R-W'ers' hatred of Obama unabated even in his last year in office

The DOW and oil will have a rough week. Rough as it gets, the damage would be far worse in an unregulated free-market economy.
Well, as the opposition party isn't the Libertarians, that's not very relevant.
You are entitled to your opinion.
My opinion? Your pretense that the GOP is pushing an unregulated free-market economy as a policy is a strawman. I am not surprised that you don't even try to defend it. I've taught you that I won't let you get away with shit.
That is what you said, not me. You have learned that I will educate you and not let you twist words. Once again you are wrong.


You brought up an "unregulated free market economy" in the context of a thread about RWers.

I'm not twisting shit, you dishonest prick.
 
The DOW is going to have a rough week. Yes.

If it were an unregulated free market economy, it would be far worse. Yes.

That's what I said, Correll, it is true, and there is nothing you can say to twist it wrong.

And it's not relevant, because no one is pushing for an "unregulated free market economy".

So, why did you bring it up?
 
It isn't hate, it's disgust.


"Disgust" is a defense mechanism when you cannot define the reasons for the hatred.


I've defined it quite well.

And my explanation explains the "hatred" for both Clinton too, despite their being white.
Not, it has not, it will not, and it has been explained to you. So, no, you don't get "just once more."


Obama was treated just like Bill and HIllary, because of the same old partisan and ideological reasons.

You agreed with that. YOu words were "obama kicked far right ass and laughed about it".

Being angry about getting your "ass kicked" and having it rubbed in with "laughter" is not "latent racism".

It is partisanship and ideology.

But you can't give up the Race Card.

LIbs. All the intellectual Honestly of a crack whore.
And you, once again, left out my true comment about far right racism. Look at all the posters on our Board who hate him because he is black.

There is no where, Correll, that you can hide from the truth.


You think that if the Far Right got it's "Ass kicked" by some white person that "laughed" about it that they would react differently?

You can look at Bill Clinton and see the answer to that.

Yet, you libs need to make it about Race, so as to marginalize any criticism.

The "hatred" of Obama is partisan and ideological and you libs are being assholes when you insist it is racism.
 
My comment on the dow was in reply to andaronjim's comment on the page before, so it is in context of this thread. And I did not say anyone was suggesting an "unregulated freemarket economy."

One, you were out of the flow of the conversation.

Two, you are making accusations that are not founded in the thread.

Three, yes, Obama is hated because of his race and how he has laughed at the GOP's far right wing.

Four, you are not a mainstream Republican, just one of the silly far right ideologues.

All those statements are true.
 
It isn't hate, it's disgust.


"Disgust" is a defense mechanism when you cannot define the reasons for the hatred.


I've defined it quite well.

And my explanation explains the "hatred" for both Clinton too, despite their being white.
Not, it has not, it will not, and it has been explained to you. So, no, you don't get "just once more."


Obama was treated just like Bill and HIllary, because of the same old partisan and ideological reasons.

You agreed with that. YOu words were "obama kicked far right ass and laughed about it".

Being angry about getting your "ass kicked" and having it rubbed in with "laughter" is not "latent racism".

It is partisanship and ideology.

But you can't give up the Race Card.

LIbs. All the intellectual Honestly of a crack whore.
And you, once again, left out my true comment about far right racism. Look at all the posters on our Board who hate him because he is black.

There is no where, Correll, that you can hide from the truth.
If race was the issue, I wouldn't have been a supporter in 2009.
 
"Disgust" is a defense mechanism when you cannot define the reasons for the hatred.


I've defined it quite well.

And my explanation explains the "hatred" for both Clinton too, despite their being white.
Not, it has not, it will not, and it has been explained to you. So, no, you don't get "just once more."


Obama was treated just like Bill and HIllary, because of the same old partisan and ideological reasons.

You agreed with that. YOu words were "obama kicked far right ass and laughed about it".

Being angry about getting your "ass kicked" and having it rubbed in with "laughter" is not "latent racism".

It is partisanship and ideology.

But you can't give up the Race Card.

LIbs. All the intellectual Honestly of a crack whore.
And you, once again, left out my true comment about far right racism. Look at all the posters on our Board who hate him because he is black.

There is no where, Correll, that you can hide from the truth.
If race was the issue, I wouldn't have been a supporter in 2009.
Good for you. It should never be about race, white or black or whatever.
 
My comment on the dow was in reply to andaronjim's comment on the page before, so it is in context of this thread. And I did not say anyone was suggesting an "unregulated freemarket economy."

