Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Much of the 7 trillion that has accumulated under obama was because tax cuts.
To cause the federal government to lose $7 trillion because of taxes you would have to completely eliminate all taxes for about 3 years.
Do you realize how retarded you sound when you blame democrats for jobs going overseas? Where is the evidence of that you idiot? What possible connection is there for that? Just because something sounds like it could be true in that tiny brain of yours, it doesn't mean it actually is true. Quit taking responsibility from big business.
Wow! When faced with facts they can't dispute, someone's panties really get in a bunch!
Where is my evidence? It's called reality junior. As Dumbocrats have increased taxes, increased regulations, and increased salaries thanks to union extortion and/or minimum wage increases, corporations have taken more and more jobs overseas to nations that don't try to punish them for creating jobs.
Rather than going off the deep end because the facts are shaking your failed ideology to it's core, can you answer one question for me honestly?
Would any business endure the cost of severance packages for existing employees, legal costs for understanding foreign laws, costs for building new facilities in foreign lands, costs for recruiting, hiring, and training new employees, and a whole lot more if they could make the same money or more here in the U.S.? Honestly?
Corporate profits have been at an all time high.
I've explained this already - yes - because they've moved the jobs overseas where they can afford to do business and make a profit. How many times do you need this explained to you?
The one has nothing to do with the other. Apples and oranges. Stop your whining and pretense.The truth of the matter is that the wealthy receive enormous gov assistance through subsidies. The poor on the other hand get peanuts.
Let's start with the poor and SNAP (food stamps).
The average SNAP recipient receives $133 a month. The average SNAP recipient has a gross income of $744 a MONTH per household. 76% of households have at least one dependent living there. 83% of households receiving SNAP are below the poverty line. The other 17 are at the poverty line or make 130% of the poverty line. And despite what you cons like to believe, food stamps fraud is RARE.
All the sobering facts on food stamps are here.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and Realities
Now the wealthy. Oh boy.
1) corporations receive $80 billion a year through state and local subsidies.
2) Federal subsidies for corporations cost TAX PAYERS 100 billion a year.
3) The official tax rate for corporations is 35%. However, because of tax breaks, corporations only pay 13% a year in taxes.
4) wealthy hedge fund managers cost tax payers 83 billion a year.
5) subsidies for fast food companies cost tax payers 243 billion a year.
6) deductions for mortgage cost tax payers 70 billion a year. 77% of this funding goes to income earners of 100,000 a year or more.
Top Ten Examples of Welfare for the Rich » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
The more facts we learn, the more realize just how much bullshit republicanism really is.
So basically all you have going for your side of the argument is being a full of shit liar.
Okay farmer Brown. What have I lied about? Prove me wrong or shut up.
Because it goes against his belief that we should go back on the farm and screw modern civilization. What a fucked up world view!
This is what your dumbass isn't getting. Yes regulations can impede economic development, but the actual economic effect regulations have is insignificant.
I know you cons struggle with basic nuance but reality is what it is.
Do you realize how retarded you sound when you blame democrats for jobs going overseas? Where is the evidence of that you idiot? What possible connection is there for that? Just because something sounds like it could be true in that tiny brain of yours, it doesn't mean it actually is true. Quit taking responsibility from big business.
Wow! When faced with facts they can't dispute, someone's panties really get in a bunch!
Where is my evidence? It's called reality junior. As Dumbocrats have increased taxes, increased regulations, and increased salaries thanks to union extortion and/or minimum wage increases, corporations have taken more and more jobs overseas to nations that don't try to punish them for creating jobs.
Rather than going off the deep end because the facts are shaking your failed ideology to it's core, can you answer one question for me honestly?
Would any business endure the cost of severance packages for existing employees, legal costs for understanding foreign laws, costs for building new facilities in foreign lands, costs for recruiting, hiring, and training new employees, and a whole lot more if they could make the same money or more here in the U.S.? Honestly?
Corporate profits have been at an all time high.
I've explained this already - yes - because they've moved the jobs overseas where they can afford to do business and make a profit. How many times do you need this explained to you?
Shown me the evidence. Show me what regulations created by democrats specifically that are causing economic harm. You can't. You are just parroting rhetoric from the tea baggers. Tell me why is it that we have had private job growth if Obama is president and dems control the senate?
This is what your dumbass isn't getting. Yes regulations can impede economic development, but the actual economic effect regulations have is insignificant.
I know you cons struggle with basic nuance but reality is what it is.
Wait what? Regulations impede economic development but somehow don't because you and your unicorn riding fairies decided so?
Obiecare isn't insignificant in any way, We can see the effect, we are witnessing the effect, we are living the significance.
You've had your ass kicked around here like a fat kid at boot camp for 21 pages now. How much longer are you going to keep up being an idiot?
Wow! When faced with facts they can't dispute, someone's panties really get in a bunch!
Where is my evidence? It's called reality junior. As Dumbocrats have increased taxes, increased regulations, and increased salaries thanks to union extortion and/or minimum wage increases, corporations have taken more and more jobs overseas to nations that don't try to punish them for creating jobs.
