Republicans Introduce Legislation To Ban Democratic Party

[Pogo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

/——/ Yeah, right, you screwball. Southern Democrats - Wikipedia
In the 19th century, Southern Democrats were whites in the South who believed in Jacksonian democracy. In the 1850s they defended slavery in the United States, and promoted its expansion into the West against northern Free Soil opposition. The United States presidential election of 1860formalized the split in the Democratic Party and brought about the American Civil War. Stephen Douglas was the candidate for the Northern Democratic Party, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party, Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery was the Republican Party candidate.

**NONE** of this refutes or even addresses at all, anything I just laid out about the Confederacy not having political parties (there was no Confederacy in the 1850s), OR about the Klan.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Why does anyone care what this grandstanding tub of shit has to say? Perfect example of the kind of crap that needs to be hosed out of the Capitol building. Right along with the House Freedom Cucks.
Zero idea of the makeup of his district but it must be heavily gerrymandered. Because no one this friggin stupid should be allowed to walk the halls of Congress.

On the bright side, at least he didn't say Guam would tip over.

 

[Pogo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

Robert Byrd was the Grand Wizard of the Democrat party. Now take some responsibility for once in your life and denounce your racist past.

Go fuck yourself.

You should demand all things named after Robert Byrd be changed to Abraham Lincoln.

You should cram a pineapple up your ass backwards.

you racist cock sucking motherfucker. How dare you continue to support a party that started the Ku Klux Klan. Fuck you you racist piece of shit.

See -- here once again some asswipe gets to fling turds of accusations he can't prove, and if I counter, my post will be deleted. Fuck this board.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Another bumptious gambit that will accomplish zilch...

Mind-blowing. If anything, blacks will be insulted that these folks think they'll just ignore everything they've seen and experienced in their own lives because of some partisan "resolution".

This kind of shallow thinking just doesn't stop.

It is not shallow at all.
It is a stroke of genius. Nothing but.
AGAIN - if Democrats insist on the cancel movement - then there is nothing - NOTHING - that has created more harm to blacks than the Democratic Party itself. PERIOD.

Okay, it's genius, I'm sure it will really show them Dems a thing or two.

If done right it sure can.
You can't provide argument can you?
It is high time light is shone on just how devastating the Democratic Party has been for black Americans. High time.
Including the 1950s - 1980s when they were packing blacks in like sardines in urban projects - carefully positioned away from THEIR neighborhood and schools.
When it comes to the condition of urban blacks - TODAY - the Democratic Party is the architect/engineer/builder and financier of it.

By all means, go ahead.

I don't know whose mind you think you're changing, but minorities aren't going to be swayed by a partisan "resolution". They live in the real world, and they know who is what.

They do not live in the real world. What an ignorant thing to say. Holy hell.
What happened to you anyway? You were a decent poster before. Trump delusion is so ingrained in your mind - it is clearly all you see, Unable to talk intelligently as you did before.
It is high time black Americans woke up and see that the Democrats simply turned them from being actual slaves - to economic slaves dependent on their handouts instead of opportunities to GET OUT.
The Democrats built the projects that packed them like sardines in areas way from THEM...away from jobs... and gave them just enough money to survive.
Poison.

Minorities don't live in the real world?

And you think I'M deluded?

Just keep doing what you're doing.

They live in anything but the real world. (Speaking only of inner city blacks, everywhere else they succeed/fail pretty much exactly like any other race.)
A world where your homes are built for you, your income is primarily government handouts, your education is paid for and you are given NO encouragement to succeed and you pay NO price if you don't.
That is not the real world.

 

[Mac1958]

Another bumptious gambit that will accomplish zilch...

Mind-blowing. If anything, blacks will be insulted that these folks think they'll just ignore everything they've seen and experienced in their own lives because of some partisan "resolution".

This kind of shallow thinking just doesn't stop.

It is not shallow at all.
It is a stroke of genius. Nothing but.
AGAIN - if Democrats insist on the cancel movement - then there is nothing - NOTHING - that has created more harm to blacks than the Democratic Party itself. PERIOD.

