Republican Greg Gianforte

[CrusaderFrank]

So, it's OK for Congresspeople like Pelosi, Boxer and Reid use their political office to reap literally hundreds of millions of dollars, but body slam a reporter....

 

[Rustic]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

While I do think he did the wrong thing, like I said before I have a hard time feeling sorry for shit stain liberal reporters though.

 

[Wry Catcher]

He won.
Get over it.
You'll have a chance to run Hillary against him in a few years. Hey, she's gotta run for everything if she expects to ever have a shot at winning anything!

Stupid ^^^ and one more example of the crazy right wing's hypocrisy.

 

[BluesLegend]

Gianforte what's the big deal, the reporter still has all his teeth he got off light.

 

[JBond]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

This is stupid. He wasn't a member of congress. Silly snowflakes. It's a matter for local law enforcement.

 

[Meathead]

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. No

FYI:
assault (also called attempted battery) is a threat or physical act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact, whereas battery is a physical act that results in that harmful or offensive contact.

The Penal Code in Montana divides assault into simple and aggravated: The former is a misdemeanor and the latter a felony. From the interview of the Fox News Reporter, she described the event as the latter, which best describes the candidates behavior, to wit:

"A person commits the offense of aggravated assault if the person purposely or knowingly causes serious bodily injury to another or purposely or knowingly, with the use of physical force or contact, causes reasonable apprehension of serious bodily injury or death in another."
Montana Title 45. Crimes § 45-5-202 | FindLaw

Stop being an obnoxious and pedantic twit. You asked 4 questions and I answered.

 

[JBond]

Was what he did wrong yes should he have been charged with a crime and have his day in court yes as he has been and will have. Is he a proper role model I don't know enough about his past to say and it would be unfair to judge his whole life based on this one incident. Has the media blown this incident way out of proportion yes.

IMO:

• He was charged with simple assault
• I suspect the prosecutor's office in most of America would upgrade the complaint to Battery
• The attack was tantamount to a sucker punch, if we are to believe the Fox Reporter who was only a few feet away when the event transpired. Police and little league coaches are held to a higher standard, why shouldn't a member of Congress too?

He wasn't a member of congress. It was up to the voters to act accordingly and they did.

To be fair, 90% of the vote was early, pre-body slam. He would have won with an even greater margin if all the votes were cast yesterday.

 

[Wry Catcher]

So, it's OK for Congresspeople like Pelosi, Boxer and Reid use their political office to reap literally hundreds of millions of dollars, but body slam a reporter....

Even for you Frank this non sequitur is ridiculous. BTW, this post ^^^ is more than a phrase and not even a sentence - I may need to modify my definition of an idiot-gram to include fragments of a sentence. In truth, it is one more idiot-gram to add to your resume.

 

[Doc1]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

Fuck off, you lost. The people of Montana have spoken.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

You can't treat people the way he did that reporter. Put on your big boy pants and don't assault reporters just because you don't like them. It's a horrible precedent.

 

[Doc1]

So, it's OK for Congresspeople like Pelosi, Boxer and Reid use their political office to reap literally hundreds of millions of dollars, but body slam a reporter....

Even for you Frank this non sequitur is ridiculous. BTW, this post ^^^ is more than a phrase and not even a sentence - I may need to modify my definition of an idiot-gram to include fragments of a sentence. In truth, it is one more idiot-gram to add to your resume.

Ainchu jus all smart and shit. Go somewhere else and teach, I'd bet you have a little dick and that you aren't the head of your household....hence you bully others.

 

[Markle]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

You appear to have forgotten or are attempting to ignore.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. No

FYI:
assault (also called attempted battery) is a threat or physical act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact, whereas battery is a physical act that results in that harmful or offensive contact.

The Penal Code in Montana divides assault into simple and aggravated: The former is a misdemeanor and the latter a felony. From the interview of the Fox News Reporter, she described the event as the latter, which best describes the candidates behavior, to wit:

"A person commits the offense of aggravated assault if the person purposely or knowingly causes serious bodily injury to another or purposely or knowingly, with the use of physical force or contact, causes reasonable apprehension of serious bodily injury or death in another."
Montana Title 45. Crimes § 45-5-202 | FindLaw

Stop being an obnoxious and pedantic twit. You asked 4 questions and I answered.

Of course you did. As a practicing liberal I feel I have a duty to edify the ignorant, knowing even as I do the willful type of ignorance is chronic and irreversible. You answered correctly two of the four questions, which at 50% barely = a "D". That 's good, for most of the crazy right wing I would expect and "F", as most of them think sucker punching is a right and no matter what a republican says or does should never be used against him.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

You appear to have forgotten or are attempting to ignore.

