for a better functioning and survival as a race.
Evolution is based upon circular reasoning and cannot be proven science.
code for "I have nothing intelligent to add so I'll just say '6000 years' and hope no one notices"......1) Nonsense. Less than 6.000 years ago, the continents were clearly not one large landmass.
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
after the last person drowned, was it necessary that it continue to rain until Mt. Everest was submerged?......
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
after the last person drowned, was it necessary that it continue to rain until Mt. Everest was submerged?......
Mt. Everest was never submerged by the biblical flood.
While it will conflict with your YEC'ist dogma, it's just foolish for you to believe that that there was only a single large land mass less than 6,000 years ago.code for "I have nothing intelligent to add so I'll just say '6000 years' and hope no one notices"......1) Nonsense. Less than 6.000 years ago, the continents were clearly not one large landmass.
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
after the last person drowned, was it necessary that it continue to rain until Mt. Everest was submerged?......
Mt. Everest was never submerged by the biblical flood.
well there's something we can agree on at least.....
It is proven science."natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution Difference Between Adaptation vs Evolution
Summary:
1. All living things change through time in order to survive in their environment.
2. Adaptation involves short-term changes to suit the habitat and environment.
3. Evolution is a long-term process wherein changes occur in the genetic level for a better functioning and survival as a race.
Evolution is based upon circular reasoning and cannot be proven science.
Im sure it's a waste of time trying to educate religious zealots, but start here:It is proven science."natural adaptation", you mean evolution?The different races came through time by natural adaptation from the three sons of Noah who went in different directions. The Bible explicitly states that all humanity are the descendants of Noah through his three sons.
Gen 9:18-19 “Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.”
The account of Genesis 11 is found in Genesis 10. Gen 10:1 Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood.
Gen 10:5: “From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.
Gen 10
Gen 10:31-32: “These were the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, in their lands, according to their nations. These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood.”
We can trace the genealogies of all the numerous races back in time-- This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. (Gen 11:10)
Different racial skin tones did not originate at the Tower of Babel,
There were two different exodus,' one from Noah's family and the other from those at the Tower of Babel. So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. (Gen 11:8)
The event at the Tower of Babel caused humanity to be scattered throughout the world; and as they went to different parts of the world different factors came into place. Environmental adaptation and the passing on of acquired genetic characteristics effected different racial skin tones.
Acts 17
The different races came through time by natural adaptation from thethree sons of Noah who went in different directions
Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution Difference Between Adaptation vs Evolution
Summary:
1. All living things change through time in order to survive in their environment.
2. Adaptation involves short-term changes to suit the habitat and environment.
3. Evolution is a long-term process wherein changes occur in the genetic level for a better functioning and survival as a race.
Evolution is based upon circular reasoning and cannot be proven science.
Prove it.
lol.....you're worried about earth history when you can't even keep up with thread history?.....only in your faulty imagination will you find me believing in a single land mass within the last 6000 years.....of course, you know that....its just that you cannot bring yourself to engage honestly in any debate......While it will conflict with your YEC'ist dogma, it's just foolish for you to believe that that there was only a single large land mass less than 6,000 years ago.code for "I have nothing intelligent to add so I'll just say '6000 years' and hope no one notices"......1) Nonsense. Less than 6.000 years ago, the continents were clearly not one large landmass.
Don't let your hurt feelings prevent you from learning some factual earth history.
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
after the last person drowned, was it necessary that it continue to rain until Mt. Everest was submerged?......
Mt. Everest was never submerged by the biblical flood.
well there's something we can agree on at least.....
There was no biblical flood. Kick, scream, stomp your feet all you want. The biblical flood tale, like so many tales and fables, "miracles", etc., are utterly absent substantiation.
Anyone ever think of the rain. To have enough water to cover the entire earth (29,055 ft), the rate at which it would fall in 40 days and 40 nights would be so hard that it would kill every living thing. And what about the plants and trees that need photosynthesis. And what about the aquatic creatures, some can only survive in fresh water, some only in salt water. What about the food for the animals, do you know how much food each animal eats in a year. Some animals will only digest only certain types of "local" diets. The waste alone would keeps hundreds of people round the clock on poop scoop detail. Also the temperature at that level (29,055 ft) will be freezing and kill off most animals, the level of oygen will be at least 30% lower and if all trees are completely buried under the water say goodbye to all life on land. Also what about...???????
For entertainment purposes only
after the last person drowned, was it necessary that it continue to rain until Mt. Everest was submerged?......
Mt. Everest was never submerged by the biblical flood.
well there's something we can agree on at least.....
There was no biblical flood. Kick, scream, stomp your feet all you want. The biblical flood tale, like so many tales and fables, "miracles", etc., are utterly absent substantiation.
and yet, it is remembered by nearly every culture in the world, regardless of religion.....does that not strike you as odd, given your denial?.........
lol... you don't understand earth history which is why you're having difficulty with challenges to your biblical flood tales.... only in fundamentalist Christian apologetics are Ark tales looked upon as a true rendering of earth history.... yet you cannot bring yourself to actually try and refute the evidence dismissing such Ark tales as nonsense....lol.....you're worried about earth history when you can't even keep up with thread history?.....only in your faulty imagination will you find me believing in a single land mass within the last 6000 years.....of course, you know that....its just that you cannot bring yourself to engage honestly in any debate......While it will conflict with your YEC'ist dogma, it's just foolish for you to believe that that there was only a single large land mass less than 6,000 years ago.code for "I have nothing intelligent to add so I'll just say '6000 years' and hope no one notices"......1) Nonsense. Less than 6.000 years ago, the continents were clearly not one large landmass.
Don't let your hurt feelings prevent you from learning some factual earth history.