Okay, it's genius, I'm sure it will really show them Dems a thing or two.

If done right it sure can.
You can't provide argument can you?
It is high time light is shone on just how devastating the Democratic Party has been for black Americans. High time.
Including the 1950s - 1980s when they were packing blacks in like sardines in urban projects - carefully positioned away from THEIR neighborhood and schools.
When it comes to the condition of urban blacks - TODAY - the Democratic Party is the architect/engineer/builder and financier of it.

By all means, go ahead.

I don't know whose mind you think you're changing, but minorities aren't going to be swayed by a partisan "resolution". They live in the real world, and they know who is what.

They do not live in the real world. What an ignorant thing to say. Holy hell.
What happened to you anyway? You were a decent poster before. Trump delusion is so ingrained in your mind - it is clearly all you see, Unable to talk intelligently as you did before.
It is high time black Americans woke up and see that the Democrats simply turned them from being actual slaves - to economic slaves dependent on their handouts instead of opportunities to GET OUT.
The Democrats built the projects that packed them like sardines in areas way from THEM...away from jobs... and gave them just enough money to survive.
Poison.

Minorities don't live in the real world?

And you think I'M deluded?

Just keep doing what you're doing.

They live in anything but the real world. (Speaking only of inner city blacks, everywhere else they succeed/fail pretty much exactly like any other race.)
A world where your homes are built for you, your income is primarily government handouts, your education is paid for and you are given NO encouragement to succeed and you pay NO price if you don't.
That is not the real world.

Yikes. Okay.

 

[Cellblock2429]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

/——/ Yeah, right, you screwball. Southern Democrats - Wikipedia
In the 19th century, Southern Democrats were whites in the South who believed in Jacksonian democracy. In the 1850s they defended slavery in the United States, and promoted its expansion into the West against northern Free Soil opposition. The United States presidential election of 1860formalized the split in the Democratic Party and brought about the American Civil War. Stephen Douglas was the candidate for the Northern Democratic Party, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party, Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery was the Republican Party candidate.

**NONE** of this refutes or even addresses at all, anything I just laid out about the Confederacy not having political parties (there was no Confederacy in the 1850s), OR about the Klan.

/-----/ So you're saying the democRAT party disappeared during the Civil War and reemerged after the war ended?

 

[JustAGuy1]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

Robert Byrd was the Grand Wizard of the Democrat party. Now take some responsibility for once in your life and denounce your racist past.

I see my rejoinder to the accusing poster has been deleted while the vacuous accusation itself is allowed to stand.

This shit is exactly why I quit this place.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.....again.

 

[Pogo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

Robert Byrd was the Grand Wizard of the Democrat party. Now take some responsibility for once in your life and denounce your racist past.

Robert Byrd denounced the klan. Republicans happily accepted Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms.

Listen up for once in your pathetic life. Woodrow Wilson was the poster child of the Democrat racism and the stupid moron signed the Federal Reserve in to law.

I'm mean, just on idiotic Democrat racist fucked up the entire world.

Republicans were just as racist and today they are the party of racism.

No, Democrats are the party of race baiting and the mistake Republicans made was after freeing the slaves the first time they didn't think they would have to do it again.

"Party of race baiting" huh.

Who was it that said, "they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists..."?
Who was it that called African/Caribbean nations "shithole countries"?
Who was it who declared suburbs are going to hell?
Who was it who said "laziness is a trait in blacks, I really believe that"?
Who was it who said to the government investigator suing his apartments for screening out black people, "come on Elise --- you don't want to live with them either"?
Who was it who called a sitting Senator "Pocahontas"?

Help me out here, I remember the quotes but who said them is out of reach, the memory isn't what it used to be.

 

[Pogo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

/——/ Yeah, right, you screwball. Southern Democrats - Wikipedia
In the 19th century, Southern Democrats were whites in the South who believed in Jacksonian democracy. In the 1850s they defended slavery in the United States, and promoted its expansion into the West against northern Free Soil opposition. The United States presidential election of 1860formalized the split in the Democratic Party and brought about the American Civil War. Stephen Douglas was the candidate for the Northern Democratic Party, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party, Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery was the Republican Party candidate.