How about Dennis Hastert:
Dennis Hastert Sentencing Looms: What You Need to Know

Something a bit more timely, but I suppose you must have forgotten or chose to ignore. Note, two other Republicans are noted in the link below which you will not read. But that's the way of a willfully ignorant hypocrite:

Dennis Hastert Sentencing Looms: What You Need to Know

 

[BlindBoo]

1. No. The man is obviously unhinged and needs to seek help.
2. Depends on what the witnesses say and how much credibility they have.
3. Yes. He is a role model for the new violent face of the GOP. Ask them a non approved question and they will bodily attack you. Reporters beware. Question at your own risk!
4. Yes on the general principle that he is an asshole, but no. It will not change the makeup of the House. The next election will settle it.

 

[JBond]

Won.

Now, it's up to Ryan and the majority in the H. of Rep. to vote.

Art. 1, Sec 5, Clause 3, to wit:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its member for disorderly Behavior, and, with with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

Funny, Hillary was under multiple investifations for crimes, to include Espionage, turned out to have broken laws and jeopardized national security, and fought to keep her in the race.

Obama protected Democrats who broke laws - Hillary, Holder, Reid, Castro..

And after being unable to beat another Republican in another election, then and only then are Democrats concerned with holding someone accountable.

Why don't you want to hold Gianforte accountable?

What are you babbling about? He was given a citation and ordered to appear before a judge. Stop being a dumb ass.

 

[JBond]

1. No. The man is obviously unhinged and needs to seek help.
2. Depends on what the witnesses say and how much credibility they have.
3. Yes. He is a role model for the new violent face of the GOP. Ask them a non approved question and they will bodily attack you. Reporters beware. Question at your own risk!
4. Yes on the general principle that he is an asshole, but no. It will not change the makeup of the House. The next election will settle it.

Lol! Another snowflake that believes he is clever. Where are all your posts regarding Democrats blocking emergency services on roads and highways, and the multiple violent attacks on people with a different belief system?

 

[Meathead]

Questions:

1. Do you believe Gianforte was in the right when he physically attacked the reporter
2. Do you believe the attack, should be upgraded from simple assault by the Prosecutor
3. Do you feel Gianforte is a proper role model
4. Do you support a movement to invoke Art 1, sec 5 and clause 3

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. No

FYI:
assault (also called attempted battery) is a threat or physical act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact, whereas battery is a physical act that results in that harmful or offensive contact.

The Penal Code in Montana divides assault into simple and aggravated: The former is a misdemeanor and the latter a felony. From the interview of the Fox News Reporter, she described the event as the latter, which best describes the candidates behavior, to wit:

"A person commits the offense of aggravated assault if the person purposely or knowingly causes serious bodily injury to another or purposely or knowingly, with the use of physical force or contact, causes reasonable apprehension of serious bodily injury or death in another."
Montana Title 45. Crimes § 45-5-202 | FindLaw

Stop being an obnoxious and pedantic twit. You asked 4 questions and I answered.

Of course you did. As a practicing liberal I feel I have a duty to edify the ignorant, knowing even as I do the willful type of ignorance is chronic and irreversible. You answered correctly two of the four questions, which at 50% barely = a "D". That 's good, for most of the crazy right wing I would expect and "F", as most of them think sucker punching is a right and no matter what a republican says or does should never be used against him.

I guess a snowflake will whine. Still, we feel your butt-hurt, OK?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Was what he did wrong yes should he have been charged with a crime and have his day in court yes as he has been and will have. Is he a proper role model I don't know enough about his past to say and it would be unfair to judge his whole life based on this one incident. Has the media blown this incident way out of proportion yes.

IMO:

• He was charged with simple assault
• I suspect the prosecutor's office in most of America would upgrade the complaint to Battery
• The attack was tantamount to a sucker punch, if we are to believe the Fox Reporter who was only a few feet away when the event transpired. Police and little league coaches are held to a higher standard, why shouldn't a member of Congress too?

He wasn't a member of congress. It was up to the voters to act accordingly and they did.

LOL

• most of the vote was cast by mail prior to the arrest of the candidate
• he will be a member of the Congress, and he maybe in Jail or Prison
• Would a member of Congress incarcerated for a violent crime bring credit to the H. of Rep?
• Would a Republican Member of Congress bring credit to his own Party?
• Since he is not a deciding vote, do you think Ryan and the leadership want someone like him to be part of their caucus?
• Remember, Ryan's job is his first priority, his second is his ambition to be POTUS - nothing and no one will be allowed to get in is way.

 

[BlindBoo]

1. No. The man is obviously unhinged and needs to seek help.
2. Depends on what the witnesses say and how much credibility they have.
3. Yes. He is a role model for the new violent face of the GOP. Ask them a non approved question and they will bodily attack you. Reporters beware. Question at your own risk!
4. Yes on the general principle that he is an asshole, but no. It will not change the makeup of the House. The next election will settle it.

Lol! Another snowflake that believes he is clever. Where are all your posts regarding Democrats blocking emergency services on roads and highways, and the multiple violent attacks on people with a different belief system?

Hahaha-ah ha. Another asshole that.......