Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

[mamooth]

Leftists hate people making their own decisions,

Sad pervy anti-abortion control freaks don't get to project like that. Yes, they'll try, but the liberty-minded will point out their staggering hypocrisy.

 

[mamooth]

Leftists are like that.

Using absurdity to point out your stinking hypocrisy doesn't make us stupid. It just makes you a hypocrite, a coward, and a piss-chuggign fascist imbecile.

You're literally too 'effin stupid to understand satire. No wonder the fascists brainwashed you so easily.

 

[mamooth]

The only issues I'm seeing here on the part of you folks losing your minds over the Supreme Court tossing out a bad decision that never should have been made much less upheld.

You're claiming there is no right to privacy?

You're actually going that full-metal fascist? And you're bragging about it?

Why do you fear democracy?

By your twisted anti-liberty logic, allowing individual states to decide if slavery is okay is pro-democracy.

Anways, the pro-life minority is demanding a national ban, despite being a very small minority. And you're kissing their tyrant asses, so you're clearly backing the anti-democracy faction here.

You can demonstrate you're not a democracy-hating fascist. Just unequivably condemn the Republican party for attempting a national ban.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Or when a woman has been raped!!!! This is scientifically proven!!!

Are you saying no woman has ever given birth after being raped?

 

[daveman]

No Dave you are lying. If you are on the far right you're for me accepting you're party's beliefs which NOT ONE that I accept. NOT ONE. I share none of your ideals nor do I accept any of the Dems. See how that works?

Whatever.

 

[daveman]

Sad pervy anti-abortion control freaks don't get to project like that. Yes, they'll try, but the liberty-minded will point out their staggering hypocrisy.

Hush, you gibbering retard.

 

[daveman]

Using absurdity to point out your stinking hypocrisy doesn't make us stupid. It just makes you a hypocrite, a coward, and a piss-chuggign fascist imbecile.

You're literally too 'effin stupid to understand satire. No wonder the fascists brainwashed you so easily.

Why are you talking to me, you retard? Nobody wants the bullshit you're selling.

 

[daveman]

You're claiming there is no right to privacy?

You're actually going that full-metal fascist? And you're bragging about it?


By your twisted anti-liberty logic, allowing individual states to decide if slavery is okay is pro-democracy.

Anways, the pro-life minority is demanding a national ban, despite being a very small minority. And you're kissing their tyrant asses, so you're clearly backing the anti-democracy faction here.

You can demonstrate you're not a democracy-hating fascist. Just unequivably condemn the Republican party for attempting a national ban.

Republicans are inconvenient for you. Maybe you should try to abort them.

Leftists love aborting inconvenient people, or, as it's rightly called, "filling mass graves".

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Republicans are inconvenient for you. Maybe you should try to abort them.

Leftists love aborting inconvenient people, or, as it's rightly called, "filling mass graves".

If they could convince republicans to become rabidly pro abortion they would hold power perpetually until the dissolution of the country.

Maybe they should have been trying to sell it as a positive to the opposition instead of demonizing them?

 

[daveman]

If they could convince republicans to become rabidly pro abortion they would hold power perpetually until the dissolution of the country.

Maybe they should have been trying to sell it as a positive to the opposition instead of demonizing them?

Not sure how rational people are going to be convinced that inconvenient people should be killed. But it worked in Germany, didn't it?

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Not sure how rational people are going to be convinced that inconvenient people should be killed. But it worked in Germany, didn't it?

That's why in fifty years they have yet to accomplish it.

 

[daveman]

That's why in fifty years they have yet to accomplish it.

They've had all this time to codify RvW as Federal law.

But they didn't.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

They've had all this time to codify RvW as Federal law.

But they didn't.

Which won't hold up under the rationale they used to reverse Roe sending it back to the states under the 9th and 10th Amendments.

 

[DGS49]

Stupid comment.

The Court is saying that this sort of policy decision - outside anything stated or inferable from the Constitution - must be made by the Peoples' representatives in Congress and/or the state legislatures.

The draft decision says NOTHING about whether a prohibitive abortion regime (which prevailed for the first 200 years of the Republic) or a liberal abortion regime is better public policy. The whole POINT of the decision is that that is not the Court's decision to make.

Jesus!

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Stupid comment.

The Court is saying that this sort of policy decision - outside anything stated or inferable from the Constitution - must be made by the Peoples' representatives in Congress and/or the state legislatures.

The draft decision says NOTHING about whether a prohibitive abortion regime (which prevailed for the first 200 years of the Republic) or a liberal abortion regime is better public policy. The whole POINT of the decision is that that is not the Court's decision to make.

Jesus!

Stupid comments are flowing like rainwater on this topic right now.

 

[Independent thinker]

“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/03/25/ketanji-brown-jackson-roe/

Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.

Democrats would not be satisfied with sticking to one issue if they eliminated the filibuster. They would use it to further a bunch of their political goals, including staying in power forever. Don't go implying that it is only one party who wants total control. Both parties do.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Unless she's being raped the woman is always the ultimate decider about having sex and using birth control.

Her body, her choice, her responsibility.

You can say what you want about men's responsibility but you cant' have it both ways. If the woman has the right, she also has the responsibility not to make babies she doesn't want.

Like I said. You “Commanders of The Republic of Gilead” believe men have no responsibility at all for negligently impregnating a woman. None.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

But it's okay when you do it.

No,dope. If you do it to women to preserve life, the penalty should be shared by both parties.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Women are not being forced to get abortion or use birth control.

Ridiculous argument.

No. Just forced to have a child against their will, dope.
Now tell us again how mask mandates are tyranny.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I don't give a flying fuck what you were responding to.
bigrebnc1775 said:
How can a man take any responsibility when a woman is screaming it's my body it's my right?
NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION

Of course you don’t. That’s why you posted dumb shit that had nothing to do with what I posted.