Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
What you don't realize, by the law, she would have had to been 19 to confer citizenship had he been born outside the US. That would have been 5 years after her 14th birthday.
Yup. But that wasn't the claim I was discussing or disputing.
Nor is it remotely relevant, as Hawaii isn't outside the US. But inside.
I keep trying to figure out what you could possibly be getting from the Democrats that would make it worth sounding like such an utter, laughable flatliner in public with no apparent shame whatsoever, and I just can't even imagine.
Whatever the compensation, let me just congratulate you on how thoroughly you're earning it.
I'm curious what it is about your ilk that makes you abandon a conversation about the facts and evidence.....and flee desperately into ad hominem fallacies. While abandoning their every point.
You won't touch your blunder in claiming that Obama's mother was 17 when he was born (she was 18). You won't discuss the irrelevance of his mother's age to his citizenship, as he was born in Hawaii. You won't touch how no president has ever voluntarily released their college transcripts.
It apparently doesn't take much to make you abandon your every argument.
Actually her age was my mistake, not Cecilie's. Do try to keep up.
Which Cecile agreed with. So its her blunder too.
See how that works?
No, fucknut, I didn't. I agreed there were irregularities that needed addressing, and declined to get into discussing them in detail, and you heard, "Cecilie has produced the argument that I wanted to argue against!!! ATTACK!!!!!"