Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it's not "my" country. I am still an American. You do understand that, right?
And BTW, modern-day Germany is anything but miserable.
I assume that your magic underpants are just a little too tight for you today... you've been pretty grumpy lately.
But it's not "my" country. I am still an American. You do understand that, right?
And BTW, modern-day Germany is anything but miserable.
I assume that your magic underpants are just a little too tight for you today... you've been pretty grumpy lately.
No, just tired of dealing with stupid people on both sides of the spectrum on this issue. The fact that you really think the GOP 47 committed "treason", I would hope you don't really think that's how American politics works.
That is how American politics work. Whether anyone actually committed treason in the technical and legal definition is irrelevant. Perception is what matters in American politics. The Republicans responsible for the letter presented themselves as targets for their opponents to brand them as uninformed and foolish with the bonus being the opportunity to brand them as traitors. Treason is in the eye of the beholder. It is like pornography. You may not be able to define it in exact terms, but you recognize it when you see it. That the culprits have gotten away with a dastardly deed does not mean they are not guilty of the deed. It just means they knew how to get away with the crime with the use of high paid attorneys and loopholes.But it's not "my" country. I am still an American. You do understand that, right?
And BTW, modern-day Germany is anything but miserable.
I assume that your magic underpants are just a little too tight for you today... you've been pretty grumpy lately.
No, just tired of dealing with stupid people on both sides of the spectrum on this issue. The fact that you really think the GOP 47 committed "treason", I would hope you don't really think that's how American politics works.
And I again state, with those numbers if Obama goes around them through Executive Agreement then they WILL BLOCK THE DEAL..
Too funny, if you think we are going o submit our National interest to those whackos.....well then I have some beach front property in Az for you.
Future presidents are not bound to it but if Iran does not violate it and UNSC sanctions are dropped over the next fifteen years what is a future US president wanting war with Iran or to attack Iran in someway gonna do? No violation by Iran means Iran is not trying to build a bomb
[QUOTE="Antares,
.
It isn't crazy to them and THAT'S what matters.
To them creating global chaos is doing the will of Allah
Too funny, if you think we are going o submit our National interest to those whackos....
.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters a Security Council resolution would not impact the U.S. ability to act unilaterally on Iran or compel it to remove sanctions, many of which pre-date U.N. nuclear penalties.
"The Security Council would not impose new binding obligations on the United States that would limit our flexibility in any way to respond to future Iranian non-compliance," Psaki said.
She added it was always known the council would need to act to repeal U.N. sanctions if there was a deal.
Some eight U.N. resolutions, four of them imposing sanctions, demand that Iran halt uranium enrichment and other sensitive atomic work. They also bar the country from buying and selling atomic technology and anything linked to ballistic missiles. There is also a U.N. arms embargo.
I really, really wish people would stop making stuff up. There is not and has never been a max time to be considered unemployed...it wouldn't make any sense.... the Government has stopped counting the long term unemployed as if they don't matter any more? Surprising, but ok.
Too funny, if you think we are going o submit our National interest to those whackos.....well then I have some beach front property in Az for you.
If you were stupid enough to by beachfront property on the ocean in Arizona then I am not so stupid to take it off your hands.
And you cannot be that bright if you think I said we must submit our national interest to the UN at any time. Its clear that said that no violation by Iran of the P5+1 treaty over the next 15,years means Iran is not trying to build a bomb. There is not national security threat in that case.
Future presidents are not bound to it but if Iran does not violate it and UNSC sanctions are dropped over the next fifteen years what is a future US president wanting war with Iran or to attack Iran in someway gonna do? No violation by Iran means Iran is not trying to build a bomb
And I again state, with those numbers if Obama goes around them through Executive Agreement then they WILL BLOCK THE DEAL..
They cannot block the deal. The Republicans cannot block the deal. There are seven countries making the deal. All seven will agree to a deal and the P5 will act to lock the sanctions and the inspection part into a permanent UNSC Resolution. It's done. Your Republicans pulled a political partisan stunt that backfired except to the minority of right wing nut jobs in this country.
This is interesting, right?
Too funny, if you think we are going o submit our National interest to those whackos.....well then I have some beach front property in Az for you.
If you were stupid enough to by beachfront property on the ocean in Arizona then I am not so stupid to take it off your hands.
And you cannot be that bright if you think I said we must submit our national interest to the UN at any time. Its clear that said that no violation by Iran of the P5+1 treaty over the next 15,years means Iran is not trying to build a bomb. There is not national security threat in that case.
Future presidents are not bound to it but if Iran does not violate it and UNSC sanctions are dropped over the next fifteen years what is a future US president wanting war with Iran or to attack Iran in someway gonna do? No violation by Iran means Iran is not trying to build a bomb
Way to go....