**NONE** of this refutes or even addresses at all, anything I just laid out about the Confederacy not having political parties (there was no Confederacy in the 1850s), OR about the Klan.

/-----/ So you're saying the democRAT party disappeared during the Civil War and reemerged after the war ended?

Wow, did something actually sink in here?

Yep, Tennessee seceded in 1861. At that point it was no longer part of the United States. During the short term of the CSA, that country had no political parties. It was readmitted to this country in 1866. The Klan however was founded in `1865 --- outside the United States and outside of its political parties.

You don't have political parties in a place where you don't have political OFFICES. That's one reason I can challenge these yahoos to find any political party affiliation for the Klan founders I keep listing in detail. They can't. It doesn't exist.

As long as we're on the topic of political parties for the purpose of constructing elementary-school level Ass-ociation Fallacies, here's a cuppla fun facts:

In the last election before that secession and the CW that state (Tennessee) didn't vote for the Democrat Douglas or the Breakaway Democrat Breckinridge, nor did it vote for Lincoln, who hadn't been placed on the ballot by the six-year-old Republican Party. It voted for John Bell of the Constitutional Union Party, an offshoot of the Whigs, which advocated NOT spreading slavery and NOT seceding. Virginia voted for him too, even though VA would become the vital cog in the Confederacy, hosting its capital. And after that War the latter state was dominated not by Democrats but by the Readjuster Party, until the 20th century.

Yes Virginia, the 1860 election was a four-way race, which is why Lincoln only got 39% of the pop vote (that, and not being on the ballot in states that would become the Confederacy). The Democrat Douglas came in dead last, winning a total of one state (border state Missouri). After losing that election he went on a speaking tour around the South to dissuade them from the secession idea and when that failed, advised Lincoln on how to defeat them.

You see Sparkles, the idea of secession anywhere not named South Carolina was highly controversial. Referenda were held amid passionate debate basically between the Haves and the Have Nots, the latter being enlisted (literally) to go fight a war for the former, which is why the latter despised the former. In East Tennessee, the future POTUS and Lincoln VP Andrew Johnson gave stirring oratory against the idea and the referendum failed there by 95% to 5. You remember Johnson --- the Democrat? Go ahead and build your Ass-ociation Fallacy around that. It'll be cute.

 

[iceberg]

really? APRIL FOOLS?????

Nope it's real.
Two can play the game

hey - their rules. if you're going to hold people accountable to a past they were never a part of - it's high time for an IN YOUR FACE example of how stupid that is.

this is brilliant.

 

[iceberg]

Yeah, this will convince minorities to change their minds about Trumpsters.

what the fuck does it have to due with trump, TDS boy?

it is simply telling the Democrats if you are going to hold people accountable for a past they were not a part of - the rule applies to them as well.

sucks dog tit when your fucked up rules come back at you like this huh? but hey - TRUMP n shit. try and deflect.

 

[asaratis]

The Democrat Party, in its push to remove all vestiges of slavery, statues of former slave holders, names of things related to slave holders, memories of anything related to blatant racism (such as the KKK), opposition to civil rights laws...has accomplished one or more of the following:

• bitten its own ass.
• shot itself in both feet.
• exposed itself as a candidate for cancellation.
• failed miserably in considering the ramifications.

I will now go to my room and laugh my ass off!!!

To hell with the Democrat Party!

 

[Cellblock2429]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

/——/ Yeah, right, you screwball. Southern Democrats - Wikipedia
In the 19th century, Southern Democrats were whites in the South who believed in Jacksonian democracy. In the 1850s they defended slavery in the United States, and promoted its expansion into the West against northern Free Soil opposition. The United States presidential election of 1860formalized the split in the Democratic Party and brought about the American Civil War. Stephen Douglas was the candidate for the Northern Democratic Party, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party, Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery was the Republican Party candidate.

**NONE** of this refutes or even addresses at all, anything I just laid out about the Confederacy not having political parties (there was no Confederacy in the 1850s), OR about the Klan.

