Remember How Important And Valuable American Lives Were During the Benghazi Hoax?

"As a COVID-19 coronavirus disease pandemic spread throughout the world in early 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) urged countries to “test, test, test” for the virus in order to stop it from spreading. WHO officials said the global health organization had provided 1.5 million tests to 120 countries.

“You cannot fight a fire blindfolded,” said WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus during a March 16 press conference. “And we cannot stop this pandemic if we don’t know who is infected.”

Those tests were AVAILABLE had Trump asked for them

He did not. He instead tried to re-invent the wheel and design new tests that failed spectacularly

March 28th:

SEOUL (Reuters) – Three Korean coronavirus test-kit makers have won preliminary approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), paving the way for kits to be exported to the United States to help it battle the largest outbreak of the virus.

South Korea’s foreign ministry said that winning the preliminary approval under emergency use authorization will allow the products to be sold in the United States.

The ministry did not name the manufacturers or give a time frame in its statement.

U.S. President Donald Trump this week asked his Korean counterpart to supply the medical devices and promised to help Korean firms gain U.S. regulator approval.

A massive testing campaign, coupled with intensive contact tracing, is credited with helping South Korea slow the spread of the disease, whereas the United States has been criticized for a slow response to the virus.

The approval is expected to speed up the ability to test patients in the United States, where critics say the rolling out of tests has been too slow.


Swiss firm Roche has also won Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA for its test kits.


So it was Trump, and not the FDA??? March 28th was a little over two weeks ago.
March 28?

Those are not the tests that SK used.

They had their first virus death the day we did and they IMMEDIATELY began aggressive testing.

Well before March 28

Yes they did, and it's the FDA that held up the process--not Trump.
 
Wait...you blamed the CDC and now that you realize that they were headed by a Trump appointee you backtrack?

You're too transparent.

Oh and thanks for pointing out that even though Trump recognized the seriousness of the virus WAYYYY back in January,,,he didn't order tests until TWO MONTHS LATER

Two weeks ago.

Wonder when we'll get em huh?
 
The only Benghazi hoax was when Susan Rice went on Sunday morning talk show circuit lying about the attack.
Liar. :eusa_liar:
Fuck off. Your head is so far up Obama's ass that you should change your avatar to Lemmiwinks.
You lied, deal with it. Susan Rice did not lie on those Sunday morning talk shows. Deal with that too.

:dance:
Bullshit.



There was no fucking protest outside the compound. It was a pre-planned coordinated al Qaeda attack.

She flat out lied about it because the facts belied Obama's expensive campaign ads saying that he had decimated al Qaeda.
 
The only Benghazi hoax was when Susan Rice went on Sunday morning talk show circuit lying about the attack.
Liar. :eusa_liar:
Fuck off. Your head is so far up Obama's ass that you should change your avatar to Lemmiwinks.
You lied, deal with it. Susan Rice did not lie on those Sunday morning talk shows. Deal with that too.

:dance:
Bullshit.



There was no fucking protest outside the compound. It was a pre-planned coordinated al Qaeda attack.

She flat out lied about it because the facts belied Obama's expensive campaign ads saying that he had decimated al Qaeda.

Shitstain, this was thoroughly investigated by the GOP. Eight fucking times, in fact. And they concluded Susan Rice did not lie. They concluded the CIA determined it was a protest over a video. They also concluded it was the CIA who obtained additional information leading them to change their assessment to it being a terrorist attack two days after Susan Rice appeared on that show you linked.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.
 
The only Benghazi hoax was when Susan Rice went on Sunday morning talk show circuit lying about the attack.
Liar. :eusa_liar:
Fuck off. Your head is so far up Obama's ass that you should change your avatar to Lemmiwinks.
You lied, deal with it. Susan Rice did not lie on those Sunday morning talk shows. Deal with that too.

:dance:
Bullshit.



There was no fucking protest outside the compound. It was a pre-planned coordinated al Qaeda attack.

She flat out lied about it because the facts belied Obama's expensive campaign ads saying that he had decimated al Qaeda.

Shitstain, this was thoroughly investigated by the GOP. Eight fucking times, in fact. And they concluded Susan Rice did not lie. They concluded the CIA determined it was a protest over a video. They also concluded it was the CIA who obtained additional information leading them to change their assessment to it being a terrorist attack two days after Susan Rice appeared on that show you linked.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

Bullshit. She went on a damage control mission to lie, lie and lie to the American people.

You're an easily brainwashed idiot.
 
The only Benghazi hoax was when Susan Rice went on Sunday morning talk show circuit lying about the attack.
Liar. :eusa_liar:
Fuck off. Your head is so far up Obama's ass that you should change your avatar to Lemmiwinks.
You lied, deal with it. Susan Rice did not lie on those Sunday morning talk shows. Deal with that too.

:dance:
Bullshit.