So because your insane party of idiots want a war you want to scupper chances at peace.
Listen you had your war, your kind invented a load of manure and got alot of people killed. You are now the idiots of international diplomacy. You are idiots, you haven't met a country that you didn't think that could be not improved by a few bombs.
Well done to Obama and the ROW for ignoring these idiots. Wish Iran would send by a reply asking them to read their own constitution and ask were sanctions imposed by executive order?
I say there is guys in Iran now laughing their asses off.
Here's my humble take on all the back-n-forth of this rather long thread....
1. No, those 47 right wing senators will NOT be charged with any seditious acts.
2. Yes, those 46 senators were stupid in following the lead of the rabid 47th who, in turn, is being "bred" by the American Heritage Institute to accelerate and accentuate the anti-all-that-Obama-wants to do campaign.
3. We may be able to postpone Iran's nuclear plans for a few years, but we (nor the rest of the world) will ever be able to permanently prevent that nation's ambitions since Israel has long initiated this deadly arms' race.
4. Right wingers on here (many as profane as sailors in a cheap whore house) have expressed a new found "love" for Israel based more on their deep-seethed "stick-it-to-Obama-at-every-chance" syndrome.
5. Arm-chair warriors have no problem clamoring for virtually any war, and when such wars prove disastrous to all involved they swear that they were the among the forward looking few who were against such wars.
6. Finally, I also learned that right wing senators need desperately to have pen pals since they feel a bit "un-loved."
This is why America will fall.The UNSC sanctions are legally binding at the UN and in international law. The US Constitution has nothing to do with them. The US has already voted for them as did France Russia UK and China. The UNSC is developing a resolution, in response to 47 very stupid US Senators, that will lock in whatever lifted sanctions become part of a P5+1 deal with Iran. I'm not sure what you are trying to legally bind to the Constitution. The US is a member of the UN.
Here's my humble take on all the back-n-forth of this rather long thread....
1. No, those 47 right wing senators will NOT be charged with any seditious acts.
2. Yes, those 46 senators were stupid in following the lead of the rabid 47th who, in turn, is being "bred" by the American Heritage Institute to accelerate and accentuate the anti-all-that-Obama-wants to do campaign.
3. We may be able to postpone Iran's nuclear plans for a few years, but we (nor the rest of the world) will ever be able to permanently prevent that nation's ambitions since Israel has long initiated this deadly arms' race.
4. Right wingers on here (many as profane as sailors in a cheap whore house) have expressed a new found "love" for Israel based more on their deep-seethed "stick-it-to-Obama-at-every-chance" syndrome.
5. Arm-chair warriors have no problem clamoring for virtually any war, and when such wars prove disastrous to all involved they swear that they were the among the forward looking few who were against such wars.
6. Finally, I also learned that right wing senators need desperately to have pen pals since they feel a bit "un-loved."
You're a fool.
just because you say so? Who are you again?The Cotton 47 don't have to follow the Constitution.You're the one saying that simply being a part of the government grants one powers the Constitution doesn't specifically confer to them. Seems you think that only applies to the 47 Republican Senators.Now you are twisting the subject.............That's internal and he can't go to Reid and cut a Executive order to Raise taxes...............We are dealing with Foreign Countries and it is a different animal and subject.The president is part of the government -- does that mean he has the power to levy taxes, a power delegated to the Congress?
They just don't.
The "Cotton 47" didn't violate the Constitution. All your whining and feet stomping changes nothing.
You are wrong, but that shouldn't surprise anyone. It happens hourly.They agreed to US demands by wire on 8/10/45. That date was on the communique I quoted and linked to way back in the thread. I don't feel obligated to hunt the post or the article, frankly because you don't have the intellect to understand. I won't waste my time trying to educate someone stupider than a common garden slug.
I know you need your John Wayne history, but the USSR's entry into the war was the deciding factor in Japan's s urrender, not the atom bomb. We were already doing more damage to Japan with conventional bombings.
But it's not "my" country. I am still an American. You do understand that, right?
And BTW, modern-day Germany is anything but miserable.
I assume that your magic underpants are just a little too tight for you today... you've been pretty grumpy lately.
No, just tired of dealing with stupid people on both sides of the spectrum on this issue. The fact that you really think the GOP 47 committed "treason", I would hope you don't really think that's how American politics works.
It's true! No one likes the idiot."your miserable country"?
You talk about the USA that way, really?
Dude, you're posting from Germany... come on, don't try to fool anyone.
But it's not "my" country. I am still an American. You do understand that, right.
And BTW, modern-day Germany is anything but miserable.
I assume that your magic underpants are just a little too tight for you today... you've been pretty grumpy lately.