/-----/ So you're saying the democRAT party disappeared during the Civil War and reemerged after the war ended?

Wow, did something actually sink in here?

Yep, Tennessee seceded in 1861. At that point it was no longer part of the United States. During the short term of the CSA, that country had no political parties. It was readmitted to this country in 1866. The Klan however was founded in `1865 --- outside the United States and outside of its political parties.

You don't have political parties in a place where you don't have political OFFICES. That's one reason I can challenge these yahoos to find any political party affiliation for the Klan founders I keep listing in detail. They can't. It doesn't exist.

/----/ The slave owners were democRATs before, during, and after the CW. Deal with it.

 

[iceberg]

The Democrat Party, in its push to remove all vestiges of slavery, statues of former slave holders, names of things related to slave holders, memories of anything related to blatant racism (such as the KKK), opposition to civil rights laws...has accomplished one or more of the following:

• bitten its own ass.
• shot itself in both feet.
• exposed itself as a candidate for cancellation.
• failed miserably in considering the ramifications.

I will now go to my room and laugh my ass off!!!

To hell with the Democrat Party!

BUT IT WAS SUCH A GOOD IDEA ON PAPER!!!

but you know god damn good and well their rules for SOME reason won't apply to them.

 

[Mac1958]

Yeah, this will convince minorities to change their minds about Trumpsters.

what the fuck does it have to due with trump, TDS boy?

it is simply telling the Democrats if you are going to hold people accountable for a past they were not a part of - the rule applies to them as well.

suck dog tit when your fucked up rules come back at you like this huh? but hey - TRUMP n shit. try and deflect.

 

[iceberg]

Yeah, this will convince minorities to change their minds about Trumpsters.

what the fuck does it have to due with trump, TDS boy?

it is simply telling the Democrats if you are going to hold people accountable for a past they were not a part of - the rule applies to them as well.

suck dog tit when your fucked up rules come back at you like this huh? but hey - TRUMP n shit. try and deflect.

tee hee
giggles

you really are what, 9?

 

[Pogo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

/——/ Yeah, right, you screwball. Southern Democrats - Wikipedia
In the 19th century, Southern Democrats were whites in the South who believed in Jacksonian democracy. In the 1850s they defended slavery in the United States, and promoted its expansion into the West against northern Free Soil opposition. The United States presidential election of 1860formalized the split in the Democratic Party and brought about the American Civil War. Stephen Douglas was the candidate for the Northern Democratic Party, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party, Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery was the Republican Party candidate.

**NONE** of this refutes or even addresses at all, anything I just laid out about the Confederacy not having political parties (there was no Confederacy in the 1850s), OR about the Klan.

/-----/ So you're saying the democRAT party disappeared during the Civil War and reemerged after the war ended?

Wow, did something actually sink in here?

Yep, Tennessee seceded in 1861. At that point it was no longer part of the United States. During the short term of the CSA, that country had no political parties. It was readmitted to this country in 1866. The Klan however was founded in `1865 --- outside the United States and outside of its political parties.

You don't have political parties in a place where you don't have political OFFICES. That's one reason I can challenge these yahoos to find any political party affiliation for the Klan founders I keep listing in detail. They can't. It doesn't exist.

/----/ The slave owners were democRATs before, during, and after the CW. Deal with it.

NOBODY was a slave owner after the CW. Linear time, deal with that. There's number one.

Inasmuch as the only slave owners DURING the CW who had a political party were in the North where their state's abolishment had not come into full effect, they could have had any party (fun fact: the last POTUS to have been a slaveowner was Ulysses Grant). That's number two.

At *NO* time before during or after the CW, OR before we were a country, was it necessary to affiliate with any political party at all. It simply isn't part of slaveowning and never has been. That's number two and a half.

And for the over three hundred years that there was slavery on this continent before there was a Democratic Party, by definition ZERO of those slaveowneers were "Democrats" --- again, simple case of that entity not existing. That's number three. And I believe we've covered Before, During and After. But perhaps there's another demention in Flooby Dust Land where we haven't touched.

Prove ANY of that wrong.