Rather than going off the deep end because the facts are shaking your failed ideology to it's core, can you answer one question for me honestly?
Would any business endure the cost of severance packages for existing employees, legal costs for understanding foreign laws, costs for building new facilities in foreign lands, costs for recruiting, hiring, and training new employees, and a whole lot more if they could make the same money or more here in the U.S.? Honestly?
I've explained this already - yes - because they've moved the jobs overseas where they can afford to do business and make a profit. How many times do you need this explained to you?
Shown me the evidence. Show me what regulations created by democrats specifically that are causing economic harm. You can't. You are just parroting rhetoric from the tea baggers. Tell me why is it that we have had private job growth if Obama is president and dems control the senate?
NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton has had a huge economic impact. Many jobs left the US after NAFTA was signed.
This is what your dumbass isn't getting. Yes regulations can impede economic development, but the actual economic effect regulations have is insignificant.
I know you cons struggle with basic nuance but reality is what it is.
Wait what? Regulations impede economic development but somehow don't because you and your unicorn riding fairies decided so?
Obiecare isn't insignificant in any way, We can see the effect, we are witnessing the effect, we are living the significance.
You've had your ass kicked around here like a fat kid at boot camp for 21 pages now. How much longer are you going to keep up being an idiot?
Yes why am I not surprised you don't understand nuance? Insignificant obviously isn't in your vocabulary. How do we know it isn't significant? Because corporate profits are at an all time high.
The truth of the matter is that the wealthy receive enormous gov assistance through subsidies. The poor on the other hand get peanuts.
Let's start with the poor and SNAP (food stamps).
The average SNAP recipient receives $133 a month. The average SNAP recipient has a gross income of $744 a MONTH per household. 76% of households have at least one dependent living there. 83% of households receiving SNAP are below the poverty line. The other 17 are at the poverty line or make 130% of the poverty line. And despite what you cons like to believe, food stamps fraud is RARE.
All the sobering facts on food stamps are here.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and Realities
Now the wealthy. Oh boy.
1) corporations receive $80 billion a year through state and local subsidies.
2) Federal subsidies for corporations cost TAX PAYERS 100 billion a year.
3) The official tax rate for corporations is 35%. However, because of tax breaks, corporations only pay 13% a year in taxes.
4) wealthy hedge fund managers cost tax payers 83 billion a year.
5) subsidies for fast food companies cost tax payers 243 billion a year.
6) deductions for mortgage cost tax payers 70 billion a year. 77% of this funding goes to income earners of 100,000 a year or more.
Top Ten Examples of Welfare for the Rich » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
The more facts we learn, the more realize just how much bullshit republicanism really is.
Shown me the evidence. Show me what regulations created by democrats specifically that are causing economic harm. You can't. You are just parroting rhetoric from the tea baggers. Tell me why is it that we have had private job growth if Obama is president and dems control the senate?
NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton has had a huge economic impact. Many jobs left the US after NAFTA was signed.
You call that a regulation? It is essentially the opposite of regulation. You guys are all so funny.
Him & AzMike lol. Repub-voting sheeple Repubs put a lion's share of earmarks in legislation for their big biz buddies at the expense of the poor.
Shown me the evidence. Show me what regulations created by democrats specifically that are causing economic harm. You can't. You are just parroting rhetoric from the tea baggers. Tell me why is it that we have had private job growth if Obama is president and dems control the senate?
NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton has had a huge economic impact. Many jobs left the US after NAFTA was signed.
You call that a regulation? It is essentially the opposite of regulation. You guys are all so funny.
NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton has had a huge economic impact. Many jobs left the US after NAFTA was signed.
You call that a regulation? It is essentially the opposite of regulation. You guys are all so funny.
I know right?
You call that a regulation? It is essentially the opposite of regulation. You guys are all so funny.
I know right?
In elections, I don't care about the party, I care about the beliefs and if I'm getting snowed on. Both parties have to share blame in earmarking and hurting the working middle class. Blind partisan hacks seem to ignore the truth.
It is well known that Repubs are handmaidens to the *cough* financial services industry & the Dem's as well BUT the Dem's aren't willing to take food out of the mouths of the poor to fianace a tax cut for the likes of someone like Lloyd Blankfein.
Yeah, those forced union jobs aren't like taking any money from someone to give to someone else...not...at...all.I know right?
In elections, I don't care about the party, I care about the beliefs and if I'm getting snowed on. Both parties have to share blame in earmarking and hurting the working middle class. Blind partisan hacks seem to ignore the truth.
I said "a lion's share" meaning both sides do it.
This is what your dumbass isn't getting. Yes regulations can impede economic development, but the actual economic effect regulations have is insignificant.
I know you cons struggle with basic nuance but reality is what it is.
I know right?
In elections, I don't care about the party, I care about the beliefs and if I'm getting snowed on. Both parties have to share blame in earmarking and hurting the working middle class. Blind partisan hacks seem to ignore the truth.
I said "a lion's share" meaning both sides do it.