There was no fucking protest outside the compound. It was a pre-planned coordinated al Qaeda attack.

She flat out lied about it because the facts belied Obama's expensive campaign ads saying that he had decimated al Qaeda.

Shitstain, this was thoroughly investigated by the GOP. Eight fucking times, in fact. And they concluded Susan Rice did not lie. They concluded the CIA determined it was a protest over a video. They also concluded it was the CIA who obtained additional information leading them to change their assessment to it being a terrorist attack two days after Susan Rice appeared on that show you linked.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

Bullshit. She went on a damage control mission to lie, lie and lie to the American people.

You're an easily brainwashed idiot.

LOLOL

You fucking retard. :cuckoo:

I posted directly from the GOP-led House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report.

They investigated the matter and the GOP-led House, trying to find dirt on Hillary and Obama, were forced to conclude Susan Rice didn't lie.

You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

:dance:
 
"As a COVID-19 coronavirus disease pandemic spread throughout the world in early 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) urged countries to “test, test, test” for the virus in order to stop it from spreading. WHO officials said the global health organization had provided 1.5 million tests to 120 countries.

“You cannot fight a fire blindfolded,” said WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus during a March 16 press conference. “And we cannot stop this pandemic if we don’t know who is infected.”

Those tests were AVAILABLE had Trump asked for them

He did not. He instead tried to re-invent the wheel and design new tests that failed spectacularly

Please start to do even the least amount of your own research. Proving you wrong gets very old.

Biden falsely says Trump administration rejected WHO coronavirus test kits (that were never offered)
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT
  • The WHO never offered to sell test kits to the United States.
  • The CDC opted to develop its own coronavirus test and did not use the WHO’s protocol for the test.
  • Other developed countries with advanced research capabilities developed their own tests.
 
LOLOL

You fucking retard. :cuckoo:

I posted directly from the GOP-led House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report.

They investigated the matter and the GOP-led House, trying to find dirt on Hillary and Obama, were forced to conclude Susan Rice didn't lie.

You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

:dance:

Yes, deal with it!
1586935563374.png


Did, or did not Susan Rice appear on all FIVE Sunday News shows saying this?



BENGHAZI REPORT: State Department employees reacted in shock to Susan Rice's first TV appearances
Pamela Engel
Jun 28, 2016, 9:48 AM
Susan Rice. Reuters

State Department employees were surprised to see then UN Ambassador Susan Rice appear on Sunday talk shows in 2012 blaming the attacks on a diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, on an internet video, a report released Tuesday revealed.

Rice's comments were "met with shock and disbelief by State Department employees" who worried about White House involvement in the way the attack was being characterized to the American public, according to the report released by the Republican-led House Select Committee on Benghazi.

 
LOLOL

You fucking retard. :cuckoo:

I posted directly from the GOP-led House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report.

They investigated the matter and the GOP-led House, trying to find dirt on Hillary and Obama, were forced to conclude Susan Rice didn't lie.

You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

:dance:

Yes, deal with it! View attachment 323651

Did, or did not Susan Rice appear on all FIVE Sunday News shows saying this?



BENGHAZI REPORT: State Department employees reacted in shock to Susan Rice's first TV appearances
Pamela Engel
Jun 28, 2016, 9:48 AM
Susan Rice. Reuters

State Department employees were surprised to see then UN Ambassador Susan Rice appear on Sunday talk shows in 2012 blaming the attacks on a diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, on an internet video, a report released Tuesday revealed.

Rice's comments were "met with shock and disbelief by State Department employees" who worried about White House involvement in the way the attack was being characterized to the American public, according to the report released by the Republican-led House Select Committee on Benghazi.


Exactly how retarded are you con freaks?

Who denied she said what she said on those shows?

So why do you persist on pretending as though someone denied it?

Meanwhile, it appears you too are illiterate and incapable of comprehending the GOP-led House investigation concluded she said that because that's what the CIA believed occurred until more evidence surfaced proving it was a terrorist attack; which the CIA determined 2 days after Susan Rice appeared on those shows.

Grow a fucking brain.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
What gets lost is more than 30 people were saved and it is barely mentioned. I would suspect that they are grateful that they were rescued. There is a heroic story of the defenders who fought on the ground during this ordeal and died fighting as hero's.
So, why the bullshit about the internet video, the failure to act when it was clear we had resources to rescue the ambassador, and why keep all communications about the incident on a private server to avoid congressional oversight and delete 33,000 emails to hide it all?

Did that get lost too?

.


Because real time is not a movie and happy endings are nice but it this is reality we live in

It was clear we had resources to rescue - that is an opinion and cannot be proven to be a fact.

According to the timeline the attack started about 3;40 OR 4:15. They gain access to the compound interior at least by 4;15 or earlier and they WERE ALREADY IN THE COMPOUND. They were inside the compound in 15 minutes. You seem to think that they could have been rescued in that short time span when it does take time to access the danger and respond appropriate. Live is not a movie.