 

[Mac1958]

Yeah, this will convince minorities to change their minds about Trumpsters.

what the fuck does it have to due with trump, TDS boy?

it is simply telling the Democrats if you are going to hold people accountable for a past they were not a part of - the rule applies to them as well.

suck dog tit when your fucked up rules come back at you like this huh? but hey - TRUMP n shit. try and deflect.

tee hee
giggles

you really are what, 9?

Could you get all this out in one post, please? Just really let me have it.

All you guys want to do is show me how far up in your heads I exist.

I don't understand what you think you're accomplishing.

Just get it all out, I'll give you a little Thank You thing, and you can get on with your life.

 

[BlindBoo]

That's right, folks.

Any political party that was associated with slavery should be dismantled tomorrow.


"Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slavery in the U.S., a list he said includes the Democratic Party.

“A great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan,” Gohmert said in a statement."

GOP’s Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) introduced a House resolution Thursday calling on lawmakers to ban organizations or political groups that have historically supported the Confederacy or slave…

thehill.com

Once AGAIN the Confederacy had no political parties. It was not "supported" by Democrats. Fun fact: Lincoln's vice-president ....... was a Democrat. As for "ties to the Ku Klux Klan", Ed Jackson, Rice Means, George Luis Baker, Owen Brewster, D.C. Stephenson, Albert Johnston, Clarence Morley, Ben Paulen and David Duke find that faux pas hilarious.

It ain't surprising that this lunacy came from Louie Gohmert. That screwball's an embarrassment to Texas.

The democrats were far worse than the confederacy because Black people were in the confederacy it was Democrats that wanted them as slaves

White folks in the ill fated and short lived Confederacy believed that holding black folks as slaves in perpetuity (meaning forever, and their kids too!) was their Divine right. Northern Democrats also voted overwhelmingly for the Civil Rights act, as opposed to the Southern Democrats.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Another bumptious gambit that will accomplish zilch...

Mind-blowing. If anything, blacks will be insulted that these folks think they'll just ignore everything they've seen and experienced in their own lives because of some partisan "resolution".

This kind of shallow thinking just doesn't stop.

It is not shallow at all.
It is a stroke of genius. Nothing but.
AGAIN - if Democrats insist on the cancel movement - then there is nothing - NOTHING - that has created more harm to blacks than the Democratic Party itself. PERIOD.

Okay, it's genius, I'm sure it will really show them Dems a thing or two.

If done right it sure can.
You can't provide argument can you?
It is high time light is shone on just how devastating the Democratic Party has been for black Americans. High time.
Including the 1950s - 1980s when they were packing blacks in like sardines in urban projects - carefully positioned away from THEIR neighborhood and schools.
When it comes to the condition of urban blacks - TODAY - the Democratic Party is the architect/engineer/builder and financier of it.

By all means, go ahead.

I don't know whose mind you think you're changing, but minorities aren't going to be swayed by a partisan "resolution". They live in the real world, and they know who is what.

They do not live in the real world. What an ignorant thing to say. Holy hell.
What happened to you anyway? You were a decent poster before. Trump delusion is so ingrained in your mind - it is clearly all you see, Unable to talk intelligently as you did before.
It is high time black Americans woke up and see that the Democrats simply turned them from being actual slaves - to economic slaves dependent on their handouts instead of opportunities to GET OUT.
The Democrats built the projects that packed them like sardines in areas way from THEM...away from jobs... and gave them just enough money to survive.
Poison.

Minorities don't live in the real world?

And you think I'M deluded?

Just keep doing what you're doing.

They live in anything but the real world. (Speaking only of inner city blacks, everywhere else they succeed/fail pretty much exactly like any other race.)
A world where your homes are built for you, your income is primarily government handouts, your education is paid for and you are given NO encouragement to succeed and you pay NO price if you don't.
That is not the real world.

Yikes. Okay.

Yikes you don't like what is?
So, specifically, exactly what is inaccurate with what I said?
You never argue specifics, just Trump! Trump! Trump!
Go right ahead and tell me how the Democratic Party has been good for black Americans.
I'll await your response.
But I already know what it is.... nothing substantive.