One, you were out of the flow of the conversation.

Two, you are making accusations that are not founded in the thread.

Three, yes, Obama is hated because of his race and how he has laughed at the GOP's far right wing.

Four, you are not a mainstream Republican, just one of the silly far right ideologues.

All those statements are true.




Obama has been treated and "hated" that same as the white Bill Clinton and the WHite HIllary Clinton.

Your assumption that it is because of his Race is unfounded and clashes with the fact that he has been treated the same as Bill and HIllary, two white people.

YOur avoidance of this simple fact is you being intellectually dishonest.

Your claim that this has been addressed is "True" in that you libs have made several statements disagreeing with it.

But never with any rational explanation for said disagreement.


Because there is not one.

Obama has been treated just like any democratic President would be by his partisan and ideological enemies in a time of deep partisan and ideological bitterness.
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.


You've called me a "far right ideologue", but refuse to consider that my "hatred" of Obama might be based on partisanship and ideology.
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.


You've called me a "far right ideologue", but refuse to consider that my "hatred" of Obama might be based on partisanship and ideology.
Yours may be, yes, but for many on the far right go beyond that to the fact he is black. We see that daily on this Board.
 
The DOW is going to have a rough week. Yes.

If it were an unregulated free market economy, it would be far worse. Yes.

That's what I said, Correll, it is true, and there is nothing you can say to twist it wrong.

How would an unregulated economy cause problems as a result of a low price for oil?
 
The DOW is going to have a rough week. Yes.

If it were an unregulated free market economy, it would be far worse. Yes.

That's what I said, Correll, it is true, and there is nothing you can say to twist it wrong.

And it's not relevant, because no one is pushing for an "unregulated free market economy".

So, why did you bring it up?

Actually, some of us are pushing for that, but most Republicans aren't, and none of the candidates are.
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.

You're just another leftwing asshole who accuses all Republicans of being racist. No one is falling for that scam any longer.
 
No one is falling for that scam any longer.


That quip reminds of of the great philosopher, Yogi Berra when he stated,
"That restaurant is so crowded, that no one goes there anymore."
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.


You've called me a "far right ideologue", but refuse to consider that my "hatred" of Obama might be based on partisanship and ideology.
Yours may be, yes, but for many on the far right go beyond that to the fact he is black. We see that daily on this Board.

Thank you for that much.

But, you often have accused me of being "Racialist".

How do you can you be sure which ones and how many are partisan and/or ideologues instead of racist?
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.


You've called me a "far right ideologue", but refuse to consider that my "hatred" of Obama might be based on partisanship and ideology.
Yours may be, yes, but for many on the far right go beyond that to the fact he is black. We see that daily on this Board.

Thank you for that much.

But, you often have accused me of being "Racialist".

How do you can you be sure which ones and how many are partisan and/or ideologues instead of racist?


racist works better for them, don't expect any changes.
 
No one is falling for that scam any longer.


That quip reminds of of the great philosopher, Yogi Berra when he stated,
"That restaurant is so crowded, that no one goes there anymore."

You remind me of someone with brain damage.

It is insane.

They can remember us cons being just as opposed to Bill Clinton as we are to Obama.

But somehow, the same behavior today is because of Race.

They know that if Hillary wins, that we will be just as opposed to Hillary as we were to Bill and ARE to Obama.

BUt somehow the fact that the same behavior with each and every Democrat, with this particular democrat, has a different reason.

And they can say this with a straight face, and defend it despite having their contradictions rubbed in their faces.
 
You are wrong, Correll, and you know it to even suggest that race has nothing to with the far right's hatred of Obama.

That is dishonest, but that is what you do because you can't argue the facts.


You've called me a "far right ideologue", but refuse to consider that my "hatred" of Obama might be based on partisanship and ideology.
Yours may be, yes, but for many on the far right go beyond that to the fact he is black. We see that daily on this Board.

Thank you for that much.

But, you often have accused me of being "Racialist".

How do you can you be sure which ones and how many are partisan and/or ideologues instead of racist?


racist works better for them, don't expect any changes.

I don't. Not from them at least.
 
It is insane.

They can remember us cons being just as opposed to Bill Clinton as we are to Obama.

But somehow, the same behavior today is because of Race.

They know that if Hillary wins, that we will be just as opposed to Hillary as we were to Bill and ARE to Obama.


What's really "insane"....Is, that by your own admission, you probably hate everybody that has a "D" after their names.....which makes you a mindless, ultra-partisan hack......Glad we got that label properly applied.
 

Forum List

Back
Top