FA_Q2
Gold Member
- Dec 12, 2009
- 25,561
- 6,832
What facts do you want addressed? The fact that SNAP represents a FRACTION of personal welfare and has almost nothing to do with the overall picture? The fact that several of your points are complete misrepresentations of reality or that you still have not acknowledged the difference in a subsidy, tax break and welfare payouts? Or that you have ignored any point brought up against your facts?There is such a thing as "corporate" welfare--and public individual welfare--both which most Republicans don't really care for.
The most recent abuse of corporate welfare--was Solyndra--who received their welfare check for 500 million and then went bankrupt--as did other solar corporate welfare companies in total going bankrupt for about 1 billion dollars. THIS WAS OBAMA'S way of getting green energy working in the United States. THE PROBLEM--these companies were also large donors to his campaign.
![]()
Shhhh...
This was supposed to be about how conservatives dont know anything - not about the asinine lies from the left. Funny that he complains that the republicans support welfare to the rich when the left certainly is no less guilty of such policies. I find that they are actually much WORSE.
You know I find it interesting none of you have the balls to even acknowledge the facts I presented about SNAP.
Your talking points are barely worth mention PARTICULARLY when you are railing on the right for supporting wealthy when you support the same shit policies as long as they go to your parties favored cronies. Bullshit like Solyndra as pointed out by Oreo are shining examples of the cronyism that you support. The true payouts to the wealthy.