4:45 a team assigned to the embassy tried to retake the compound

5:20 the compound was secured. So in a less than 2 hours they were at least 2 deaths and the Stevens was hurt.

the House Select Committee's report explains: "The assets ultimately deployed by the Defense Department in response to the Benghazi attacks were not positioned to arrive before the final lethal attack."



Quote - why the bullshit about the internet video

well if your talking about the Muslim video well they were wrong in that sense. but still it was after the fact and the situation was over. It does not prove intent, it just shows that they really didn't know and was making their statements told to them . It was during the investigation by the house that it showed that they relied on what was told to them by CIA assessments.

Quote - and why keep all communications about the incident on a private server to avoid congressional oversight and delete 33,000 emails to hide it all?

The committee, for its investigation, asked the State Department to turn over emails Clinton had sent to her aides about the attack.

They were turned over and some of those emails turned out to have been sent from Clinton's private email account . She released the email when asked. This is probably why the private email server becomes known and used against her during her run for president. Your getting your conspiracies mixed up.

the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks

the administration did make two mistakes. First, the State Department failed to provide sufficient security at Benghazi, which an internal review blamed on "systemic failures" at the department’s "senior levels." Second, Obama administration officials initially mischaracterized how the attack began (more on this below), but investigations found they were honestly relaying the CIA's assessments, not deliberately lying, as Republicans charged.

"Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee, what are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping," McCarthy said on Fox News. About a week later, amid controversy over his comments, McCarthy dropped out of the race to be speaker.

Thus proving that it really was the original witch hunt and address that they knew she would run and wanted to make unfounded accusations. Such a statement after the report was released which exonerated her but was unacceptable for repubs. But they had what they needed for the next phase.

Did you actually pay attention during the Benghazi investigations, Kilroy? From your post it doesn't appear so.

Your description of how Clinton responded to inquiries by Congressional investigators is laughable! She didn't hand over thousands of emails dealing with Benghazi although she told Congress and the American people that she'd complied fully with their requests! She couldn't! How could she turn over emails originating from the secret servers she'd hidden at her home? To do so would expose the pay for play scheme she was running at State! When Congress started asking questions about Benghazi Clinton's response was to pay professionals to "bleach" her two hard drives to destroy whatever was on them!

This is how the repub found
 
Exactly how retarded are you con freaks?

Who denied she said what she said on those shows?

So why do you persist on pretending as though someone denied it?

Meanwhile, it appears you too are illiterate and incapable of comprehending the GOP-led House investigation concluded she said that because that's what the CIA believed occurred until more evidence surfaced proving it was a terrorist attack; which the CIA determined 2 days after Susan Rice appeared on those shows.

Grow a fucking brain.
icon_rolleyes.gif

As you know, it was well known that the attack was not the result of a film strip.

Hillary told daughter Chelsea that an 'Al-Qaeda-like group' carried out the Benghazi attack in an email sent the night of the deadly consulate assault
  • Hillary Clinton told her daughter that that two officers had been killed, and attributed the attack to an Al-Qaeda group
  • But the Obama Administration later described it as a spontaneous protest
  • The emails also revealed Chelsea's response to her mother's message
  • Clinton's emails were addressed to Diane Reynolds, an alias that Chelsea Clinton used
  • Hillary Clinton said on Sunday that the FBI has not contacted her about its probe into her private email server
  • For more on Clinton's email scandal visit www.dailymail.co.uk/hillary
By KELLY MCLAUGHLIN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 18:25 EDT, 17 January 2016 | UPDATED: 02:46 EDT, 18 January 2016

Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea the night of the Benghazi attacks in which she claimed an 'Al-Qaeda-like group' carried out the assault, it has been revealed.

 
Your Quote - She didn't hand over thousands of emails dealing with Benghazi although she told Congress and the American people that she'd complied fully with their requests!

H. Rept. 114-848 - FINAL REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE EVENTS SURROUNDING THE 2012 TERRORIST ATTACK IN BENGHAZI114th Congress (2015-2016)


Thousand of emails that was dealing with Benghazi. get real show the proof of that. Why would she need thousand of emails to discuss this matter and who was getting all these emails. This is why you guy are hung up on falsehood because Fox and bloggers say it so and you believe it.

She released the emails pertaining to Benghazi. Yet in 2016 Gowdy was still demanding her emails and the emails of her associates. It was more a fishing expedition to determine how she was using a private email servers so that it could be used against her in an election. It no longer was about Benghazi but the private emails.

Like Secretaries of State before her, Secretary Clinton
at times used her own electronic mail account when
engaging with other officials. On matters pertaining to
the conduct of government business, it was her practice
to use the officials' government electronic mail
accounts.
Accordingly, to the extent the Department
retains records of government electronic mail accounts,
it already has records of her electronic mail during
her tenure preserved within the Department's record
keeping systems.\245\

once she left office they became government property and the State Dept has to turn them over to the Congress when ordered to do so

With respect to any emails from Secretary Clinton's
`[email protected]' account, I respond by
stating that, for the reasons set forth below, the
Department of State--which has already produced
approximately 300 documents in response to an earlier
request seeking documents on essentially the same
subject matters


Its like Gowdy could not accept that , so he got the state department to get emails from associates email accounts.

well bottom line there were 8 email related to Benghazi that clinton sent. if he wanted to delve into all the emails related to other matters. Good luck with that. The State could only turnover what was on their servers when Clinton used it.


Neither the State Department nor the
Committee could verify no work-related emails were deleted by
the Secretary's attorneys or that all of her emails related to
Benghazi and Libya were actually produced to the Committee.


Nobody knows but Clinton and the company she hired knows how many emails were related to Benghazi. She said she turned it all over. IF you disagree it still just speculation as you really don't know. She could turn over 100 emails and repubs would not be satisfied and believe there must be more. But she was SOS and there were other topics that she had to deal with. This was not under the preview of the Benghazi hearing.


You can't and You won't because ultimately Clinton was able to determine which email related to Benghazi and turned them over. She did not turn over every email on the server on things that did no apply to Benghazi

But this is what happens when you start mixing up your conspiracy theories. It becomes one big pile of whatever.


She told Congress that she complied and they did not say anything or force her to comply

You got to love repub logic - spent to much time watch Fox and right wing media with the expectation that they do not lie

Furthermore, the
State Department withheld documents, telling the Committee ``a
small number of documents implicate important Executive Branch
institutional interests and are therefore not included in this
production.''\95\ The State Department's continued refusal to
produce relevant documents delayed the Committee's interview
schedule.



MAGA is a play on Ronald Regan who first used Make America Great in one of his speeches. Typical Trump tweaking and he wants to copyright it and make it his own.
 
The only Benghazi hoax was when Susan Rice went on Sunday morning talk show circuit lying about the attack.
Liar. :eusa_liar:
Fuck off. Your head is so far up Obama's ass that you should change your avatar to Lemmiwinks.
You lied, deal with it. Susan Rice did not lie on those Sunday morning talk shows. Deal with that too.

:dance:
Bullshit.



There was no fucking protest outside the compound. It was a pre-planned coordinated al Qaeda attack.

She flat out lied about it because the facts belied Obama's expensive campaign ads saying that he had decimated al Qaeda.

Shitstain, this was thoroughly investigated by the GOP. Eight fucking times, in fact. And they concluded Susan Rice did not lie. They concluded the CIA determined it was a protest over a video. They also concluded it was the CIA who obtained additional information leading them to change their assessment to it being a terrorist attack two days after Susan Rice appeared on that show you linked.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


You lied. :eusa_liar:

Deal with it.

Exactly.

There was no lie.

It was if anything, "the fog of war"

And why all the outrage?

Since when does an incorrect assessment that comes out within hours of an event a four year "thing"?

Oh...when the opposing party wants to use those bodies for political purposes
 
Exactly how retarded are you con freaks?

Who denied she said what she said on those shows?

So why do you persist on pretending as though someone denied it?

Meanwhile, it appears you too are illiterate and incapable of comprehending the GOP-led House investigation concluded she said that because that's what the CIA believed occurred until more evidence surfaced proving it was a terrorist attack; which the CIA determined 2 days after Susan Rice appeared on those shows.

Grow a fucking brain.
icon_rolleyes.gif

As you know, it was well known that the attack was not the result of a film strip.

Hillary told daughter Chelsea that an 'Al-Qaeda-like group' carried out the Benghazi attack in an email sent the night of the deadly consulate assault
  • Hillary Clinton told her daughter that that two officers had been killed, and attributed the attack to an Al-Qaeda group
  • But the Obama Administration later described it as a spontaneous protest
  • The emails also revealed Chelsea's response to her mother's message
  • Clinton's emails were addressed to Diane Reynolds, an alias that Chelsea Clinton used
  • Hillary Clinton said on Sunday that the FBI has not contacted her about its probe into her private email server
  • For more on Clinton's email scandal visit www.dailymail.co.uk/hillary
By KELLY MCLAUGHLIN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 18:25 EDT, 17 January 2016 | UPDATED: 02:46 EDT, 18 January 2016

Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea the night of the Benghazi attacks in which she claimed an 'Al-Qaeda-like group' carried out the assault, it has been revealed.

Try reading what I posted for clarity, dumbass con. The Intel coming in that night was fluid. At first, the CIA thought it was a terrorist attack. That's when Hillary emailed Chelsea. Later that night, the CIA thought it was a protest over a video.
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
 

Forum List

Back
Top